“Within a nominally Christian world, chivalry upheld without any substantial alterations an Aryan ethics in the following things:
(1) upholding the ideal of the hero rather than the saint, and of the conqueror rather than of the martyr;
(2) regarding faithfulness and honor, rather than caritas and humbleness, as the highest virtues;
(3) regarding cowardice and dishonor, rather than sin, as the worst possible evil;
(4) ignoring or hardly putting into practice the evangelical precepts of not opposing evil and not retaliating against offenses, but rather, methodically punishing unfairness and evil;
(5) excluding from its ranks those who followed the Christian precept ‘Thou Shalt Not Kill’ to the letter; and
(6) refusing to love one’s enemy and instead fighting him and being magnanimous only after defeating him.

In reality, chivalry was animated by the impulse toward a ‘traditional’ restoration in the highest sense of the word, with the silent or explicit overcoming of the Christian religious spirit.”

“[T]hose who love to contrast the past with our recent times should consider what modern civilization has brought us to in terms of war. A change of level has occurred; from the warrior who fights for the honor and for the right of his lord, society has shifted to the type of the mere "soldier" that is found in association with the removal of all transcendent or even religious elements in the idea of fighting.”

“Knighthood, instead, appeared as a superterritorial and supernational community in which its members, who were consecrated to military priesthood, no longer had a homeland and thus were bound by faithfulness not to people but, on the one hand, to an ethics that had as its fundamental values honor, truth, courage, and loyalty and, on the other hand, to a spiritual authority of a universal type, which was essentially that of the Empire.”

“The blood of the heroes is closer to God than the ink of the philosophers and the prayers of the faithful.”

“The best and most authentic reaction against feminism and against every other female aberration should not be aimed at women as such, but at men instead. It should not be expected of women that they return to what they really are and thus reestablish the necessary inner and outer conditions for a reintegration of a superior race, when men themselves retain only the semblance of true virility.”

“According to the modern man, both causes and effects are relegated to the physical plane, framed within time and space. According to the traditional man the physical plane merely contains effects; nothing takes place in this world that did not originate first in the next world or in the invisible dimension.”

The entrance of the woman with equal rights into practical modern life, her new freedom, her finding herself side by side with men in the streets, offices, professions, factories, sports, and now even in political and military life, is one of those dissolutive phenomena in which, in most cases, it is difficult to perceive anything positive. In essence, all this is simply the renunciation of the woman's right to be a woman.

“The best and most authentic reaction against feminism and against every other female aberration should not be aimed at women as such, but at men instead. It should not be expected of women that they return to what they really are and thus reestablish the necessary inner and outer conditions for a reintegration of a superior race, when men themselves retain only the semblance of true virility.”

"My principles are only those that, before the French Revolution, every well-born person considered sane and normal."

“One thing becomes very clear; if the Empire declines and if it continues to exist only nominally, its antagonist, the Church, after enjoying untrammeled freedom from its ancient foe, did not know how to assume its legacy, and demonstrated its inability to organize the Western world according to the Guelph ideal. What replaced the Empire was not the Church at the head of a reinvigorated "Christendom," but the multiplicity of national states that were increasingly intolerant of any higher principle of authority.”

"Prior to the advent of the civilization of the Third Estate (mercantilism, capitalism), the social ethics that was religiously sanctioned in the West consisted in realizing one’s being and in achieving one’s own perfection within the fixed parameters that one’s individual nature and the group to which one belonged clearly defined. Economic activity, work, and profit were justified only in the measure in which they were necessary for sustenance and to ensure the dignity of an existence conformed to one’s own estate, without the lower instinct of self-interest or profit coming first."

>>24480734

“In the traditional world the individual did not exist as an atomized unit; he was a part of an organic whole, a hierarchical order in which everyone had a place and function. Kings were not mere political rulers but sacred symbols of cosmic order...
The regression that led from the spiritual authority of the sacerdotal caste to the temporal power of the warrior caste, and finally to the economic and plebeian elements, represents the fall from being to becoming, from heaven to earth, from the metaphysical to the material.”

“Modern Western civilization is the only civilization known to history that has developed entirely from below. It has eliminated, one after the other, every higher influence—first the sacerdotal, then the regal, then the heroic, then even the bourgeois—until finally it has enthroned the economic man, the mass man, the last man.
This civilization is in revolt not only against Tradition, but against everything truly superior, virile, and spiritual in man.”

“One of the most important distinctions made by traditional doctrine concerns two forms of authority: the spiritual and the temporal. These were represented symbolically by the sun and the moon, respectively.

The solar symbolism referred to a transcendent authority, virile and luminous, tied to the principle of being, immortality, and unchangeability. The lunar symbolism, instead, was bound to the feminine, to becoming, to periodicity, and to reflected light.

This is why, in many traditions, the true kingship—the divine right to rule—was always associated with the solar principle. The degeneration of this kingship often meant that the throne fell under the influence of the lunar priesthood or of a material power no longer connected to the metaphysical axis.”

>>24480756
“The doctrine of two paths—lunar and solar—is found in multiple initiatory traditions. The lunar path, the ‘Path of the Ancestors,’ is associated with a gradual dissolution into the ancestral sphere or astral shadows. It is tied to rites of the feminine type, centered on death and rebirth, cyclical becoming, and lunar symbolism.

The solar path, by contrast, is that of the heroes and of solar immortality. It represents an abrupt awakening and breaking of bonds; not continuity but transcendence. It is not a return, but a conquest: the self overcomes the condition of conditioned being and joins the order of the gods.

This is why the hero’s death is not mourned but celebrated: he has ascended to the solar realm.”
“Traditionally, the man is associated with the solar, the form-giving, and the unshaken axis. Woman is associated with the lunar, with nature, fertility, the tides, and all that ebbs and flows.

The male principle stands in opposition to chaos, embodying measure, law, and spiritual authority. The feminine principle, while not evil, belongs to the plane of manifestation, of flux, and therefore must be mastered by the masculine in the rite of hierogamy or initiation.

It is not that the feminine is to be denied, but rather transfigured through subordination to the higher order—just as the moon’s light is not its own but a reflection of the sun’s.”

“Where the priesthood no longer serves as a conduit to the solar principle, it becomes feminine, maternal, and earth-bound. Then, the sacred becomes confused with the magical, and transcendence gives way to immanence—ritual becomes mere fertility rite, and the divine is drawn down into the earth, no longer above the world.”

“In the most ancient traditions of both East and West, there is a memory of a polar, solar civilization: the Hyperborean race.

This race was not defined by biology alone, but by a spiritual and metaphysical orientation. The Hyperboreans were said to dwell in a land beyond the North Wind, where the sun never set—a symbolic geography expressing transcendence over time, over becoming.

This original race stood at the apex of the cycle, embodying the unity of regal and spiritual authority. Later races and civilizations, especially the southern, feminine, and telluric ones, represent the fall from this apex into the world of becoming.”

“The idea of a ‘Center of the World’ corresponds to a metaphysical reality. The Hyperborean pole is such a center: a spiritual axis (axis mundi) connecting heaven and earth, being and becoming.

The symbolism of the pole star, the mountain, the tree of life—all these point to the same truth: there existed a center of order, from which all traditional civilizations radiated.

The degeneration of this original Hyperborean tradition involved its migration southward, into less spiritual and more material peoples, where the original meanings were lost or inverted.”

“The Hyperborean civilization should not be confused with the more material Atlantis. Atlantis was already a fallen version, a hybrid mixing the spirit of the North with the telluric forces of the South.

With the submersion of Atlantis, what remained of the Hyperborean inheritance was broken and scattered. Degenerate forms of the sacred spread—especially in matriarchal, telluric, and lunar cults, which gradually replaced the solar and virile rites of the North.

Thus began the confusion of castes, the rise of priestesses and earth goddesses, and the decline of heroic values. What was once transcendent became immanent; what was once vertical became horizontal.”

>>24480725 (OP)
I prefer to stick to primary source materials. Fact is, you worship a dumb Jew on a stick. No amount of mental gymnastics and layering more and more spurious theory can get around that.

>>24480761
“What we must understand by ‘Hyperborean’ is not only a geographic or physical type, but a race of the spirit.

The Hyperborean man possessed a solar, Olympian soul: detached, active, ascetic, heroic. His nobility was inward and metaphysical, not merely tribal. This race did not evolve in the Darwinian sense, but fell—its original condition was a superior one, and its ‘history’ is a history of degradation.

The true task of the Aryan type is to awaken this Hyperborean legacy, to purify itself from Semitic, southern, and modern influences, and to return to the sacred axis of being.”

>>24480725 (OP)
Stupid Nazi

>nigger brained spurges enters thread rambling and yelling at clouds

how about you tame you lunar principal and try that again buttercup before i blast your mind with atlantean hyperborean vril

>>24480768
Fake quote. Now you're sharing fake quotes and attributing it to Evola.

Nazis don't have a problem with people dying.

>>24480765
This.

>>24480725 (OP)
Jeez, can evola ever not larp as a mystic?

>>24480796
>>24480765
you dumb fucking niggers jesus do you ever do anything other than parrot reddit posts?

>Christianity is at the root of the evil that has corrupted the West. This is the truth, and it does not admit uncertainty. In its frenetic subversion of every hierarchy, in its exaltation of the weak, the disinherited, those without lineage and without tradition; in its call to "love", to "believe", and to yield; in its rancor toward everything that is force, self-sufficiency, knowledge, and aristocracy; in its intolerant and proselytizing fanaticism, Christianity poisoned the greatness of the Roman Empire. Enemy of itself and of the world, this dark and barbarous wave remains the principal cause of the West's decline.

also he wasnt a nazi either retards, not that i care

>>24480787
The west has fallen, billions must die

>>24480725 (OP)
Evola sounds interesting. How do I begin with Evola?

>>24480787
He wasn't a nazi you fucking mongoloid, he escaped them by jumping out of a fucking window at one point.

>>24480831
Not a nazi, just agrees wholeheartedly with nazi ideas

>>24480832
Not at all, and just like the other guy I wouldn't care if he was. Shove your moralising up your arse.

>>24480832
he literally doesnt, you would know that if you ever read anything from him. hes a proper chud and hates everything other than TraditionTM

>>24480831
i just finished revolt and moved to tiger and i already have holy grail and hermetic traditions on my stack. hes a really great read since hes equal parts insane mysticism and yet everything makes perfect sense.

he doesn't seem worth reading based on these excerpts

>>24480831
also i cant find his more esoteric and entertaining quotes on the interwebs but revolt felt like reading a PKD book. starts out a little out there, then gets so crazy you wonder what the fuck is going on, and then finishes with tying everything together and somehow makes it all make sense

>>24480848
> t. casteless ancestorless chthonic lunar path pleb without a single rite to his name

>>24480725 (OP)
>>24480725 (OP)

Hes giving an example of how chivalry *isnt* typically christian and instead managed to embody Tradition despite christianity. he likens it to pre-christian Traditional societies and that 1-6 list are the ways its *not* christian

he makes a lot of references to india and china and some to islam and christianity isnt central to the book at all

he unironically wishes for a world akin to warhammer 40k where a priest/god king rules a spiritual feudal Sacred Empire society organized by castes and with women in their place making babies and being good wives while sects of spiritual warrior-knight ascetics fight wars for higher purposes than themselves

he thinks nation-states are stupid because they are just used to trick the masses by making them believe they are supporting Tradition but really they are just being engaged with a revolution

he thinks caring about race is dumb because if youre at the point of trying to hold your society together solely with the homogeny of its race its doomed to fail anyway since racial bonds arent strong enough. in a Trve Sacred Empire there is a "race of the spirit" that bring people together without destroying their differences which he points out countries only need to force authoritarian conformity and standards because there is no natural organic bonds between the peoples of said country

I only read The Hermetic Tradition and his BF's Crisis of the Modern World. Where should I go from here?

>>24480734
>The blood of the heroes is closer to God than the ink of the philosophers and the prayers of the faithful
Then why the fuck did you write books instead of enlisting

>>24480937
>why didnt he enlist and die for groups he fundamentally disagreed with on every level

its a mystery future sages will have to answer

>>24480942
The true warrior fights not for others but for himself. It's an inwards act; like philosophy, which is an act of self-reflexion, completely inwardly. A true warrior would fight a war for the sake of fighting a war.

>>24480946
not in evolas opinion, whats so hard to understand about that. he would call you (which wars did you fight?) a mercenary or a Dionysian man who fights for the sake and experience/adventure of it without any deeper meaning.

at the very least the trve olympian solar warrior is absolutely not going to be cucked into fighting a war he doesnt care about because some cuck faggot tries to cancel him on twitter about it

>if you dont fight for your enemies you lose

>>24480962
>>24480946
also to add, at no point did evola call himself a solar warrior. hes also not a sacred god king or a slave but he talks about them as well. hes a philosopher, hes not giving accounts of his personal life

>>24480962
I haven't read Evola but I've read the quotes here and seems to me like he would agree, if he thought about it logically. Do you think knights really cared about what they were (materially) fighting for? Did Socrates really care whether or not Boetia was aligned with Athens? Did El Cid care whether or not he was fighting for a Moor or a Christian? He fought for both! Charles Martel cared about the principles of power and bravery and nothing more, when he led his knights at the Battle of Tours he did not do so for his principles.

>>24480993
yes he would care because he says so. warriors fight as a part in the hierarchy of a Traditional society and arent blood thirsty individualists doing whatever they want

feudalism is characterized by its two way street of duties and its what separates it from other forms. a worker has his place and duty and so does a warrior and so does a priest and so does the king. to betray your duty is sacrilege since it goes against the sacred order and is the same as being casteless which is the worst thing of all.

he preaches for an ordered society but one where everyone is respected in their role and not simply a faceless cog in the machine like with capitalisms or masses like in democracy. warriors have oaths to fulfill, what do you think a king would think of his sworn protectors going over and fighting for the enemy against him for fun?

>>24481023
You have no understanding at all over the metaphysics of war. Was Alcibiades a "Dyonisian man"? Was he a "blood-thirsty individualist"? King Leonidas disobeyed orders by fighting at Thermopylae. Charles Martel dethroned the dynasty planted there by the Romans themselves. Should at all these men be regarded with disdain, as casteless?

>>24481036
retard i didnt talk about your examples because they are completely different than what you started the argument over (why evola didnt go fight in a war between capitalists and revolutionaries). youre just bringing up random unconnected examples to try to jew your way into a "victory"

you asked why evola didnt join the capitalists and revolutionary modern war of machines.

1 because he despises all of those things
2 because hes not a warrior in the same way hes not a king or a slave

what does leonidas have to do with any of this at all (who evola would agree with since he thinks the highest form of kings are the priest-kings and that even warrior kings should make the priest caste subservient to him which is a reason he talks about hating christianity since it fought european kings for control until it finally "won" but then couldnt even capitalize on it because the church is a feminine lunar entity)

>>24481048
>modern war of machines.
Retards been crying about "war of machines" since the bronze age. Spartan king Archidamus III, when seeing artillery, claimed that manly valor was now dead.

>When he saw the missile shot by a catapult, which had been brought then for the first time from Sicily, he exclaimed, "Great Heavens! man's valour is no more!"

The examples aren't unrelated—they illustrate how men imbued with tradition (not LARPers like Evola) saw warfare. Notice how their notion of warfare is drastically different from that Evola. Again I ask you, were they individualists à la modernsim?

>>24480734
>“The best and most authentic reaction against feminism and against every other female aberration should not be aimed at women as such, but at men instead.
Probably the ONLY thing of his I've ever read and agreed on.
Everything else in that post is just romanticism for military history that ignored the truth.

>>24481450
>one catapult is bad
>archers are bad
>armies and battles of nothing but catapults and archers are the same thing

>>24481069
>they illustrate how men imbued with tradition (not LARPers like Evola) saw warfare

>these same men think mechanical warfare is unhonorable just like evola

youre just being any annoying redditor faggot contrarian looking to disagree with everything thats said without even fucking knowing what youre talking about which you already admitted.

these arent just opinions evola made and said everything should follow you nigger brained retard, its literally him studying history and Traditional society and pointing out what people and warriors in those societies thought about things such as rule and war. where do you think he got the idea that mechanical warefare is gay huh idiot? its not from his own war experience as you have pointed out. its from reading about war and what historical figures have said about it and looking for patterns.

btw you keep giving wrong examples (because again you have no fucking idea what youre talking and arguing about) and a king is the same thing as a knight-type warrior and to evola dont behave in the same way for reasons i already mentioned but you just ignored

crusaders, jihadists, samurai, whatever that indian warrior caste is are the examples he gives of the warrior type hes talking about where were all real historical things and no reason to bring up random wrong examples to """clap back""" or whatever the fuck you think youre doing


>>24481450
youre a retarded faggot as well

>nooo white men cant ever have had honor! only blacks and browns could have!

knights absolutely were not just common mercenary soldiers and did fight for higher ideas and have codes of conduct no matter how that makes reddit feel

>>24481762
>and a king is not* the same thing

skip evola and read Guénon (PBUH)

>>24481965
im not completely opposed but im going to need a convincing qrd to willingly read a fr*nchmen. from a cursory glance they seem like they would just complement each other well, not a one vs the other type situation

>>24480725 (OP)
>>24480761
A non-bait Evola thread? Based.
>This race was not defined by biology alone, but by a spiritual and metaphysical orientation. The Hyperboreans were said to dwell in a land beyond the North Wind, where the sun never set—a symbolic geography expressing transcendence over time, over becoming.
Do you have the source on this specific line? I would be interested in having it.
>>24480831
>Evola sounds interesting. How do I begin with Evola?
Pic related.
>>24480932
You opened with the heavy artillery, lol. I revisited The Hermetic Tradition after I got filtered a few years ago, and with a lot more study under my belt, it's a godlike book. If you have a strong interest in alchemy and spiritual transformation, you should try his Introduction to Magic books, three volumes in total.
>>24481965
If you have to skip anyone, I'd rather skip Guenon t b h. Guenon was a genius but he had minimal self-control over his emotions, you can immediately tell when he talks about a subject that makes him mad because his prose gets extremely poisonous. He does this often, and being a genius, easily overwhelms the natural defenses of weaker minds. Both Evola and Guenon raise brilliant points, but Evola only raises one or two bad points, whereas Guenon has a whole lot of atrocious takes.

>>24480937
>Then why the fuck did you write books instead of enlisting
He did enlist. Maybe do at least a minimal amount of research next time before speaking.
Your complete inability to understand the post you replied to, of course, will go without comment. It would be wasted on you.

>>24480725 (OP)
Christianity doesn't promote defending traditions, it actually promotes abandoning any traditions of men which contradict the Word of God. I'm also not reading all of that, I lost all interest with the first sentence.

>>24482853
>Christianity doesn't promote defending traditions, it actually promotes abandoning any traditions of men which contradict the Word of God. I'm also not reading all of that, I lost all interest with the first sentence.

yes. try reading evola you nigger retard

>>24480725 (OP)
this shouldn't even grind any adult's gears, societies don't mutate compartmentally like paradox games when you conquer a territory and it changes colo, in much of Celto-Germanic Europe they weren't going to immediately give up on millennia of a certain understanding of life, even today with unprecedented mass education and propagandization it takes at least one generation to effect some important changes let alone back in the middle ages

>>24482826
>This race was not defined by biology alone, but by a spiritual and metaphysical orientation. The Hyperboreans were said to dwell in a land beyond the North Wind, where the sun never set—a symbolic geography expressing transcendence over time, over becoming.

i dont know but its what he talks about in revolt. what specific part are you interested in? i just finished it a few days ago and i remember he also points out that he doesnt mean a race when he says "Aryan" and that he defines it as basically meaning "heroic"

he talks a lot about how different cultures (chinese, india, europe, aztecs) all have a myth about a northern land of superior culture that was Solar aligned

>>24482867
If those are quotes from his writings, then he's a boring retard (like you).

>>24482885
says the nigger retard who cant read and thinks hes dishing out life lessons with his "water is wet" epic speech

>>24480725 (OP)
really good post anon. Looks like a big influx of retards here that can't appreciate good content

>>24482879
>what specific part are you interested in?
The sun symbolism, how a sun that never sets symbolises a triumph over becoming. I have been writing some spiritual poetry with this motif of an unmoving sun for some time, so I was surprised and pleased to see that passage among the quotes.

>>24482939
looks like chapter 24 and 25

>>24482994
why cant you post pdfs on /lit/?

>>24480725 (OP)
Selective understanding of Christianity. Cherry picks the pacifist sounding verses in the Gospels to make Christianity sound dogmatically pacifist and frames medieval knights as Aryans rebelling against this. In reality those knights were thoroughly Christians (specifically Catholic) and looked to the Pope. The biblical verses he cherry picked are limited in scope and already from the time of St. Augustine in the 4th century you had Christians developing theories outlining specific conditions under which war can be just (look up the just war theory of St. Augustine). Not to mention the multiple wars commanded by God in the Bible or St. Paul's statement that "the Prince wields the sword for good, to punish those that do evil". But sure - just make the most simpleminded strawman of Christianity.
>>24480734
The change from warrior to soldier has nothing to do with modernity's moral corruption but rather improvements in military, logistical, and administrative technology that mean armies organised in the modern way are more effective. War in European History by Michael Howard explains this, how the feudal mode of warfare became outdated.

Claims the spiritual authority of the European monastic knightly orders was the "Empire". No it was the Church and the Pope. Cope more.

Blames men for feminism - typical cuckservative talking point. Men have to assume all responsibility and told we can't criticise women when the only way to get them back in line is to fucking shame and criticise them for being whores. Instead everyone says you're just not virile enough you're just not masculine enough leave the poor women alone!! Gay.

So he's basically wrong about everything.

>>24482994
>>24483008
I don't think you can post PDFs anywhere on 4chan atm, since the hack made use of a PDF exploit.
Which book is this? Revolt? Also on which page is the quote you posted? Feeling a bit lazy right now so I'd like to find the exact quote without reading through several pages.

For your knowledge, Evola is still big

>>24483018
i dont know where the quote is from, im just posting the solar part of revolt

>>24483015
shouldnt you be kissing some nigger muslim feet or something? if youre just going to ignore that the church was constantly at odds with the kings and knights own version of a martial christianity there is no reason to talk to you. a single dumb quote doesnt change historical fact

>>24483028
>if youre just going to ignore that the church was constantly at odds with the kings and knights own version of a martial christianity
Why are you lying? I quote Pope Innocent II's letter to the Templar Knights where he encourages them to fight intrepidly against the enemies of the cross:
>Caringly, beloved sons in the Lord, we praise the omnipotent God for you and on behalf of you, because your religious order, your venerable institution is made known throughout the world. Although you were by nature sons of wrath, committed to the pleasures of this age, through inspiring grace you became attentive hearers of the Gospel, having forsaken worldly ostentation and private property, indeed having abandoned the wide path that leads towards death, you humbly chose the hard way that leads to life and in order to justify being considered among the knighthood of God you always bear on your chest the sign of the life-giving cross. In agreement with this is the fact that you, just as true Israelites and warriors most skilled in holy war, are indeed fired up by the flame of charity and fulfill by your deeds the words of the Gospel that says: “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his souls [sic, the text has animis ‘souls’ where is should say amicis ‘friends’]”, whence, in accordance with the words of the great Shepard, you are not afraid to lay down your souls for your brothers and defend them from attacks of the pagans. Also, since you are known by the name of the Knights of the Temple, you were appointed by the Lord to be defenders of the Catholic Church and assailants of Christ’s foes. It is indeed lawful that may you exert in your pursuit and laudable devotion in such a holy deed with all your heart and all your mind. Nevertheless, we encourage your corporation in the Lord, and, for the remission of your sins, by the authority of God and St. Peter, prince of the apostles, we charge you, as well as your those serving you, that you intrepidly fight, invoking the name of Christ, against the enemies of the cross, in order to protect the Catholic Church and to secure that which is under the tyranny of pagans and ought to be rescued from their filth.


>NOOOO BUT I GET TO DEFINE WHAT CHRISTIANITY IS, NOT THE POPE
Lol, cope harder.

>>24483050
>Pope Innocent II
>Second Lateran Council (1139)
>Canon 14: Prohibition, under pain of deprivation of Christian burial, of jousts and tournaments which endangered life.

innocent ii literally said knights got sent to hell for partaking in tournaments. what a great example to bring up to make your point lol

the church hated that kings and knights had their own splinter version of christianity that was focused on being the martial arm of christians and protecting them with the sword. the church thought it was violent and brutish and i dont even think thats the only pope to ever ban or try to ban tournaments

then there is the fact that the french king destroyed the templars because they had their own kinds of christian rituals and wasnt the faggot cucked version of the church built around sucking nigger dick and falling over dead

ignoring that there is also the fact that you see knight-type warriors pop of all over the world in non-christian cultures like samurai and islams shit and the indian warrior caste he talks about

>>24483021
What does the date mean?

>>24483050
you can probably find as many similarly toned messages by presidents from the last centuries about putting martial value at the service of the Good while the latter in turn is equated with the values of the plebeian biomass, peace games and bread

>>24483050
>>24483015
>>24483083
werent christians during romans times known for being ~extreme~ pacifists? how many christians literally got executed because they refused to join the army or fight?

how can you unironically say christianity isnt a cucked pacifist religion? its literally one of the most basic points of it.

and youre calling me deceitful and misleading...shame on you sir! shaaaaame!

*crack*
siiiip
Time for a comfy metaphysical time.

>>24483134
hmm yes. time to head over to /wsg/ for some esoteric fascist hyperborean webums

evola was refuted by both guénon and coomaraswamy, including explicitly on chivalry (!)

>>24483083
Banning tournaments is because these medieval savages would kill each other over minor disputes. It has nothing to do with prohibition of war or embrace of pacifism. The Pope didn't want good men dying for no reason, yet he urged those men to fight for a good cause.
>>24483132
The authoritative doctrines of Christianity and the correct interpretation of Scripture are defined by the Catholic Church. You can't take cherrypicked statements by Jesus that sound pacifistic while ignoring the fact that God commanded war in the Bible, that Jesus used violence against the moneychangers, that St. Paul explicitly said the State is justified in wielding the sword against those who do evil. St. Augustine was the first to outline a philosophical, legal, and moral case for when war can be just. Your uninformed personal opinion doesn't overrule the entire Christian tradition.

>>24483142
RETVRN

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1750459352800054.mp4

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1750263185836469.webm

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1748116386882069.webm

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1748328985096273.webm

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1746460199293247.webm

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1750244560056676.webm

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1747535490959030.webm

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1746742569039741.webm

which way white man?

>>24482034
>im going to need a convincing qrd to willingly read a fr*nchmen
You're functionally illiterate if you haven't read at least one single Frenchman in your life. Way to undermine everything you say, retard.

>>24483218
I would pay a lot for the portrait and sculpture in your pic (if I had money).

>>24483264
just pay some college artist enough for him to buy some weed and have them make it

>>24483218
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1748742847741903.webm

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1747578125304386.mp4

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1747005688711824.mp4

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1740686833672729.webm

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1747522295988986.mp4

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1750044234528032.mp4

refill your vril

>>24481762
>Replying to me twice
>Thinking I'm the other guy who is also calling out the stupidity
>crusaders, jihadist
>warrior type
lmao

can you handle the secret esoteric knowledge? TGIF brother.

>>>/wsg/5860205

>>24483199
>God commanded war in the Bible
jewish demiurge
>Jesus used violence against the moneychangers
jesus chased out the gifajews so ummm war is good actually <— COPE
>St. Paul explicitly said the State is justified in wielding the sword
jew
>St. Augustine
statist coper, once warmongers like ‘saint’ constantine adopted christianity thoughtcels like augustine have spent thousands of pages trying to logic pretzel their way out of the obvious contradiction

>>24482833
He fought for a few months... You would think someone who talked about the "warrior ethos" so much would have led a military life instead of sitting in his attic reading esoteric Sanskrit texts all day.

>>24483802
>shifts the goalposts like a bitch
You may kneel now, dog.

>>24480725 (OP)
What are some books written based on these principles?

>>24484429
You could probably read his Metaphysics of War, and maybe even the first couple of chapters of The Hermetic Tradition (where he outlines the difference between sin/failure myths, and myths where the hero manages to conquer the tree of life and become godlike).
If you want a more modern formulation, you will probably have to look to Evola's Men Among the Ruins, specifically the chapter on the "Order".
Or are you looking for something else? Maybe fiction? Or what?

>>24484429
The specific OP quote is identical to half of what Nietzsche wrote. He's talking about master morality vs slave morality.

>>24484429
bronze age mindset