>>24653124 (OP)
what is this book about really? if its about the illusion of reason, that is, the trap that every midwit falls for, which is how reason can only take you so far and trying to base every decision on it is foolish, then im not interested because i already learned this before i even started reading
>>24653124 (OP)
i could spend weeks reading this and thinking about it and remember 5% of it in the long run. I can have Grok (in a matter of seconds) summarize it succinctly in a couple paragraphs and read it while taking a shit and remember the exact same information. Get with the times.
>>24653187
Take acid and be permanently brain damaged in a plane of existence where selflessness and collaboration is integral. You may as well make a tik tok
>>24653124 (OP)
it is actually not that difficult to understand the core of it... I doubt anyone in this world understands every single facet or aspect of it though...
>>24653151 >le 7+5=12
Both 7 and 5 define 12 independently. 7 = 1+1+1+1+1+1+1 (this includes both the definition of 1 and of +. 12 = 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1.
K*nt is a hack that presupposes algebra, then pretends like he's just created something out of thin air.
>>24654870
It quite literally is, definitionally. The entire purpose of mathematics in any field in which it is secondary (meaning outside of pure mathematics) is analytics. The body of algebra is defined within a few key terms (to include computation signs, 0 and 1, etc). When your clause includes a 5 and a +, you've already defined every number in existence. K*nt is a fucking retard.
>>24653201
I love alliteration! Pink purple pussies pack powerful punches! Angry aunts aggrandize after arugula and almonds! Great garish grandads grunt greedily! Fat fuckers fear five flights!
>>24653124 (OP)
I have and do. Also I just learned calculus recently and am amazed by how much Kant was influenced by it; the theoretical side of limits is applied directly to Newtonian physics to finally exorcise final causation.
Ask me to explain something. I can only be brief as phoneposting.
>>24654841
Jokes aside, what would i miss if i read a detailed, chapter by chapter, summary of a non-fictiok book like critique of pure reason? Any reason to read the entire thing? Im serious, no bait.
>>24657520
you lazy faggot just suck... read the whole damn thing... think about a girlfriend that is only putting half of your cock down her throat because it makes you cum anyways... instead of doing the whole thang