My gut is telling me not to read him because he looks like a caricature of a disgusting and untrustworthy jew but is Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human worth reading if im in my shakespeare arc?

>>24478451 (OP)
>arc
zoomer nu-speak
kys

>>24478451 (OP)
No. I've only read his introduction to Remembrance of Things Past, but it was vile.

>>24478454
>if I'm in a mood for shakespeare/if I'm currently invested in shakespeare
wow that was hard to interpret. by the way, every single word you typed in is a post-2000 invention, you should kill yourself for not adapting your writing conventions to my own taste even if whatever you're trying to express is perfectly understandable and a perfectly natural evolution.

>duuude the way he looks
ngmi

>>24478451 (OP)
Of his literary interests Shakespeare is one of the most prominent. As he is wont to do more than your average annotated Shakespeare analysis he will be more opinionated and read more into the material than most, this can be good or bad depending on how much you agree. He has a major boner for Falstaff but then most Shakespeare fans do.

>>24478451 (OP)
No, he just rips off classic English literary criticism. He's 'alright' if you just want to get a rundown on some established opinions on Shakespeare, but he confuses and exaggerates things and on the whole is a very shitty critic. Pseuds like him because they don't think for themselves.

>>24478451 (OP)
Everything he writes is false, including his idea that Shakespeare invented the human.
Shakespeare's characters are actually shit. Tolstoy wrote some good things showing in detail how shit they are.

>>24478454
>complains about zoomer language
>only uses zoomer words himself

>>24478451 (OP)
Retroactively refuted by Dr Scott Masson

>>24478646
post-2000 invention is not the same as zoomer nu-speak.
>>24478998
ditto

>>24478451 (OP)


Hath not a Jew eyes? hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as
a Christian is? If you prick us, do we not bleed?
if you tickle us, do we not laugh? if you poison
us, do we not die? and if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?

>>24479233
If we are the same, what then separates the Jew from the gentile, Rabbi?

>>24479309
circumcision

>>24479336
Getting a straight answer out of a Jew is like trying to nail jello to a wall.

I doubt Bloom has much of anything worth saying.

>>24478451 (OP)
That disgusting and untrustworthy jew is a borderline Western culture supremacist. Do you even bother ever looking past your dogshit retard intuition?

>>24478451 (OP)
>my shakespeare arc
Kys.

He really seethed against the Merchant of Venice which he called viciously antisemitic and a terrible influence. Although honestly it seemed to me that he point of Shylock was that anyone would be a villain if they were in the Jew’s shoes

>>24478451 (OP)
This is the based physiognomy actually. Aaron Russo looked like this

read his book on Yeshua (jesus) ad you will know all you need
>>24479591
>shakespeare only makes sense in Yiddish played by jews btw

>>24479952
need one of those reverse Merchant Of Venice Situation where Everyone is Jewish and Shylock of a Goy.

>>24478451 (OP)
stick to colin still and ac bradley

>>24478451 (OP)
Yeah, it is
Also pick up Harold Goddard's 2 vo. The Meaning of Shakespeare; it's fantastic

>>24479341

hello fellow Goyim, don't you know we are bound by the 7 noahide laws???

"According to Jewish law, non-Jews (gentiles) are not obligated to convert to Judaism, but they are required to observe the Seven Laws of Noah to be assured of a place in the World to Come (Olam Ha-Ba), the final reward of the righteous"

>https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/62221/jewish/The-7-Noahide-Laws.htm