>>24554449 (OP)
No it's not, you alongside many fuel a massive industry that functions around the whole world. Be it ancient, modern, slop, there is nothing countercultural to this consumption.
>>24555861
any semblance of counterculture died 30 years ago, it is now a term with no valuable meaning. You are a nigger. If you tried describing "counterculture" you'd get nothing but, as >>24555838 states, a superfluous expression. Only Unzeitgemässe Betrachtungen come close, but that's a whole different conversation. OP is a massive faggot.
>>24555878 >>24555883 >noun: counter-cultures >a way of life and set of attitudes opposed to or at variance with the prevailing social norm.
Not that hard, buddies...
>>24555973 >a way of life and set of attitudes opposed to or at variance with the prevailing social norm
the point is that there is no such thing as a "the prevailing social norm" rendering it a superfluous or meaningless word. I mean, there's a reason why pamperchu has a large following.
Reading for no reason other than your own pleasure is the true counterculture
In a world where every minute of your time needs to be productive, where people are brainwashed to self improve and embrace a 'hustle culture', the only true counterculture activity is to sit back and read literature
Art for art's sake
Yes I respect women who read slop more than men who read biographies or self-help in pursuit of 'greatness'
>>24556746 >In a world where every minute of your time needs to be productive, where people are brainwashed to self improve and embrace a 'hustle culture'
What world are you living in? brother you need to go outside.
>>24556746
oh the westoid struggle.
No such thing as counterculture, unless you're a slave piggy to that culture. Reading literature has nothing to do with that ugly tendency you find in some people, it's countering nothing of it because it does not involve itself with it. Literature for itself, art for art's sake, has nothing to do with your little culture and thus has no need to counter it. Faggot.