Would yhe binble hold up in modern times if it was sold as a companion, or standalone book for an established fantasy world, serving as lore or backstory?
Similar to The Silmarillion.

The thing is, that the bible and every religious book is the fantasyslop of its time. But people take it so seriously that we tend to forget at times.

>>24572364 (OP)
Probably. It certainly has its literary high points.

>>24572364 (OP)
No said lore would be limited to genesis, exodus, some book here and there from the OT, and the gospels and acts from the NT, with the rest being ethical philosophy that would not flash out the setting further

>>24572392
scoffers burn

>>24572489
See? This is what i mean. There is actually no much difference between a fantasy fandom or a sect of religious fanatics, their antics even comes from institutions all the same; they both are just appreciators of the aesthetics, metaphors, or both, from the source material.

>>24572364 (OP)

>>24572364 (OP)
What's up with atheists and using imaginary alternate scenarios as arguments?
>what if reality was completely different heh what then??

>>24572392
One fat retarded masturbator vs thousands of years of knowledge....

>>24572595
It is knowledge tho? Christian and Judaic philosophy is extremely unpractical and full of bondage, and goes against all common sense because the stories and customs took place under other historical context, it's just a simple observation. Or what, are you going to tell me that the Hammurabi code is knowledge too?
>One fat retarded masturbator
Don't let your anger blind you, there's actually nothing wrong with enjoying religion. I just prefer being pragmatic without getting lost in senseless abstraction of imagination that gets in the way at times.

>>24572593
They are called hypotheticals
How would you feel if you did not have breakfast this morning?

>>24572364 (OP)

>>24572364 (OP)
Most of it's not that interesting if you're not a bronze age goat herder

>>24572364 (OP)

>>24572364 (OP)