>>24534739
>Lewis was not an atheist at all. Was high-church Anglican.
Not that anon, but if he believed their doctrines, then he wasn't even saved, since they teach works for salvation and anyone who is trusting in works, even just getting baptised, isn't saved. It's nothing but the blood of Jesus that cleanses us, not water baptism. I can't be bothered to look up their teaching from around his time, but today the Anglican/Episcopalian church teaches lies.
>Baptism is for the forgiveness of our sins, the giving of the Holy Spirit, and initiation into the Church.
The Bible clearly says it's believing in Christ for the forgiveness of sins.
>Acts 10:43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
If you baptise someone who isn't saved, who hasn't believe the gospel and put all their faith and trust in Christ to be saved (not trusting their own works or their baptism), then you just get a wet bastard (Hebrews 12:8).
>John 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
It's by believing on the name of Christ or putting all your trust in Christ to be saved, not trusting some cold water to save you.
>>24535992
>The Catholic Zohar
