Thread 24638905

>>24638905 (OP)
All beauty comes from impulse. There is no such thing as a neutral observer.

Truly dont understand why Schopenhaeur randomly just says dumb shit like this. Its just so shallow and basis. Doesnt even bother to try and pretend to be logical or justify anything

>>24638905 (OP)
Based. Even women know this implicitly, it's why basically all famous fashion designers are men

>>24638905 (OP)
>>24638932
wasn't this a quote by Aristotle?

>>24638938
Same criticism can apply to Aristotle but arguably even worse, sometimes he just says shit with the implicit assumption that its just obvious or a given

>>24638950
It is obvious and given, you're just an imbecile

>>24638938
aristotle's claim is that woman is a deformed version of man

>>24638905 (OP)
He is completely correct. Women were clearly built solely for the continuation of the race. Men are the real, superior aesthetic sex.

>>24638932
You honestly sound like you've never seen a woman in your entire life.

>>24638958
>Men are the real, superior aesthetic sex.
the average woman has a substantially better understanding of aesthetics than most men, and men who have a good grasp of aesthetics are usually bisexual

>>24638961
>the average woman has a substantially better understanding of aesthetics than most men
Again, perhaps you should try a quick google search of "woman." I'm not entirely sure that you have looked at any of them before.

>>24638905 (OP)
Maybe it’s because we’re daily beaten and raped, incel.

He's right. Only the Male form is Aesthetic. Without the impulse of sexual drive a woman is boring to look at

>>24638977
what's with you BAP tards and every one of your posts feeling like a desperate urge to repress your shadow

>>24638981
what's with you jews and your desperate psychologizing and bald-faced lying

>>24638970
I can't talk to a woman without the cops getting involved. Thanks, feminism. Have fun with your plummeting birthrates.

>>24638987
>you're just w-wrong!!!!!! waaaaaahhh

>>24638977
This is just pure cope, you just mindlessly copy what Schope said. What is this even supposed mean.

>>24638991
>muh feminism

it's a two way street. men today aren't exactly trying to bring back Victorian values.

>>24638997
It's not. Some retards complain that philosophers are just playing word games well schoppy here is just stating a simple fact known by the ancients and anyone else who isn't a foid.

>>24638996
I enjoy your seethe

>>24638905 (OP)
This is just genuinely a retarded, neurotic take. There is no aesthetic basis to measure the sexes against each other, as you can only determine woman’s beauty with what you see of them and vice versa. Essentially apples and oranges.

If you aren’t “clouded” by your sexual impulse, you’re detached of a part of your humanity. You are entitled to being in awe of a woman’s beauty, ideally one you love. You’d sit there and think of the divine patrician design that sculpted them. You’re a faggot or sexless if you don’t realise this is THE normal way to perceive the ideal woman.

We are built to love them, and there’s not much better than getting loved back by them.

Im an unlovable, unridable, stone cold incel freak fuck btw

>>24639024
>Im an unlovable, unridable, stone cold incel freak fuck btw
No wonder. Explains everything. Embodies the shallow internal contradiction of incels.
I disagree with everything Schopenhauer said. But that doesnt mean I glorify impulse and women like you do.

Retard. Even if human beings are "by nature" without real determination. Giving way to automaton behaviour. And having no self awareness is reprehensible.

>>24639084
The incel bit was a joke. I think you may be new here. I can coach you…

“…doesn’t mean I glorify impulse and woman…”
What do you glorify then? Science? Any art that is certifiably devoid of all femininity and sex? Dogs? I’m thinking it’s dogs if anything. You do not have good taste. Closer to a golem than a man. I’m sorry you have these weird psychosexual issues.

What the fuck do you mean “if human beings a ‘by nature’”? What else could they be if not natural and divine in origin?

Also your definition of self awareness is deciding you don’t find women beautiful lamo stfu you retarded faggot

>>24638991
lmao what a loser

>>24638932
They were in the romantic period so individual opinion seemed heroic and beautiful

>>24639153
as it damn well should.

The human body is a mockery, regardless of sex. Absurd results of evolutionary causal necessity. Tentacled vehicles for torture. To see any beauty in this monstrosity is such vain pitiful foolishness. Almost everything in this world is an affront to God, if there is one. We are monsters. Don't you see? We are in hell. Wake up. Don't you see?