>/lit/ says Peterson bad, whore daughter, Jewish handlers, crybaby, junkie, etc
>read Maps of Meaning
>incredibly well written theological analysis of cognitive mechanisms behind meaning, and their societal implications
>read part of pirated 12 Rules for Life copy
>self-help for glop normies, clearly not meant for a well-read audience, just trying to help braindead normalfags that don't even wipe their own ass
>watch some of his theology-focused lectures, old and new
>matches audience's level of understanding well, does absolutely not talk in circles
>sometimes emotional and dramatic, but intellectuals were never known for their emotional stability

Why do we hate this guy again? He will be recognised as one of the Greats by 2090 /lit/, along with Nietzsche and Schopenhauer.

>>24512639 (OP)
His performance contra Zizek (who is no intellectual powerhouse) was pathetic

>>24512639 (OP)
> He will be recognised as one of the Greats by 2090 /lit/, along with Nietzsche and Schopenhauer.
LMAO it was good bait but this is too much

>>24512639 (OP)
>He will be recognised as one of the Greats by 2090 /lit/, along with Nietzsche and Schopenhauer.
One shudders to wonder what /lit/ will have had degraded to by 2090.

>>24512669
>we made it so far, but we're not out yet!

>/lit/ says Peterson bad, whore daughter, Jewish handlers, crybaby, junkie, etc

And you don‘t even try to address these points.

The autists stimming themselves by repeating the same nonsensical vitriol about Peterson, thread after thread for year after year, are pathetic ideologues and resentful idiots. His best feature is that he gets them to out themselves as such.

>libtard /lit/
Seethes that Peterson turns them into reactionaries by pointing out their bullshit.
>pseud /lit/
Thinks cynically dunking on mass media meant for a general audience is a sign of intelligence.
>chud /lit/
Thinks he's part of a Jewish conspiracy preventing them from having sex.
>tranny /lit/
Thinks he's a "literal nazi."

>>24512639 (OP)
just go straight to jung instead.

>>24512639 (OP)
>He will be recognised as one of the Greats by 2090 /lit/, along with Nietzsche and Schopenhauer.

>>24512639 (OP)
"Well, bucko, let’s get this straight: Lobsters, you see, they’ve got a serotonin-based dominance hierarchy, just like us. It’s archetypal, millions of years old! Ever read Dostoevsky? Crime and Punishment—that’s the weight of existence, man. (Pauses, voice cracks) I was up at 3 a.m., wrestling with the chaos of my own psyche, trying to make sense of it all. You ever confront the dragon of chaos? Clean your damn room, it’s a start!"

>>24512748
meds. these points rarely get mentioned. no one says hes a nazi or critizises him for talking for a general audience. he doesnt point out 'libtard bullshit' but he does get shit for le jewish handlers because 4chan. hes shit because he talks in circles, speaks a lot but doesnt actually get his point across and is bad in discussions in general.

JIDF asset went weewoo

>>24512863
>no one says hes a nazi
Newfag.

>>24512639 (OP)
I don't hate him, but I don't like him anymore. I remember back when he was doing that self authoring program (which was inspired in the work of James Pennebaker, who might actually end up being remembered as someone who made great advances in psychology, but that isn't really my point here), and he directly said that people on 4chan would get a discount on it, that he would help them out, and that he was an uni professor and a scholar of multiple fields and so on and so forth. He got all that data, all those things, and what did he do with it?
>>read part of pirated 12 Rules for Life copy
This stupid fucking book that is basically a bunch of bullet points taken from a psychology textbook with some stupid story telling behind because people are too retarded to get an actual intro to psychology textbook open and read the fucking thing.
That is my only issue with him, other than that, I don't really care. I did like reading his Maps of Meaning book, and I did watch some of his Bible lectures, and they were good. Particularly Maps of Meaning gave me a lots of insights on how my parents think of things.

>>24512649
Zizek is a vaxx gatekeeper who sold out Agamben to the dogs

>>24512639 (OP)
He's a shabbos goy industry plant

The only reason you know about what he has to say at all let alone care about it is because jews put him front and center in the alternative media for impressionable young men to focus on and be moulded by

>>24512639 (OP)
I think he's just a therapist. He can't really analyze social structures or politics too deeply, so he will be rather foolish and not know what's really happening. He's probably not paranoid enough to know the truth as well, too well adjusted and normal. He's a good therapist and well intentioned.

>>24512639 (OP)
Get your dick in my ass, bucko!

his championing of israel, jews, and hatred of anonymity and wanting to censor the internet really turned me against him when before i was indifferent.

now he is just an embarrassing former drug addict who cries and turns red for some reason

he really has brought nothing new to the table and was most likely a psyop to try and get what was then alienated alt right lost boys to go back to the gop plantation.

>>24512639 (OP)
>Sucking Carl Jung's cock.
Gay.

>>24513007
Don't knock til ya tried it

>has degenerate sexual dreams about his dead grandmother
>decides to write about them and publish them
>???
>profit

>>24512639 (OP)
He moreso gets flak for his behavior and statements in more recent years (after his benzo incident and recovery). This, in addition ot his wife getting cancer during this time and the general whirlwind surrounding his life sort of broke him and he has barely recovered from the pit he was in mentally. I don't blame the man for cracking in the ways he has, but the point stands that he simultaneously has less resolve, but also much more venom to his bite than he used to. Makes him more divisive and confrontational than he used to be, which somewhat takes away from his contructive analysis and reasonable, minimally emotionally vitriolic manner of reasoning at times. Even in the times where he can hold himself together, he occasionally gets lost in analysis to the point of overanalysis, and thus almost forgetting what he was arguing to begin with (watch Jubilee's Jordan Peterson vs 20 Atheists (pic related) to see what I mean. You will quickly realize why they changed the name from the original title of One Christian vs Twenty Athiests...)

Again, this wouldn't even be as bad as it is if it weren't for the fact that he tweets at random people telling them how it would be a pleasure to beat them to a pulp for making shitposts about his daughter's son, but then in the next breath cry on national television after being asked one question.

People are tired of this previously absolutely surgically bleeding edge intellect becoming more of an unstable borderline grandstander at times, due to basically his entire mainstream platform being telling people how to live their lives, when he can barely keep his shit together. Again, I feel for him, but it is what it is.

>>24513007
Jung is worth being intellectualy gay for desu

>>24512669
Panpsychic analysis of themes of murder and loss in Dr. Seuss' Cat In The Hat

>>24512946
And he still mogged him

The problem with Peterson is that he is an interesting clinical psychologist, who insists on being so many things more than a clinical psychologist. He wants to be a philosopher, and a political theorist, and a political commentator, and a businessman, and a general educator, and all of these things all at once using the same boiler plate approach. Liberalism coupled with Jungian psychology can go pretty far with psychology and mythological analysis, but it fails once it enters the political arena because the guy ends up calling everyone who disagrees with his sentimental liberalism and metaphorical but only metaphorical religious sympathy a psychopath when they are quite obviously not. He himself has said that psychopathy is actually quite rare. So which is it? Is psychopathy rare or are all these illiberals psychopaths? Both can’t be true and if it’s the latter, it undermines his clinical psychological thinking which is the bedrock of his entire project. So Peterson just shoots himself in the foot over and over again every time he tries to take what really should be a niche psychology for treating patients clinically and tries to turn it into some kind of political and religious program.

speaking of
does his daughter have an onlyfans?

lmao

>>24513007
What a pointless stupid post. I want you to know that you are board cancer.

>>24512928
Yeah. He just wanted to help young guys but he sold his stupid ""program"" (just a series of questions for data collection) for like 10 dollars. He had a similar personality test. I listened to his podcasts recently and there's an ad every 10 minutes or so. His money grubbing is inexcusable at this point. The worst is one of his lectures I listened to. Everyone in the crowd is hyped for him to be there. And he spends the first 5 minutes, which is a long time, shilling his self authoring program. As if everyone in the crowd hasn't already heard of it 100 times. And he does it as if 'hey here's this thing I was just thinking about.' He always acts like he's just talking off the cuff when he repeats his script for the 1000th time.

topkek

>>24512639 (OP)
His whole body of work and behavior makes more sense when you realize that he was diagnosed as schizophrenic, which his family played off as him just being off his meds and depressed about his wife. He's an untreated schizo slowly falling apart in public while his daughter makes bank.

>>24512639 (OP)
once you get to 2020 and beyond you'll see the rapid cognitive decline

>>24512748
but what about
>/pol/ /lit/
lmao just kidding, they never read books

>>24513595
>that he was diagnosed as schizophrenic
kek is this real...i feel like thered be some more obvious public indication if true...how hasnt he wandered off from hearing the voices...

>>24513071
>absolutely surgically bleeding edge intellect
In retrospect he wasn't anything special even before his comatose state
He was just the right man at the right time post-gamergate and Trump

>>24512639 (OP)
Why is he so red though? Did the tv team fuck with his makeup? Is he dying?

>>24513742
blood welling up in his face. also happens to me when I cry. it's embarrassing, but it's normal

>>24512946

Has he apologized at all for this?

>AHHH WHY DIDN'T I JUST SAY I WAS CHRISTIAN!

>>24513071
He is emblematic of a larger trend in "modern thought". Conservatives are so starved for thought leaders, the bar has fallen through the floor.
In isolation, Jordan Peterson is indeed one of the better conservative thinkers of today... but unfortunately, he is still dwarfed intellectually anytime he is in the same room as someone else.
This guy is largely incoherent when he attempts to defend his positions against anyone even moderately informed. His debates with Zizek and that whole Jubilee "vs. 20 AtHeIsTs" slop are startling.

>>24513239
He is right tho. Jung is for gay faggots

>>24513148
Pynconesque

>>24512639 (OP)
>Juden peterstein actually sells busts of him self
Considering this shabbos kike gobbler is a psychologist why hasnt he diagnosed himself as narcissistic faggot.

>>24513636
What's the difference "/pol/ /lit/" and "chud /lit/"?

>>24514027
Another cancerous post.

>>24514062
I actually argued that narcissism was healthy in small amounts.

>>24513629
you ever wonder knowing all that Jungian schizo stuff would eventually bear down on those who have knowledge of it?

>>24513693
>Frightened he would kill himself, Peterson transferred to a public hospital in Toronto in November, where he was diagnosed with schizophrenia.
https://web.archive.org/web/20250105055350/https://www.thetimes.com/article/jordan-peterson-depression-drug-dependency-daughter-mikhaila-rehab-russia-0xtz2ph32?region=global

>>24513965
He's a liberal.

biological reductionalism has no respect for biology itself or seagrass if you would like to hear my humble opinion that goes for like e o wilson too theology reductionism too is a thing i would also say too as it were

>>24512748
how did that tall & handsome man on the right fall for such a half jewish, ultra neurotic, sick, ugly woman on the left? Is hoeflation that broootal today?

>>24514488
makes sense given those stories from old students of his that he'd have full on screaming meltdowns if people entered his classroom before a lesson started

>>24512639 (OP)
>why do we hate him again
/lit/ is full of envious pseudo intellectuals that piss and shit themselves if you go against the academic consensus or online zoomer hivemind of what is good.

Iain Mcgilchrist, ken wilber, fritjof capra, Bernardo Kastrup, David Bentley hart, and Johnathan haidt are all other important authors of our time that will be remembered in the future but normies can’t recognize that which is truely meaningful when it is actually in front of them. Someone will probably respond to my post with an envious attempted takedown but they will just prove my point by doing to.

normies do not even read gurdjieff

>>24514574
Fun fact: I come from the future and no one gives a shit about Peterson.

>>24512639 (OP)
The thing with Peterson is that he's not wrong about most of the things in modern society he rails against. A lot of young people are lonely, isolated, directionless, and aren't fulfilling what used to be considered basic life goals. His problem is that he's angry about all the wrong things. Instead of blaming modern societies ills on unfettered capitalism, alienation, modern technology, social media, car centered urban design, etc. he just rants about some woke leftist cultural Marxist tranny boogieman that he's made up in his mind as being the primary factor behind everything wrong today. Granted, 'wokeism' and culture war bullshit is an annoying problem but it's at most a symptom and not the cause. Peterson is ultimately like a doctor telling his patient they've got cancer because they were watching too much reality tv.

>>24512859
Based

Remember when he cried after being called rabbi by a bunch of jews?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeAWbUl22FU

>>24512950
>for impressionable young men to focus on and be moulded by
Molded into what?

>>24513002
>was most likely a psyop to try and get what was then alienated alt right lost boys to go back to the gop plantation.
As opposes to what? Them being neets?

>>24514601
What's also strange is that his 'cure' for these problems is to simply lecture people to take on responsibility and go to Church despite the fact he himself is not a committed Christian and his mental state is clearly a mess. He might filter his thoughts through flowery Jungian language but his message really isn't very different from most of the other rightwing commentators out there.

What separates Peterson from them, in addition to the pseudo-philosophical babble, however, is that he views himself as an almost Messianic figure. Not that I think Peterson thinks of himself as the second coming of Christ but he clearly thinks he's some kind of savior sent from God to save the modern west from the "post modern neo Marxists" and the "woke left". I think in another life he would've made a great cult leader if he hadn't gone into academia. But at least you can buy his new gospel for only $12 on Amazon

>>24513714
>In retrospect he wasn't anything special
Could you do the same thing then?

>>24514628
Being antisemitic nationalists.

>>24514488
I’ve always found his general behavior odd and fake, but being schizo really does explain a lot of things about him and his family.
>>24514601
>>24514634
I imagine “postmodern neomarxists” are what he labels the voices in his head. Did he ever list examples of famous “postmodern neomarxists”?

>>24512649
peterson thought he was about to debate some crazy "marxist" but zizek turned out to be some esoteric "marxist" that has nothing to do with the weirdos on the college campuses. i was really looking forward to the debate because i like peterson and wanted to see some good counter arguments but the "debate" quickly turned into a civil conversation. the only thing it did was raise my respect for peterson and spark my curiosity for zizek. if only he didn't spit that much...

>>24514559
Source?

Clean your room is unironically great advice. I started to make my bed every morning and that helped me get out of depression more than you could imagine. An easy thing to build momentum.

I don't have much of an opinion on Peterson, other than that he seems to speak as though he doesn't care whether he is understood or not. He is either incapable or unwilling to model his interlocutor's preconceptions and level of knowledge before speaking to him. This results in things like the atheist debate pasta wherein he is almost speaking not to the person but to himself in the shower imagining an argument; the purpose of communication is to be understood and he fails at that even if his words are correct once interpreted.

>>24514652
Getting a job won't change that

>>24514512
Ever listened to that guy talk? He's completely braindead. A beautiful, empty husk of a person.

>>24512639 (OP)

>>24514672
Isn't making your bed a very basic thing to do?

>>24514688
Gem

>>24514688

Nice one, Punchy!

>>24512639 (OP)
>>Why do we hate this guy again?
He's kind of dumb and cooked his own brain

>>24514574
Amen. Average 4trans poster should stick to Professor Dave videos.

>>24514672
It is not, it is a bit stupid considering that everyone usually does that before they end up getting bad. Most of those advice aren't anything out of the ordinary, this is akin to saying, exercise is good for you, and you should also go to the gym.
Isn't it obvious that it will be good for you? He is ridiculous at this point and he is taking people for retards. The problem when you aren't good is always the how, because it is not like people don't know what they need and have to do, but they just can't do it somehow. Psychologists probably are biting more than they can chew. This is the real thing, they can't solve this shit by themselves.

>>24513002
>hey buddy dont let the state dictate pronoun usage
>hey guy let the state collect your ids before shitposting
>hey buddy dont let the state draw lines on speech
>hey guy we need to censor those bloody frogs and their 2007 microsoft Paint memes

>>24512639 (OP)
Can you explain to me what getting molested by his granny via getting tickled by a bunch of her ripped out pubes was all about? What did he mean by this?

>>24514688
lmao

>>24514655
>Did he ever list examples of famous “postmodern neomarxists”?
Pic rel. Lmao

>>24515388
Wow, the cause of all our contemporary problems in one tweet, nice work JP lmao. How do stop Foucault from spreading the gay plague!?!

>>24512639 (OP)
>when she asks you how big your fully erect dick is and the kindergarden teacher walks in

>>24515388
Damn, old Baldy McAids triggered Peterson so badly he even mentioned him twice.

>>24512639 (OP)
>cognitive mechanisms behind meaning, and their societal implications
Anglo philosophy is such a soulless materialistic husk that the best it can do is try to scientifically deconstruct its own priors. If memerson didn’t get filtered by Nietzsche, he would know the latter retroactively refuted this already.

>>24514062
That’s the best image I’ve seen in a while.

>>24514688
I love ai

It’s like, the normal way for a man to masturbate is to use his hand and sort of stroke his erect penis up and down. But a progressive homosexual here might say — a progressive homosexual who’s very likely strongly influenced by all this postmodern and neo-Marxist bloody nonsense that’s al the rage in academia and modern leftist politics today, I might add — well, you might have this homosexual sitting here going, “What about sticking your finger up your ass? That could be masturbation, too, since after all we all know the male g-spot is in the anus.”
It’s like, bloody hell, man, at that point why don’t you just stick your whole bloody fist up there! That’s chaos, man. It’s NOT order! And it is NOT. A path. You want to go down, believe me, I would know. It’s like, bloody hell man, what are you going to do next? Get a dildo or vibrator to insert in your rectum to masturbate that way? You know bloody damn well you shouldn’t be doing that, and yet some people are tempted to do it anyway, and I think, sadly, this comes from the nagging and discouraging of men today that’s so popular in the mainstream media, leftist politics, and academia, where natural male desires like developing their competence to end up at the top of various hierarchies, to acquire wealth to provide for themselves and their family, and to be sufficiently strong or powerful to be able to protect themselves and their close loved ones, or even their nation as the case may be — well, we have all the postmodern neo-Marxists here browbeating and nagging men for these natural desires as manifestations of a “harmful patriarchy”!
So (*chokes up*), this might be why you might have more men today … (*bites fist and holds back a sob for a moment*) more young men today, who feel the world is so against them, that they’re sitting here with their finger up their ass … or even the whole fist! It’s bloody tragic, you know (*sniffles*).

I actually like and respect JBP overall, while having my disagreements with him in other parts.

>>24514665
debates are meant to be civil
what you want seems to be internet personalities yelling interruptions over eachother and getting salty, please correct my assumption if I am wrong.

>>24516064
nah you're right. but i hope you get what i mean. instead of a (civil) confrontation it was more like a conversation. well some people in the comments of the yt video said zizek "owned" him so subtly and intellectually that peterson didn't even notice it but from my impression zizek seems like a really decent guy who actually detest brutish and unproductive dominance plays like that

>>24514634
>What separates Peterson from them, in addition to the pseudo-philosophical babble, however, is that he views himself as an almost Messianic figure. Not that I think Peterson thinks of himself as the second coming of Christ but he clearly thinks he's some kind of savior sent from God to save the modern west from the "post modern neo Marxists" and the "woke left". I think in another life he would've made a great cult leader if he hadn't gone into academia.
I don’t like this excessive use of “cult leader” or some conception of it where it doesn’t apply, not just by you specifically but generally.
People need meaning, and sometimes a charismatic speaker or thinker, typically in a field of the humanities, speaking about social issues, or psychology as Peterson does, but also interspersed with a broad knowledge of the humanities and topical issues of the current day, is what helps give it to them. We need teachers. Humanity in general does.
To call him a “cult leader” for that - well, maybe a good “cult leader” is exactly what some people need. If you wanted to criticize the Boy Scouts, you could call them a cult, but it’s generally a benevolent one which does good things for young boys, teaches them discipline and survival skills and socialization and teamwork etc. Charismatic or influential figures in the humanities, art, literature, or politics likewise. I’m not comparing his position in world history or Western thought generally to someone like Plato or Socrates, but you could call either of them a “cult leader” dismissively, which just doesn’t do it for me.

Peterson also IS essentially a celebrity of some considerable status now, with a sizable audience, and still some occasional attention in the mainstream media, then some decently big presence in alternative media, so he actually does have some “importance” to this extent. If he knows this, takes this into account and also wants to make sure he uses his platform to contribute some good things to the world, and to speak out against concerning trends, I wouldn’t call it “thinking of himself as a messiah.” It’s just an understanding of his situation and even a sense of responsibility to Western culture, and the young men he evidently sincerely wants to help and who are a significant bulk of his fan-base.

>>24516085
>well some people in the comments of the yt video said zizek "owned" him so subtly and intellectually that peterson didn't even notice it
Just about. The fallout from that debate all but destroyed both Peterson's academic credibility and career.

>>24516254
huh

>>24512756
/thread

>>24514691
you have no idea how bad of a start zoomzooms have

>>24516254
Have you watched his debate with Zizek?

Zizek spent the entire debate subtly pointing out the fact that Peterson has not (either fully, honestly, or even at all) engaged with any of the material he both esposed and criticized.
In fact people often neglect the fact that he originally was the one who called him out for his apologetical posturing by pointing out the fact that he had never even read On Orthodoxy by Chesterton.

His credibility among both scholars, critics and his academic peers was severly damaged in the aftermath despite his subsequent growth in popularity as a public figure.

>>24516136
>I don’t like this excessive use of “cult leader” or some conception of it where it doesn’t apply
Sure.
>People need meaning, and sometimes a charismatic speaker or thinker
So a cult leader?

>>24512639 (OP)
A tall oak rises, its root in earth, its head amidst the skies, whose form appears from the highest of hills, against which darts upon darts of hatred rain as before the flood, the mob bending their bows, unmoved, its root braving the storm, not a leaf falling, only tears for those who have eyes but see not, those who have ears but hear not, those whose rooms untidy.

>>24516489
xcucks have been even worse parents than boomers, it's incredible.

>>24514620
Israel-loving, neoconservative beasts-of-burden.

>>24513007
The only thing this guy did of any worth was get young men to read Jung.

>>24515576
Kek. He's right to hate Baldy McAids. He has left a legacy of evil and retardation. He has the worst fans.

>>24512639 (OP)
Peterson is alright. Most of the people who criticize him for "Peterson bad, whore daughter, Jewish handlers, crybaby, junkie, etc" are just mad Nick Fuentes zoomers.
That being said, I'm not sure if he'll be remembered for very long.

>>24512639 (OP)
Post coma he's been in a downward spiral. He's completely in right wing grifter mode:

>Audience Captured
>Excuses audience capture for his peers
>At the same time REEEEingg over what poor college students say
>Almost certainly being paid by Russia
>Endorses Trump
>Is adamantly against post modernism, but believes in dragons
>Refuses to engage in hypotheticals if he doesn't like it

>>24512639 (OP)
YOU BEDEVILED EGG

>>24516922
I thought Jung was a saturn worshipper

>>24517278
>Is adamantly against post modernism, but believes in dragons
lol My favorite thing about Peterson is the fact that his attempt at a philosophy is distinctly postmodernist and he is completely unaware of how hilariously ironic this is due to the fact that he is almost entirely ignorant as to what postmodern philosophy even is.

>>24517278
>>Is adamantly against post modernism, but believes in dragons
how do these two correlate

>>24517278
>>24517305
he is a jungian though

>>24517310
Post Modernism is a rejection of objectivity, yet Peterson can't give a straight answer as to whether dragons exist.

>>24517378
I'm pretty sure he means the Jungian dragon

>>24517382
He literally does, and if not, his contrarian mental gymnastics when trying to explain how dragons are actually real is a fucking joke.

>>24517393
> contrarian mental gymnastics when trying to explain how dragons are actually real is a fucking joke
It’s definitely a joke and you can see people making it in this thread. Just talking the way he does about any symbol comes off as a joke, because it is. By the same power of collective meaning Peterson attempts to use, what comes out of his mouth is so incoherent his “positions” are jokes unto themselves. You can present any topic in a Peterson manner and it reads as a mealy mouthed retard who can’t decide if he’s a living being. Of course he lacks the self awareness to judge himself by his own standards so this insight is beyond his ken.

>>24513002
nah peterson's still based

>>24517485
hasn't been in years

>>24517494
What about that time he said the most intelligent group of humans are the j*ice?

>>24516557
Sure. There can be benevolent or good “cult leaders”. There can be bad ones, too. But some of them play a role in society.

he will be only be remembered as a faggot who twerked for kikes and gave them cover while a genocide was taking place.
he literally cannot function without twerking for shitstein.

>>24517283
Someone should tweet this at him and post his reaction.

>>24513002
>his championing of israel, jews, and hatred of anonymity and wanting to censor the internet really
all of this.
he's a loathsome piece of shit. i started out learning about him from the 200 years together clip ("can't do it" i.e. can't critique the jews for anything) and each thing he has done since then has only solidified him as a stank piece of shit in my view. the best thing he will do is eventually kill himself.

>>24514688
>88
kek and based

juden peterstein

>>24517886
>shitstein
Based

>>24512639 (OP)
I noticed Peterson defenders never talk about his ideas. They talk about him as a person. They talk about his supposed stances in the abstract like caring about boys. They can, like OP vaguely handwave about what he (supposedly) talks about.
But they don’t actually employ any ideas of his. They don’t quote him. They never show up in a general thread with some brilliant insight to a question provided by Peterson.

He exists more like a totem for them to project their ideals upon than derive any wisdom from. If they even read any of his books they certainly didn’t learn anything from them they can apply. They can only insist on the value of the person and ideas.
In this way he occupies the space of a political figure, not a philosopher or thinker.

>>24518260

>>24517290
I just see him as a wannabe mystic who studied esoteric religions after realizing Freud was a fraud. I think he saw them as fertile ground for ideas about how to understand your inner world. I think he genuinely cared for people suffering mental problems so he took all these religious ideas that weren't well known to the average Westerner and synthesized them into something palatable they could easily understand and use to get their heads straight. He was definitely versed in Gnosticism and Kabbalah but I don't see him as a hand-rubbing merchant type. I think he had pretty good intentions.

>>24512649
Zizek literally just showed up and said he wasn't interested in talking about the material in question. I don't understand why this gets spun as a win, but then I don't understand his audience.

>>24518421
>Zizek literally just showed up and said he wasn't interested in talking about the material in question
wasn't the topic 'capitalism vs communism' or something like that? that's indeed boring

Zizek forced me to download a dictionary

>>24518425
I believe it was "debating the communist manifesto"

>>24512851
Can happen! crying has become his thing now. There will be no books by 2090 just vibes.
Him and cardi B will be classic proponents and pioneers of emotional intelligence, founding members of feelings.

>>24518260
That's not true, here are some points I learned from him:
-Clean your room
-Lobsters have serotonin running through their veins
-Don't cry in public
-Don't be a Shabbo Goy
-Archetypes are important
-The Bible is a guide to being a human
-Chaos and Order

>>24518475
>Chaos and Order
This was the only part of Memerson that ever intrigued me at all but it seems like he didn't actually have much to say about this. I would have liked him to elaborate some more fleshed out Empedoclean ontology along these lines.

>>24512639 (OP)
>Can't answer a simple yes or no question

>>24518260
what ideas? flattening Gaza? cleaning your balls?

>>24519144
Many such cases with high IQ individuals

>>24519986
or charlatans.

>>24520014
Yes