Thread 24568740

>100+ year book with multiple revised editions has a typo
...how?

what if it's a secret massage

>>24568771
>"This book is edited by indians"

>>24568740 (OP)
'eastars on the 'og

>>24568740 (OP)
Share one example.

>>24568781
>tasteles twitter smutt in some generic artstyle
Distasteful, anon-san...

>>24568740 (OP)
What if it's not actually a typo and you just don't understand the language.

>>24568783
I'm not gonna remember where but I was just reading Faust and I saw 2 of 'em
>>24568789
I'm not from third world like you so it's [just[ not possible...

>>24568740 (OP)
it was a stylistic choice by the author

>>24568788
proper legoshi smut is rare
shame because I feel like paru's artstyle isn't that difficult to emulate
yare yare....

>>24568797
It's translated...

>>24568801
Smut is bad. Stop thinking with your dick and be elegant. Needless gross eroticism is why people are repulsed by most internet sub-cultures.

>>24568812
maybe that dumb wolf should stop being so fucking sexy and I will

>>24568832
Sadly, putting your dick inside anuses irl is way more empty than your stylized idea of it. People aren't worth much and pussies are made for breeding.

psy op
take my word for it

>>24568740 (OP)
I have a copy of Three Men in a Boat (1889) loaded with typos. Picrel. It was part of some newspaper's book club program in 2004. I imagine they used some garbage OCR on a public domain (or British equivalent) copy and didn't bother editing it. Great book, would recommend, very funny and comfy.

>>24568783
Not OP, but I found one error in Storm of Steel(Michael Hofmann) page 93. Pic related.

In the same book I also believe I found a mistranslation where a sentence made no sense given the context, but I never took a pic.

>>24570999
>used some garbage OCR on a public domain (or British equivalent) copy and didn't bother editing it
Some publishers exist only to make bank off this and you have no idea how much I hate them

>>24571237
That's not an error

>>24572264
What makes you think it is not? I am ESL; however, I have never seen "it belonged to there", only "it belonged there". I checked with grammarly and openai, and both stated it was an error.

>>24572576
maybe is it old english?

>>24568740 (OP)
there are literally computer and printing press errors that cause each individual book to have a couple typos on average

>>24570999
I don't see the typo

>>24574473
>Your spirit is
>at
>one with hers

>>24574473
>>24575327
>and you stretch your
>anus
>to them

To be fair this one could be a faggot fetish of the author and he really might have meant "anus" and not "arms"

>>24575331
And yes, I have not read "Three Men in a Boat" (I believe I read an excerpt of it as a kid but that was too long ago to remember) but even the title sounds gay enough for it to be plausible.

>>24573157
and the rest isn't?

>>24572576
It is anthropomorphizing a place.
You have heard belongs to me or or belongs to some person. Like that funny manga image of This hole belongs to me?
The smell belongs to some place.-> It belongs to there.

>>24575397
That could be the case, and then it would technically be correct. Although, I doubt that was the intention, as no other form of anthropomorphism occurs, and it just does not fit his writing style. Maybe somebody could check the original german text or another translation to disprove me.