Thread 24658599

Eternal reminder to read it. Front to back ideally.

>>24658599 (OP)
But Im not done with the greeks yet

>>24658606
Honestly you'll appreciate them more after Kant

>>24658599 (OP)
Is it true that I need to read prolegomena to any future metaphysics first?

>>24658621
no

That the Prolegomena is meant to be read before the critique of pure reason is a meme literally refuted in the intro to the prolegomena:

>although a mere sketch PRECEDING the Critique of Pure Reason would be UNINTELLIGIBLE, UNRELIABLE, and USELESS, it is all the more useful as a SEQUEL. For so we are able to grasp the whole, to examine in detail the chief points of importance in the science, and to improve in many respects our exposition, as compared with the first execution of the work.

>>24658599 (OP)
Reminder to read Kant's earlier works before the three critiques.

-Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770
-Lectures on Logic
-Lectures on Metaphysics
-Lectures on Ethics
-Anthropology, History, and Education

>>24658599 (OP)
Nobody has ever read this from front to back.

>>24658859
I literally did—twice.

Is this some come of meme?
I started reading the PDF and then ordered the book.
I read Fanged Noumena and Kant is referenced multiple times and then I started seeing his name appear more, then I came here and started seeing it posted every day.
What’s the deal?

>>24659171
Baader-Meinhof phenomenon, or maybe it's a sign you need to read it.

>>24658599 (OP)
Reminder to learn German and read it in the original.

>>24659171
Bro weren't you here during the esoteric kantianism era?

>>24659171
S Y N C H R O N I C I T I D D I E S

>>24659183
I’m reading it. Still on the introduction though.
>>24659189
No I got here like a day or two ago.
>>24659194
Yeah

>>24659209
Kant's been shilled on here for YEARS