← Home ← Back to /lit/

Thread 24608483

130 posts 30 images /lit/
Anonymous No.24608483 >>24608489 >>24608553 >>24623856 >>24633191
>It’s my belief that the raw material of good art is human sorrow, and when that sorrow is another’s, one has the obligation to treat it with great care and dignity. But I also believe the one who is loved is placed under an obligation. To survive and bear these trials with grace and dignity. Otherwise all our enterprise is a creature of the fates and all our imagination and invention and care will not be enough to save us.
Anonymous No.24608489 >>24608494 >>24625258
>>24608483 (OP)

is that what he said to that 16 year old he fucked all over mexico?
Anonymous No.24608494 >>24608505 >>24608521 >>24619058
>>24608489
explain
Anonymous No.24608505
>>24608494

For the record, she made her own choices, this wasn't a tranny discord type modern situation
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/nov/20/cormac-mccarthy-began-relationship-with-16-year-old-while-42-and-married
Anonymous No.24608521 >>24608570 >>24611263 >>24611272 >>24611573 >>24611866 >>24611972 >>24614460 >>24619065 >>24621261 >>24623782 >>24624791 >>24634667
>>24608494
He was 43, she was 17. The image is startling, possibly illegal. At the very least, it raises questions about inappropriate power dynamics and the specter of premeditated grooming. But not to Britt—who had suffered unspeakable violence at the hands of many men in her young life—then or now.

“I can’t imagine, after the childhood I had, making love for the first time with anyone but a man, anyone but Cormac. It all felt right. It felt good,” she tells me. “I loved him. He was my safety. I really feel that if I had not met him, I would have died young. What I had trouble with came later. When he started writing about me.”

Though trouble also came immediately, according to Britt, in the form of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

“Nobody fucked with Cormac. He just gave off an aura that he was not to be fucked with. The only person I ever saw him be so deferential to was Albert [Erskine]. The day before we left for Mexico, I remember him making a call to Albert. And then Cormac’s whole demeanor changed. [He] got very serious and quiet and said, ‘I appreciate you telling me that. I guess it’s good we’re going to Mexico.’ They hung up and Cormac said, ‘Well, the FBI has paid a visit to Albert. The state of Arizona is looking for you.’

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/story/cormac-mccarthy-secret-muse-exclusive
Anonymous No.24608553
>>24608483 (OP)
>It’s my belief that the raw material of good art is human sorrow,
why?
> But I also believe the one who is loved is placed under an obligation
Why is another beholden to your delusional fantasies?
Anonymous No.24608570 >>24609879
>>24608521
Fuck this article was badly written. Could not have been more of clash of style and subject.
Anonymous No.24609879
>>24608570
move along pard, this is a barney board
Anonymous No.24611263
>>24608521
>He was 43, she was 17. The image is startling, possibly illegal. At the very least, it raises questions about inappropriate power dynamics and the specter of premeditated grooming.
and it changes not one single word of his writings
Anonymous No.24611272 >>24611296
>>24608521
>He was 43, she was 17. The image is startling, possibly illegal.

startling? libs are such fucking fags lmao
Anonymous No.24611296 >>24611310 >>24611866 >>24625640
>>24611272
>Submissive lowercase faggot
The only reason a grown man and a child isn’t startling to you is because you’ve grown desensitized to it. The glowies watching this thread should take a look at your hard drive.
Anonymous No.24611310 >>24611442 >>24611575
>>24611296
i don't even watch porn. i use lowercase because it's easier (i'm a phoneposter). it doesn't imply submissiveness, does it? hell, maybe it does. i'll have to think about that. anyway, you misunderstand me. i think sex is sacred. i object to fornication and adultery and wish these acts were criminally prosecutable. but if an octogenarian and a teenager want to be a couple that is nobody's business but theirs. do notice how this age gap neurosis is chiefly championed by cunty women and feeble men.
Anonymous No.24611442 >>24611470
>>24611310
>do notice how this age gap neurosis is chiefly championed by cunty women and feeble men.
and usually with the aim of socially destroying a masculine man
Anonymous No.24611470 >>24611527 >>24612170 >>24617919
>>24611442
You have a sad idea of masculinity
Anonymous No.24611527
>>24611470
you talk like a frumpy hausfrau.
Anonymous No.24611573 >>24611842
>>24608521
This is so low on my list of things to care about, that I even am outright pissed at the people who are so sanctimonious and outraged over it. (Which, ironically, arguably knocks it up on the list of things I seem to care about, except it’s more defined by how angry I am at stupid reactions to the subject at hand, not the subject/story here itself).
I think they (such outraged, faggot Redditors) become outright EVILLY sanctimonious when they throw around the p-word over age gaps like this. “Pedophile” or “pedophilia.”
Such an age gap is NOT the same as an older guy raping, say, a literal fucking 6 year old girl, which actually falls under the literal and legal definition of pedophilia. Not a fucking 40 year old dating a 17-18 year old. Hell, you even see some of these sanctimonious joyless twats and fags being almost or at least even as outraged and “ew!” “OMG ick EW!!!” if it’s even something like a fucking 25-year-old dating an 18-year-old.

>UMMMM THATS A BIG HECKING AGE GAP BRO, I DONT EVEN SEE HOW I COULD EVER FEEL ENOUGH IN COMMON WITH AN 18YEAROLD TO WANT TO DATE THEM!!! UMMMM, YIKES SWEATY, YOURE IN COLLEGE OR FINISHED IT AND SHES JUST IN HER LAST YEAR OF HIGHSCHOOL!!! PEDO!!!

It’s outright disrespectful to the actual victims of pedophilia. And, besides that, people so outraged over it often typically reveal themselves as exemplars of that great irony and great paradox - namely, that people who are ‘liberal’ or ‘socially progressive’ enough (as they would use those terms, or as they’re used today) bending back on the horseshoe into becoming a similar sex-shaming, bitter, resentful, dried-up, joyless, spiteful, hostile and prunish old prude. The only major difference from the old Victorianisms having to do with sex, being that this new prudishness is especially characterized by contempt, fear, anger and hostility towards men. Wanting to emasculate men, and always looking angrily at situations they can point towards as revealing men as being the toxic bigots/patriarchs/oppressors/rapists/etc. in such situations.

I couldn’t give less of a shit about a roughly 40-50 year old guy having consensual sex with a roughly 16-18 year old girl some many decades ago, particularly if it was consensual (at least in the very moments of it, e.g. the girl wasn’t explicitly saying no and trying to shove him off or claim she’d been raped afterwards), and also particularly not in a way that had left the younger partner feeling traumatized, used, or abused afterwords; but rather instead, even years to decades later, viewed it all as a great relationship to reminisce on fondly.

Hundreds and thousands of years of history back me up on this. Boy, I almost hate how much of a chud the faggot Redditors turn me into.
Anonymous No.24611575 >>24611727 >>24611749
>>24611310
Ezekiel 16:7-8 - God waits until the girl
is grown and "old enough for love."
1 Corinthians 7:36 - Marriage is for those "past their youth."
Deuteronomy 24:5 - Marriage is between two adults who live together.
Genesis 2:24 - Marriage requires maturity-leaving father and mother.
Mark 10:14 - Jesus protects children,
not gives them in marriage.
>inb4 Mary was younger than 17
She conceived Him through a virgin birth. Keep coping.
Anonymous No.24611727 >>24611802
>>24611575
i said post-pubescent girl. you maliciously use the word "child" to distort my argument. show me a bible verse actually condemning age gap relationships.
Anonymous No.24611749 >>24611802
>>24611575
but since girls are attaining puberty way too early let's establish 16 years of age as a civilized threshold. younger than that and sure, kinda sleazy. the age gap thing remains bullshit.

it's funny because i remember the establishment *pushing* for age gap relationships in movies not too long ago. but now they have declared it a taboo and the lemming legions have obediently followed suit. new gag reflex duly installed. direct puritanical ire at healthy male shagging fertile lass. increase shrillness 500% if male happens to be white.
Anonymous No.24611802 >>24611835
>>24611727
>>24611749
Notice how none of these posters contested Scripture, just more coping about societal norms. As if Christ would care about what the world likes or dislikes. “Children” only appears in once in that post, by the way. But keep coping. Remember what your fate is:
“But whoso shall cause one of these little ones who believe in Me to fall, it were better for him that a millstone were hung about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”
Anonymous No.24611835 >>24611840
>>24611802
Yeah Jesus is totally talking about 17-year-olds in that verse. Are you mentally stunted? I'm not even being sarcastic.
Anonymous No.24611840 >>24611862
>>24611835
>you maliciously use the word "child"
Again, “children” appears once in that post. The rest are self explanatory. The nice thing about Scripture is that there is no debating it, unless of course you aren’t a Christian. Then it becomes obvious what you really are.
Anonymous No.24611842 >>24611859 >>24611870 >>24611895 >>24611904 >>24613924 >>24615385 >>24616488 >>24618755 >>24625702 >>24628500 >>24628505 >>24629745
>>24611573
If a 40 year old woman dated a 16 year old boy it would rightfully be viewed as super creepy and probably predatory. This isn't any different. It's not some roastie psyop; people are expected to mature mentally and not just physically, and typically they do. There is nothing a 40 year old has in common with a 16 year old; at that point the girl is essentially a pretty doll with a pulse that breathes that they like to fuck. Mald all you want but it's not gonna fly with most people. The side eyes are warranted.
Anonymous No.24611859 >>24611895
>>24611842
>inb4 muh historical precedent
>inb4 muh hypocritical elites shifting standards
These retards pretend to be all counter-culture then they suddenly start defending Jewish actors dating girls young enough to be their granddaughters. They’re either retards or genuine zionists
Anonymous No.24611862 >>24611863
>>24611840
It's really cool when a guy (you) is dumb and smug at the same time, not to mention gratingly self-righteous. Makes for some delightful conversation.
Anonymous No.24611863 >>24611914
>>24611862
>satantic tard seething
Glad you revealed yourself for what you are.
Anonymous No.24611866 >>24611867
>>24608521
God, I hate faggots like you.

>MUH AGE GAPERINOOOOO
>LE PEDO
>HOW CAN A MAN BE ATTRACTED TO A YOUNG HOT WOMAN?!?
I literally did not know this was an "issue" until ledditors like you bitched, moaned and complained about "literal rape" and "predators" in regards to older men being attracted to young women. I cannot conceive of any other explanation of why this makes people so salty (especially post-wall hags who were passed around the cock carousel by, a lot of times, older men, btw) except jealousy. It's almost always either 1. Dudes who cannot get any girls except maybe post-wall roasties or 2. Older women kvetching about younger women bagging guys their age.


>>24611296
>The only reason a grown man and a child isn’t startling to you is because you’ve grown desensitized to it

How is this even logical? Are you implying porn here? Men throughout all of human history have wanted to bang young, hot women. Faggots always pissing and shitting their pants over age gaperinos are always the same retards that go "YOU GO GUURL! IT'S YOUR LIFE!". This is 100% women thinking infecting everything. Women are so fucking dumb, it's unreal.
Anonymous No.24611867 >>24611907 >>24611917 >>24629984
>>24611866
Notice none of these people can talk on Scripture. More weak appeals to “muh historical precedent” like I predicted earlier. Satan does not send his best, he sends predictable Zionist tards such as these. If they were a tad richer they might have gotten the invite to Jeff’s island. And sailed forth without hesitation.
Anonymous No.24611870
>>24611842
>This isn't any different.
Ummm
Anonymous No.24611895 >>24611906 >>24612505
>>24611842
>There is nothing a 40 year old has in common with a 16 year old
I barely have anything in common with my gf who's 2 years younger than me. As a matter of fact, I don't have anything in common with 99.9% of women I've ever known. Nor do I give a shit. Things in common with a girl is so low on my list of priorities for a partner I'm not even sure what people mean when they say this. Ironically, I would argue this is a much more immature way of looking at romantic relationships.

>zomg!! You like red?! You like my favorite bands?? You like walks in the park?! So do I!!
I'm not even saying you SHOULD fuck 16 year olds. It's always better for a person to have a partner in their similar age bracket, especially when they're young. But I wouldn't say it's a moral claim. I just don't get what the outrage is. That side eye you're talking about are because of feminist talking points infecting the collective psyche that only arose less than 100 years ago.

Which is hilarious considering this faggot >>24611859 somehow tries to appeal to the chud stereotype by saying
>w-well if you like hot young women you're just like le jews!!
Like, at least try and shill better, you fucking tranny. Equating an age gap scenario to being a zionist gave me a genuine laugh tonight so kudos to you.
Anonymous No.24611904 >>24612505
>>24611842
>If a 40 year old woman dated a 16 year old boy it would rightfully be viewed as super creepy and probably predatory.

Would it now? As universally and emphatically as in a case where the man is the older party? Probably not.

>There is nothing a 40 year old has in common with a 16 year old

So what? A couple can be the same age but from different respective cultures, religions, social classes. There are all sorts of "gaps" that can exist between a man and a woman. "Having things in common" as a necessary criterion for having a relationship with someone is a gay, modern, arbitrary rule. Truth is you were catechized by pop music and magazines and tv. Sentimental pop culture dogmas. A body of dogmas according to which fornication, adultery, homosexuality and being a furry are ok or kinda naughty at worst, but a teen dating a middle-aged man? Oh no. Oh Lord. I feel literally sick rn.

>at that point the girl is essentially a pretty doll with a pulse that breathes that they like to fuck.

Nigga what.

>The side eyes are warranted.

Normies will side-eye what the system tells them to side-eye. Your 14-year-old daughter wants to undergo a sex change and worship Baphometh? The normies placidly blink. They see no problem. Just let the gurl do her thang yall. She wants to date an 18-year-old guy? The normies side-eye, fume, groan. Serious bundaries have been crossed. She is but a child!
Anonymous No.24611906 >>24611912
>>24611895
More coping. No appeals to Scripture or anything that’s been said, just more whimpering on historical precedent. This is so low on his priorities, but he’s dedicated two or three whole paragraphs on this. Have fun defending Hollywood elites dating pre-teens, I’m sure that’s a good use of your limited time on this earth.
Anonymous No.24611907 >>24611918
>>24611867
Nobody's talking about scripture nor do you need Christian theology to refute dumbfuck claims like
>he sends predictable Zionist tards such as these.
>zionists
Holy kek. For future reference, you're gonna have to be more subtle than that, redditfag.
Anonymous No.24611912 >>24611926
>>24611906
Where's the cope? Who's talking about scripture? Who talked about anything regarding preteen girls? Meds.
Anonymous No.24611914 >>24611926
>>24611863
You are extremely boring. Your arguments are crap. And now you're calling me satanic. Great shit all around, mate. Quality convo. Thank you.
Anonymous No.24611917 >>24611926
>>24611867
You absolute marvel of imbecility. Show me one Bible verse actually and explicitly condemning age gap relationships.
Anonymous No.24611918 >>24611945 >>24611951
>>24611907
>Ah! I’ve been found out!
A normal person would have just moved on by now, by the way. You’re a porn-brained dysgenic desperately seeking for validation from fellow degenerates. Keep chasing the dopamine!
Anonymous No.24611926 >>24611932 >>24611951
>>24611912
>>24611914
>>24611917
Samefagging. So much anger over a touched nerve. And again, they can’t contest a single verse I posted before. Just more waffling and stalling. So amusing!
Anonymous No.24611932 >>24611939
>>24611926
What exasperates me is how superlatively stupid and yet superlatively smug you are. Hence my tone. Show me ONE VERSE, faggot.
Anonymous No.24611939 >>24611947 >>24611951
>>24611932
I showed you several and you’re still in denial. You can explain to Him why you’re so adamant on bedding with preteens.
Anonymous No.24611945
>>24611918
>dysgenic

Ah, the Bible-thumping moralist is also an eugenicist. Another peculiar combination of traits. You should be studied.

I do love that part in the Gospels where Jesus is like "Verily I say unto thee that those who are low IQ and those who have shit genes shall not inherit the kingdom of heaven".
Anonymous No.24611947 >>24611971
>>24611939
None of the verses you referred to condemn age gaps in relationships.
Anonymous No.24611951 >>24611956
>>24611918
>>24611926
>>24611939
I've seen these same "type" of posts and can't quite put my finger on what they are. Same writing style and rhythm. It's womanish but not quite completely a roastie post. I can't tell if it's ESL trolling, a genuine redditor or just shilling.
Anonymous No.24611956 >>24611959 >>24611973
>>24611951
Keep coping. Only a degenerate would go to such lengths to defend this. Scripture tells you what your fate is. Plenty of “weeping and gnashing of teeth,” demonstrated in this thread.
Anonymous No.24611959 >>24611962 >>24611967
>>24611956
Yeah, you're probably just a troll. Fucking faggot. Thanks for wasting my time.
Anonymous No.24611962
>>24611959
Lmfao finally. I was waiting for some autist to dissect each of those verses but none of you fuckers would do it. Better luck next time.
Anonymous No.24611967
>>24611959
Burn, heathen!
Anonymous No.24611971 >>24611975
>>24611947
All of them do. If you get filtered by the Bible then that’s your fate. You’ll continue to sin out of ignorance.
Anonymous No.24611972
>>24608521
What's startling and possibly illegal are the anons not immediately recognising that this post was written by chatgpt.
Anonymous No.24611973
>>24611956
Jokes on me, I guess. I fell hard for the bait. Gg
Anonymous No.24611975 >>24611977 >>24611986
>>24611971
Here's one passage to which you alluded:

>7 I have caused thee to multiply as the bud of the field, and thou hast increased and waxen great, and thou art come to excellent ornaments: thy breasts are fashioned, and thine hair is grown, whereas thou wast naked and bare.

>8 Now when I passed by thee, and looked upon thee, behold, thy time was the time of love; and I spread my skirt over thee, and covered thy nakedness: yea, I sware unto thee, and entered into a covenant with thee, saith the Lord God, and thou becamest mine.

This actually supports MY argument lmao. You can't read. Debating you is like debating a wall. Are you a troll or just dumb? I shall never know. Fuck you.
Anonymous No.24611977
>>24611975
Those were specifically 18+ nakedness. You need to read the abridged version.
Anonymous No.24611986 >>24612002
>>24611975
You think that’s referring to a 17 year old? I’m glad there are glowies watching this thread.
Anonymous No.24612002 >>24612017
>>24611986
No, she's probably younger.
Anonymous No.24612017
>>24612002
Of course you’d like that to be the case.
Anonymous No.24612170
>>24611470
>You have a sad idea of masculinity
and you have poor pattern recognition
Anonymous No.24612505 >>24612784 >>24612806 >>24621225
>>24611895
>>24611904
There's no way you guys genuinely can't conceive of thinking an enormous age gap relationship is weird without it stemming from "feminist" or "normie" propaganda or whatever. Like a middle aged teacher at high school is dating a freshman and going to see her at the lockers between classes? Maybe with a broccoli haircut too? Because if you're going to be drawn to things most people grow out of in their teens, you might as well. To most people that's transparently strange and concerning but if you think it's endearing or something idk what to tell you
Anonymous No.24612784 >>24612818
>>24612505
I don't care. What people think is weird is 100% propaganda and nothing else. Relationships are too private for there to be any reason to feel concerned by what normies have been told is "weird".

You talk like a faggot retard, by the way.
Anonymous No.24612806 >>24612822
>>24612505
Why is it that it always devolves into strawman with you people? It's not that I can't conceive that people (read: mostly women) think it's weird nor does anyone claim it's endearing. I've seen enough s o y boys and roasties sperg at age gap relationships to know they get the ick. It's that I don't care about what they "feel" is icky. Saying something is icky or weird is not a compelling argument for why something is le bad, especially something like age gaps which have been around for literal centuries. Do I think most people would get grossed out over an 80 year old man with an 18 year old? Sure. But I'd get grossed out at old people having sex regardless. So that's not really an argument against age gaps necessarily.

You can toss this the other way around, too. Is it really hard for you to conceive that a girl who has already gone through puberty and become a biological adult not gonna be seen as attractive? It's funny. All these same faggots who are "appalled" at age gaps are the same ones gooning and drooling waiting for the clock to strike 12 when Billie Eillish turned 18 or get horny at artists like Sabrina Carpenter or any other young hot chick, like the one in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. At least be consistent. Either it's ALL wrong (i.e. "looking at a girl 4 years younger than you is problematic, sweaty") or you admit that men find beautiful adult women hot, no matter the age gap.
Anonymous No.24612818 >>24613098
>>24612784
You talk like a contrarian shutin with zero opinions untainted by spite. Way more of an NPC than your buzzword boogeymen
Anonymous No.24612822 >>24612828 >>24612831 >>24613158
>>24612806
You're another first world porn addict backreading your perversions into the past because you know that's exactly what they are. I live in an ethnostate. A teacher who molested one of his students here got his shit pushed in by her male relatives. The issue isn't your biological attraction to <18 year old girls. That's something I accept can't be helped for most. It's your identification with that attraction.
Anonymous No.24612828
>>24612822
>You're another first world porn addict backreading your perversions into the past because you know that's exactly what they are
Age gaps have always existed. Cope, seethe, dilate, etc.

>A teacher who molested one of his students here got his shit pushed in by her male relatives.
Based desu. Again, you're fighting with a strawman. I don't watch porn but you bring up a good point. Most of the redditfags that sperg over this are 100% porn addicts, which mostly feature young girls from like 20-28. So it is pretty ironic that they cape for this shit so hard.
Anonymous No.24612831 >>24612842
>>24612822
>That's something I accept can't be helped for most
Just one other thing. If it's such a "heckin weird awkward" perversion, why is it "most"? Doesn't a perversion imply it's abnormal?
Anonymous No.24612842 >>24613658
>>24612831
The identification is what's perverse, not the attraction, which is instinctive. There is a world of difference between happening to find youthful features attractive, and making cunny juice box gigachad edits.
Anonymous No.24613098
>>24612818
I am that and feel no shame over it, but I don't think that makes me very NPC. Those were your buzzwords, too, usually I'd just say "people"
Anonymous No.24613158
>>24612822

Appalachian mountains?
Anonymous No.24613658
>>24612842
>making cunny juice box gigachad edits
Kek nigger, stop trolling. You legit had me going.
Anonymous No.24613924
>>24611842
>If a 40 year old woman dated a 16 year old boy it would rightfully be viewed as super creepy and probably predatory.
If it can kill you, it can consent. What 16 year old boy couldn't murder a 40 year old woman with his bare hands, exactly?
>muh social power
Fake bullshit.
Anonymous No.24614154
It is an effective evolutionary strategy for the young women at the peak of reproductive health to want to choose to mate with successful mature men, who by their success, have proved their genetic qualities. If they mate with men of a similar age to themselves, they have no idea of their partner's long term behaviours and success.
Anonymous No.24614460 >>24614493
>>24608521
>Nobody fucked with Cormac. He just gave off an aura that he was not to be fucked with.
I refuse to believe that people were deferential to an upper class yankee who spent years using a fake name while larping as a deadbeat cowboy.
Anonymous No.24614493 >>24614500
>>24614460
>spent years using a fake name
?
Anonymous No.24614500
>>24614493
Are zoomers incapable of using a search engine?
Anonymous No.24615377
Real Men Date Hags
Anonymous No.24615385
>>24611842
not at all. kid gets his rocks off. You're probably a woman or gay and thus constitutionally incapable of picturing the very real difference between men and women. keep reading. Maybe you'll find it.
Anonymous No.24616474 >>24617073
bloody nonce convention in here
Anonymous No.24616488 >>24616505
>>24611842
>If a 40 year old woman dated a 16 year old boy it would rightfully be viewed as super creepy and probably predatory.
No it wouldn't lmao.
Anonymous No.24616505 >>24616511 >>24618366
>>24616488
brown hands typed this post
Anonymous No.24616511
>>24616505
It's a basic societal fact. Nobody gives a fuck about older woman/boy relations, in fact it's celebrated as a steal on the boys part more often than not. It's one of the many hypocrisies of American prudishness.
Anonymous No.24617073 >>24617516
>>24616474
go get fucked in the ass
Anonymous No.24617516
>>24617073
easy tiger
Anonymous No.24617919 >>24618773
>>24611470
How come they go after McCarthy and not Woody Allen?
McCarthy is a masculine Anglo, and Woody Allen is a beta Jew.
Anonymous No.24618366
>>24616505
Nta but I would've done ANYTHING for a hot milf teacher to give it to me sloppy
Anonymous No.24618755
>>24611842
Anonymous No.24618773 >>24620153
>>24617919
>Jew going after young girl
>How pathetic!
>Anglo going after young girl
>Wowzers! How based! The roasties won't like this!
Incels need to leave my board. Shoo.
Anonymous No.24618787 >>24618792
Man he was packin'.
Anonymous No.24618792
>>24618787
he is like me. he loves the third world for the same reason — he is no longer a short man. just a man.
Anonymous No.24619058 >>24620084 >>24620161
somewhat out of context post
>>24608494
he sent her this letter as his way of asking her not to tell anyone about their relationship (which she of course did the minute he died)
Anonymous No.24619065 >>24621017 >>24622257
>>24608521
based Mac
Anonymous No.24620084
>>24619058
he encouraged her to tell her story, and she was very fair to him
Anonymous No.24620153 >>24621011
>>24618773
faggot.
Anonymous No.24620161
>>24619058
>this letter
where the letter?
Anonymous No.24621011
>>24620153
we don't sign our posts here, newfriend
Anonymous No.24621017
>>24619065
this made my day (worse)
Anonymous No.24621225 >>24621270
>>24612505
Age gap relationships were rarely side-eyed through human history unless the girl was a literal child.

People getting their panties in a twist over it is a modern phenomenon, and that’s why it likely won’t last.
Anonymous No.24621261 >>24621281
>>24608521
>I loved him. He was my safety.
geezers really have a field day with bitches from broken homes.
Anonymous No.24621270
>>24621225
True. This is why bloodsports will also make a return.
Anonymous No.24621281 >>24621285 >>24622291
>>24621261
Jews and slimeballs hate this because it undercuts their supply of porn performers and ritual sacrifices
Anonymous No.24621285 >>24621305
>>24621281
>the jews who profit from barely legal teen porn don't want me to fuck barely legal teens
what honestly is the endgame for retards like you?
Anonymous No.24621305
>>24621285
>porn conduces to sex
what honestly is the endgame for retards like you?
Anonymous No.24622151 >>24628475
beware virgins.. porn will hold your hand and walk you down the aisle and deliver you unto the moist embrace of Sex
Anonymous No.24622257
>>24619065

Most men cannot dare to love, let alone get an award for it.
Anonymous No.24622291 >>24622298 >>24622327
>>24621281
>slimeballs hate vulnerable abused girls 'falling in love' with them
...right
Anonymous No.24622298 >>24622322
>>24622291
never said or implied, impartial third party btw
Anonymous No.24622322 >>24622323
>>24622298
He's contrasting the scenarios even though one is a meaningful alternative to the other even though they're the same thing -- a broken girl is being taken advantage of. Don't butt in if you're gonna be a retard
Anonymous No.24622323
>>24622322
as though not even though
Anonymous No.24622327
>>24622291
Not slimeballs but genuine saviors if it happens once and they make good on it (McCarthy tried to, twice IIRC)
Anonymous No.24623282
*wipes chin*
Anonymous No.24623782
>>24608521
Shut up, fag. No on cares.
Anonymous No.24623856 >>24624990 >>24633942
>>24608483 (OP)
Seeing this reminds me of the whole Lil Tay OnlyFans thing that's been going on. You see the people in the comments kvetch about
>NOOO YOU GOTTA CHECK THEIR HECKIN HARD DRIVES!!!
>LE PEDOS!!! SHE'S A BIOLOGICAL WOMAN BUT LE NUMBER IS ICKY!!
Some of these comments are from other 20yo OF girls, btw. And yet, nobody calls out the disgusting, degenerate, filthy porn industry itself. As if they weren't already pimping that dumb girl out before she got into porn. People are so fucking retarded, I can't even bother to care anymore. Normies really deserve everything that's coming to them.
Anonymous No.24624791
>>24608521
>The image is startling
Anonymous No.24624990 >>24625129 >>24625238
>>24623856
>Some of these comments are from other 20yo OF girls, btw. And yet, nobody calls out the disgusting, degenerate, filthy porn industry itself.
Because it's empowering to women, apparently.
Anonymous No.24625129
>>24624990
That's what I'm getting at. On one hand:
>porn is heckin empowering chud!
And then on the other:
>until a legally adult woman actually uses it to her advantage because... it just isn't, okay?!
They praise the rules and the game and then kvetch when a young girl reaps all the advantages of it because... reasons.
Anonymous No.24625238
>>24624990
Porn is empowering when women are making money.

just like

Selling drugs is empowering when the man wants to keep you poor.
Anonymous No.24625258 >>24625273
>>24608489
Out of 10!
Anonymous No.24625273
>>24625258
>Deer in the headlights moment.
Anonymous No.24625640 >>24626884
>>24611296
You’re a legitimate subhuman
Anonymous No.24625702 >>24625706
>>24611842
>If a 40 year old woman dated a 16 year old boy
Is she hot?
Anonymous No.24625706
>>24625702
40 year old hags are built for 16 year old shounen
Anonymous No.24626884
>>24625640
delete yourself
Anonymous No.24628475
>>24622151
NOT TRUE!!
Anonymous No.24628500
>>24611842
>If a 40 year old woman dated a 16 year old boy it would rightfully be viewed as super creepy and probably predatory
This is the situation with the President and First Lady of France, except he was 14. No one cares.
>There is nothing a 40 year old has in common with a 16 year old
What exactly do they need to have in common besides love for each other?
Anonymous No.24628505 >>24631439
>>24611842
You are homosexual and, unlike the way things have been going up until recently, that's not gonna be tolerated in the near future.
Anonymous No.24629745
>>24611842
I would've loved a thick-as-oatmeal 40 year old mommy to sit on my face at 16. I probably would've died of arousal, though
Anonymous No.24629984
>>24611867
The Epstein/Maxwell case was different because they were human traffickers, luring in young girls under the guise of being models, working as masseuses, attendants, etc,, then prostituting them.
It was a way crueler affair. McCarthy’s case seems to be consensual and even uplifting for the two of them.
Epstein even talked about “buying a sex slave from Yugoslavia”, “this is my teenage sex slave” to some acquaintances according to accounts, hence also being in on the Balkan/Eastern European sex slave trafficking as a source where he got some of the girls, for instance. It was way darker than this.
Anonymous No.24631439
>>24628505
lmfao
Anonymous No.24633191 >>24633221
>>24608483 (OP)
>See the child. Fuck it.
Anonymous No.24633221
>>24633191
Kek
Anonymous No.24633942
>>24623856
>women being retarded and gatekeeping porn from the new young hot generation
Color me surprised
Anonymous No.24634667
>>24608521
>possibly illegal.
grok, what is the AOC in Mexico?
Anonymous No.24636260
honestly every anti Cormac Anon in this thread doesn't have the manna, the essence, full sack needed to disarm a gun toting virgin and be her safety in every jungle and beach of Mexico.