>>24629995 (OP)
women like that don't get jobs "coding", they get those fake instagram jobs where they send emails for ten minutes then spend all day drinking lattes and shit, I believe the term people are using for it is "jew daycare"
>>24629999 >quads
Checked >fake instagram jobs where they send emails for ten minutes then spend all day drinking lattes DA JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS
They'd probably get in trouble for filming internal company communications or client negotiations so they can only film themselves typing and going on break. You didn't think that the 48 second edited TikTok video you saw on Twitter encompassed everything they do at work, did you?
>>24630063
This. For all the shitting on humanities degrees that anons here and there like to do, the primary difference anymore is that they‘re at least fun and will allow you to meet girls.
>>24629995 (OP)
There’s plenty of jobs for Computer science. Just not Gucci overpaid ones anymore. Most will start around 70k which is solid money if you’re not a retard with money, like most.
>>24630190 >There’s plenty of jobs for Computer science
There's a fixed quantity of legacy code to be maintained. I can come up with software I want but I can't afford to develop it and none of it's commercially viable.
there are few coding jobs right now because interest rates have been sky high for too long. it's well known that the job market for new grads and career switching is horrible right now and has been for quite a while. the nyt are so fucking lame. it's hilarious that this reporter's evidence for jobs being lost to ai is a bunch of billboards for some shitty ai startup in san francisco? wow any asshole with capital can buy a bunch of bill boards. chatgpt 5 sucked so bad people demanded they bring back 4o. ai has peaked and it still sucks!
hmmm so i wonder what was going on with interest rates in 2022 and since? while only one article mentions ai, neither article mentions interest rates. the paper of record, folks.
>>24629995 (OP) >actual smart people pave the way, create industry >unthinking bottom of the barrel hordes flock to degree thinking they'll have it easy >now saturated with millions of idiots who actually thought they were doing something
Keep posting those grindset memes tho lol
>>24630975
if u read the article she's actually an influencer who ended up taking a job in enterprise sales or whatever, more dopey reporting from the nyt
>>24629995 (OP)
The job market is hopelessly cooked. Zoomers like her need to focus on becoming more attractive so they can marry a financially stable man and start having his children. No concerns about job interviews/applications, office politics, or job loss from A.I./jeets as a wife and mother.
>>24632278
I find girls on women's forums always wonder why women would have kids if the job market sucks. Everyone conservative whines about the falling population but they also admit there are limited jobs
>>24630770 >ai has peaked and it still sucks!
Yeah, that's why Elon Musk and Zuck and Bezos are spending billions of dollars on data centers and GPU's
You know more than they do!
>>24633003
zuck who blew billions on the metaverse? musk who overpaid for twitter and whose other biz depended on government spending? bezos who retired and is no longer ceo of amazon?
>>24633287
i wish ai was good, but i've used all these models for coding and they're all mid at best. mostly they just waste your time with piles of bloated shitty code.