← Home ← Back to /lit/

Thread 24611293

8 posts 2 images /lit/
Anonymous No.24611293 >>24611314 >>24611443 >>24611453 >>24611562
Do authors create great stories, or do they discover great stories which have always existed or at least necessarily will exist given a cultures norms/morals/assumptions?
Anonymous No.24611298 >>24612276
Both. Next question.
Anonymous No.24611314
>>24611293 (OP)
The latter sounds like Calvinism for authorship.
Anonymous No.24611443
>>24611293 (OP)
Joseph and His Brothers by Thomas Mann decisively answers this question. It's the latter.
Anonymous No.24611453
>>24611293 (OP)
Would like to find some literary analysis on this in lecture form
Anonymous No.24611562 >>24611603
>>24611293 (OP)

It's the latter. All the stories were already written by different people, some tropes might replicate each other, but the reason why people read books is for the enjoyment of the prose and the writing style.

Literature always was built around BTFOing plotf*gs, even children's books. Children like books made for them because the story is beautiful and it doesn't matter what would be in the end.
Anonymous No.24611603
>>24611562
I think there’s a moment in every young reader’s life where they’re reading some book and it just seems stale. The plot goes on, the characters talk, things happen, but you get sick of that whole routine. There’s nothing interesting, all the drama is superficial, all the events seem inane. You almost start digging into the text as an unconscious habit, looking for typos or strange turns of phrase, SOMETHING to break out of that monotony of plot plot plot. A lot of these genrefic writers read nothing but genre fiction, so they all start to sound the same. Same descriptions, characters talk the same, everything the same. You need to eventually “graduate” to real literature if you’re above a certain level of intelligence. Obviously literary genrefic exists (and sometimes it even exceeds a lot of “classics” that just plain stink) but I think the transition toward higher lit is inevitable for smart people.
Anonymous No.24612276
>>24611298
What a shit question