← Home ← Back to /lit/

Thread 24654686

40 posts 12 images /lit/
Anonymous No.24654686 >>24654702 >>24654856 >>24654883 >>24654897 >>24656776 >>24656839 >>24656944 >>24656970 >>24657606 >>24659091 >>24659111
Most modern literature is just porn
is this true? is most of the romance novels (the only genre of literature booming) just porn, but aimed at women?
Anonymous No.24654702
>>24654686 (OP)
>literature being women's fantasy
It has been the case since the medieval times
Anonymous No.24654714
Literature to address the fact that I know I‘m observing attention seeker behavior but can‘t stop my heart or my penis anyway?

Picrel: underwhelming
Anonymous No.24654814
/ourgirl/
they're eating her up in the comments for basing her feelings in sex-negative puritan shame unfortunately
Anonymous No.24654856 >>24655000 >>24655469
>>24654686 (OP)
Based video. Considering how many VTubers are openly into degenerate shit like BL and are also Shotacons it was pretty obvious that it rots femoid brains.
Stopped watching her after she used Attack on Titan as an example of well written morality. She's hot enough I'll probably overlook that at some point.
Anonymous No.24654864
>The Subtle Horror of Vampire Erotica
Anonymous No.24654872 >>24654943
why did you change her channel name to femoid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffvRhsViyIQ
Anonymous No.24654883 >>24654891 >>24654924
>>24654686 (OP)
How does she know modern literature is pornslop and bad? That means she must have read some. Why did she read modern literature? Because she likes it but wants to appear smart? Or because she set out to find what she was looking for? Either way, I hate women and I could have told you modern literature was crap before ever opening a single front cover.
Anonymous No.24654891
>>24654883
>heads I win, tails you lose
stfu faggot
Anonymous No.24654897
>>24654686 (OP)
Jumping Jehosaphat imagine being on the receiving end of a cfnm handjob from her
Anonymous No.24654924
>>24654883
based
Anonymous No.24654943
>>24654872
so that you cannot give her views, you cannot know this eceleb's name and you cannot give her any engagement unless you specifically search the title of the video
Anonymous No.24655000 >>24655096
>>24654856
>Stopped watching her after she used Attack on Titan as an example of well written morality
unironically, what's wrong with it?
Anonymous No.24655096
>>24655000
Out side of Attack on Titan generally just being poorly written? The specific example she used was them not killing Erin for being able to turn into a titan as an example of morality when morality wasn't even a factor in that situation. Erin being potentially more dangerous than he is useful is more of a practical concern because it would obviously be moral to kill him if he did start eating people.
Anonymous No.24655469 >>24655529 >>24659115
>>24654856
>Grown-ass woman using a FOTM trannime as an example of good writing
Grim
Anonymous No.24655529 >>24655730 >>24657003
>>24655469
anon that anime is almost 7 years old
Anonymous No.24655730
>>24655529
>implying it wasn't a FOTM series when it came out and became big with normies
Anonymous No.24656776
>>24654686 (OP)
>most
Not sure about that, but romantasy seems to to be written porn (or erotica) for women, yes.
Anonymous No.24656839
>>24654686 (OP)
Judging from the channel name she’s just regurgitating 4chan points to a Youtube audience so she’ll get free views and money (wishlist, donation as the simp horde grows).
There are some dozen of them in this particular “genre” right now. You’re so smart anon. You figured it all out. Like and subscribe for more on what a good boy you are. Buy the merch.
Anonymous No.24656847 >>24656959
She's not being forced to read such books. If people want to read degeneracy, then whatever.
Anonymous No.24656944
>>24654686 (OP)
I rememeber I saw a lot of femcel gooner rage in the comments of that video
Anonymous No.24656959 >>24656961
>>24656847
Her main point on her channel seems to be that modern literature in general is corporate controlled dogshit, she made a good video about modern fantasy along these lines.
Her points are based but she needs to stop sipping her fucking coffee doing the tryhard "comfy" shit which makes it unwatchable to me.
Anonymous No.24656961
>>24656959
If the razor-thin aesthetic bullshit draws a larger audience's attention to their rotting souls, I'm all for it. That said, I can't stand it, either.
Anonymous No.24656970 >>24656976 >>24656996 >>24657012 >>24657414
>>24654686 (OP)
Women enjoying erotic literature might be the least harmful expression of sexuality in the modern era. I cannot see any good reason for this topic to have countless threads devoted to it.
Anonymous No.24656976 >>24656984
>>24656970
The problem is that it has taken over the entire field of literature, and it being written like a checklist of tropes and cliches without any complexity or depth whatsoever leads new readers assuming that's just how shallow literature is. Have you tried reading any of it? It's insipid.
Anonymous No.24656984
>>24656976
I don't think it's taken over literature to the same degree as fantasy or sci-fi. Even still there's space for actual writers like Houellebecq or Ligotti. Let's be honest, it's just because the readership of erotic literature is overwhelmingly female that it's a problem here.
Anonymous No.24656996
>>24656970
It's very problematic and the objectifying female gaze is both disgusting and sexist against men. Femcel goonslop is basically killing men as well as kittens.
Anonymous No.24657003
>>24655529
>anon that anime is almost 7 years old
isnt it much older than that, i think i streamed a few episodes on netflix in 2014
Anonymous No.24657012
>>24656970
>Women enjoying erotic literature might be the least harmful expression of sexuality in the modern era.
Did it increase or reduce bight rate for western/white women?
Anonymous No.24657364 >>24658874
I am going to masturbate to her tonight
Anonymous No.24657414
>>24656970
>erotic literature

>BDSM
>Sexual abuse and torture of minors
>Fucked up fetishes that you hitherto encountered in gay lit
>A total reversal of the feminist ideology where the female protagonist is a series of holes for a violent abusive man
>Simple language bereft of nuance

Erotic implies some kind of skill with language and sensuality of description. Lolita and Ada, despite their subject matter, actually do have scenes that are erotic due to the way they're written.
There's a word for the female trend: pornographic, These books are crass, vulgar, banal, with sex acts reduced to impersonal mechanics coated with profanities and the acts presented described in the most unaesthetic language available and the general sensual atmosphere lacking: a literature suitable for the cheapest brothel in New Delhi. The only value of this literature is psychoanalytic.
If this "romantic" crap were actually erotic, its existence wouldn't have been such an affront to literature.
Anonymous No.24657606 >>24657621 >>24659053
>>24654686 (OP)
is this all /lit/ is now? bitching about romance novels? i’ve seen like 80 of these threads in the past few months.
Anonymous No.24657621
>>24657606
>80 of these threads
Learn to take a hint retard.
Anonymous No.24658874
>>24657364
This thoughbeit.
Anonymous No.24659053 >>24659086
>>24657606
Consider Hollywood. Think of all the films that came out this year, 2025.
>Tornado
>Superman
>The Monkey
>Mickey 17
>Death of a Unicorn
>Final Destination
>Mission Impossible
>F1
>28 Years Later
>Leelo and Stitch
>etc, etc.

Now I didnt list all these movies because they were good, most of them are not really good, but there is a variety among them. Action, horror, scifi, superhero, comedy, etc. Now imagine none of these movies got made. Imagine that Hollywood said, "you know what? This year we're only making gooner films for women like 50 Shades and Twilight and Babygirl. That's it. Nothing for men." And then imagine Hollywood actually did that. And month after month it was just films of plain Jane getting railed by werewolves and murderers and millionaires and age gaps (where the women is way older, not the other kind of age gap [ew!!]) and abusive exes. Zero variety in genre. Studios refuse to make anything else. Movie theaters are flooded with bad boy harems. All your female coworkers are watching softcore pornography in the breakroom on their phone, right in front of you.

That's the current state of literature. And just to be clear, there's nothing wrong with porn, but when it becomes so ubiquitous that nothing else gets made... you'll hear from readers who arent into that shit.
Anonymous No.24659086
>>24659053
And, as stated before, they don't understand that this isn't high art, and they delude themselves into thinking that it's the most sublime exploration of the human condition, and you can't convince them otherwise, since they've never read anything else.
Anonymous No.24659091 >>24659114
>>24654686 (OP)
Don't know.
The main fiction I read nowadays is fantasy slop targeting men, a bit of horror when the mood strikes me, and classics that have stood the test of time.

I generally avoid romance because most of it in literature makes me roll my eyes or makes me cringe.
I can tolerate it in movies or as a subplot in manga, but when romance is the focus or is in literatary form it just isn't for me.
Anonymous No.24659111
>>24654686 (OP)
>is it true that most modern literature is just porn
No. This is not close to true unless you think "includes a sex scene or implies a sex scene" makes a book pornographic.
>Is
Are.
>Are most of the romance novels (the only genre of literature booming)
The only booming genre of literature, or the only genre of literature that's booming. "Literature booming" sounds like a phrasal noun.
>Are most of the romance novels (the only genre of literature that's booming) just porn, but aimed at women?
Probably not, but a significant fraction of contemporary romance novels could be described this way. I'd guess it's at least 20%. Maybe they comprise 1/4th of all contemporary romance novels? But I'm really not sure.
Anonymous No.24659114
>>24659091
>The main fiction I read nowadays is fantasy slop
>literatary
incredible
Anonymous No.24659115
>>24655469
>trannime
>ctrl-f "trans," "tranny," "trannies"
>0 results
Obsessed