In what ways did Marxist attempts at egalitarianism often result in new forms of inequality or widespread poverty?

>>24515599 (OP)
>>24515599 (OP)
it turned both russia and china into superpowers. the collapse of the USSR is more indicative of russians being mongol rape baby subhumans than anything else

>>24515609
That's incorrect. If they were still involved in marxism, they wouldn't have remained a superpower

Read Soviet Marxism by Herbert Marcuse

the platojeet slopper has set his decadent sights on marxism
expect many more threads like this one, o champions of the logos

>>24515783
Worship me piggy

>>24515613
>If they were still involved in marxism, they wouldn't have remained a superpower
first of all, cope. second of all, china is still marxist.

>>24515813
China is not marxist anymore

>>24515816
wrong

>>24515813
>most cutthroat capitalist country in the world is still marxist!
holy cope

>>24515813
>china is still marxist.

In name only

>>24515819
right, bitch

>>24515599 (OP)
I'm not even a Marxist but Marx was not an egalitarian

Marx ideal goes against human nature and crumbles with the slightest push. This is why leftism relies on tyranny to remain in power.

>>24516287
Unlike the stable rule of God, as the Bible teaches us.