Beware of Radical Skepticism - /lit/ (#24573076)

Anonymous
7/22/2025, 7:04:16 PM No.24573076
a paint
a paint
md5: 53d152efad13fd54671c4da3bfb8d36c🔍
>My girlfriend (I mean a friend who is a woman, not a partner or anything like that) was doing her master's thesis on Feyerabend and in the process she got blackpilled so badly that she went full schizo, began to distrust reality itself, dropped out of uni and became a crackwhore.

-Anonymous Tue, Sep 28, 2021 17:39:21 No.19135230
Replies: >>24574422 >>24574623 >>24574906 >>24574940 >>24575122 >>24575478 >>24576179 >>24576205
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 1:19:41 AM No.24574291
bump
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 2:05:12 AM No.24574422
>>24573076 (OP)
thats probably about as good a fate a philospher major could have
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 4:04:05 AM No.24574623
>>24573076 (OP)
good, she probably was a Popperian. we need less of those.
Replies: >>24574952 >>24575338
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 4:07:56 AM No.24574633
spongebob-squarepants-spongebob
spongebob-squarepants-spongebob
md5: a6f819c591a2634abb7cc1c09f13590e🔍
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 6:46:47 AM No.24574906
>>24573076 (OP)
I too know so many University philosophy who would oh so find that image hecking philosophically relatable. All cringe low IQ failures.
So that anons story doesnt surprise me.
Replies: >>24574927
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 6:59:27 AM No.24574927
>>24574906
hylic flesh autonom
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:09:40 AM No.24574940
>>24573076 (OP)
What specifically made her question reality itself? What part of reality? And why did this question result in her deciding to become a Crack Whore?

One doesn't need philosophy to give up on a purpose and simply throw away their life for pleasure.
Replies: >>24575338
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:14:11 AM No.24574952
>>24574623
>Popperian
I cannot understand how people whom claim to be intellectuals can believe that they need an institutional claim that a subject is "evidence" or has "evidence" for them to believe whether it to be true or not.

Logical consistency, critical thinking and questioning on all perspectives eventually leads to what is most likely to be truth.

Popperian's rely on institutional powers which are easily biased or corrupted, and for them to rely mostly on this is laughable.

It's a simple way of saying "i cannot think, therefore I think with others thinking, that has been verified with their accepted thinking"
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 9:23:23 AM No.24575122
>>24573076 (OP)
>I have no way to prove anything around me actually exists ergo I must assume it doesn't and live my life accordingly.
Or you could just assume the opposite until proven otherwise.
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 12:02:57 PM No.24575338
image-20-2567030351
image-20-2567030351
md5: 8a82135da3d57c4344d85638d27f1361🔍
>>24574623
What? Feyerabend wans't popperian. He was a Scientific anti-realist

>>24574940
>>What specifically made her question reality itself?
Pyrrhonism
External World Hypothesis
Brain in a vat
Evil Demon
Problem of Criterion
Replies: >>24575346
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 12:06:13 PM No.24575346
>>24575338
Obviously. That's not what I was saying, retard.
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 1:41:07 PM No.24575478
>>24573076 (OP)
>My girlfriend
stopped reading.
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:08:57 PM No.24576179
>>24573076 (OP)
Literally me
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:14:02 PM No.24576205
>>24573076 (OP)
A singular anecdote doesn't establish a causal link.
Moreover considering any random comment on the internet as trustworthy is peak foolishness.
Third this website is constantly target by interests who want to normalize certain messages in certain populations.