Scientific Literature:
>Complex to the point of metaphysical redundancy
>Cannot explain why
>Can only explain how
>Can only explain said one thing from a secular perspective
>Is math philosophy, but shits on historical ties to real philosophy
>Direct cause for billions of deaths
>Responsible for the degradation of health and society
>There is no master of science; too much bullshit to read
>No magic, but even more lame and gay for transhumanism instead
Theological Literature:
>Concise; abstract; artistic
>Explains everything
>Is the reason math and science exist
>Is the reason philosophy exists
>Moving, metaphorical, mythical takes on historical events
>Less bullshit to sift through
>Can read everything ever printed and officially accepted for your chosen field within your lifetime
>Has real magic, but it's boring
>Has evil magic, but it's lame and gay and annoying

>>24499979 (OP)

Post 5 books of said scientific literature

What's the difference between theology and philosophy of religion?

>>24499983
Where do you think we are, chump? /gif/ is down the road.

>>24499984
Likely not much. But that's an interesting question to ask. I don't think you read all the other words around those and segmented a sentence together, though.

>>24499989
I skimmed over your post, thought it was total schizo rambling and posted a question that matters to me much more and is vaguely related to your thread.

>>24499995
Okay. Tell me what about it qualifies as schizo. Disprove any singular thing I said, faggot. I hardly spoke more than a normie wiki skimming youtuber would about those subjects. Explain to me in detail what's wrong with it and I will happily concede.

>>24499985
you haven't read scientific literature
/Thread

>>24500006
Starts with the first words, there is no such divide you postulate and no such thing as scientific literature.

>>24500020
I'm not here to debate asinine shit I just wanted to know what people thought of my compared points. So far, not one person has directly attempted to acknowledge a single one of them. I don't know what anyone is even afraid of. They're passively stated opinions on topics everybody knows about. What's with all you uppity guys coming here and bothering me anyway? Boredom?

>>24500031
>my compared points
Are irrelevant since you pulled them out of your ass

>>24500022
Yeah. I'm not wasting my time arguing semantics with you, you fucking limp weasel. I'll wait for a real person to respond to the thread with interest. I mean you didn't even make an attempt at criticism

>>24500033
Deny reality all you want nigger go jerk off I don't give a fuck. Final (You). What a lame smarmy fag you must have to be to talk like that over such boring subject matter fuck off

>>24500031
Still can't explain why and you can't explain how.

>>24499979 (OP)
It's almost like all of these forms of writings have different goals

>>24499979 (OP)
>my_source_is_I_made_it_the_fuck_up.gif
ok

>>24500006
>Disprove any singular thing I said
You would have to prove a single thing you said first.

You can start with trying to prove science has killed more people than its saved since fertilizer alone has demonstrable fed far more people that would have otherwise starved to death than prayer fixed famines.

>>24500035
>here is a wholly semantic argument
>just try to disprove it
>NO, YOU CAN"T USE SEMANTICS TOO

>>24500037
>Deny reality
Maybe he should pray on it to king demon so he doesn't burn forever over some minor misunderstanding.

science was a mistake

>>24499979 (OP)
>Care to explain?
this just reads like you're schizophrenic and/or retarded.