Thread 24615950

Bros I spilled the spaghetti. I was telling few acquaintances about Stirner here is how conservation went:

>"so there's this absolute egoist German philosopher Stirner who was a moral nihilist and said that we should only act selfishly and whatever favors us is valid."
>"hmm, that sounds interesting, I'll give him a read"
>"btw that means if you could get away with RAPE then you should do it
Then there was long silence in the car after this.

Holy fucking shit I am retarded. I am never to going to discuss philosophy ever again in real life.

>>24615950 (OP)
he poopoo peepee'd his Stirner all over his interlocutor, "oooAHHhhAAAAUUUUHH" he went as he came.
Silence arrived, confusion arose, "mee poopoo peepee you? whaaa? ooeeeeoeoeee peeee poopoo"
post on 4chinz I will

Most sane Stirnerite on this planet.

>>24615950 (OP)
That assertion isn't even compatible with Stirner, there are lots of people (probably most people) who absolutely wouldn't rape anyone in any context because it would destroy their own self-image. If they were to do it just because they think they "should", they would be giving themselves up to a spook all the same as in any other situation where a person is moved by ideological abstraction as opposed to their own true desire. The ghost of Stirner whispering in your ear about what you should or shouldn't do is just as much a spook as a priest doing the same thing.

>>24616158
This. You should just, do-do, and thus, this: >>24615972

>>24616158
No I understand it completely. There is no "should" in Stirner. But I am verbally autistic.

>>24615972
fpbp

>>24615972
Only true Stirnerite post on this thread

>>24615950 (OP)
You should have just said "of course I would never rape any of you haha"