Thread 24666057

Unprotected anal sex with 1000's of partners.

Beyond the hopeless attempt as replicating the natural act of intercourse, sodomy has one primary, and largely unconscious aim: the erosion, and later the total eradication, of the body's foundation: the root chakra.

Like a ship's captain destroying their anchor house, this renders the entire bodily vessel adrift; a complete victim of the winds and currents of the world. Yet with this distance from the ground, the artistic and creative forces are allowed greater access into the sodomite. It is a great price, for a great reward.

>>24666057 (OP)
give us three sentences on a book of his you've read

The Butcher of Tunisia they're saying.

>>24666057 (OP)
Gay men will fuck anything with a penis. No standards whatsoever.

>>24666091
Lol

>>24666099
Not really, there are LOTS of gay size queens who will only bend over for you if you have a dick that can reach into their stomach. There are actually more gay size queens than female size queens, don't ask how I know

>>24666091
i think you owe it to yourself to read books instead of memes

>>24666154
I think you owe it to yourself to stop spending your evenings getting used as a cum dumpster in public toilets by strangers you advertise yourself to on grindr.

>>24666118
Fucking kek.

>>24666057 (OP)
What motivates you to create this thread?

Repressed sexual feelings? Or do you just feel more masculine criticizing gays? How does it compensate for other aspects of your personality.

You have nothing intelligent to say about Focault, so at least tell us something about yourself. C’mon this is an anonymous forum - open yourself up.

>>24666099
Not true at all. Twinks have woman-tier standards.

>>24666239
Yeah, you're right. I don't know why I made this thread. I suppose just to try stave off the Sunday scaries. Here's a confession. Maybe it'll help me to just say it. When I was 11, I was out in the woods in central England. My two older cousins were there. We were singing a sea-shanty that my uncle had taught us. Half way through, I don't know what happened. They pushed me down, pulled down my pants, and put a stick in my asshole. I was crying. I didn't know what was happening, but I knew it was bad. Then they made me keep singing, and close my eyes. And the stick was still in my ass. I still see them from time to time. They've never brought it up. They probably hoped I'd forgotten. But to this day I hate the woods.

>>24666242
dude i was browsing sniffies and i saw the seemingly innocuous gay restaurant and club downtown apparently has a "backroom" with a "smoke machine" for anonymous group encounters? also i got hit on by gay dudes all the time probably 3 to 1 gay to chick ratio of people giving me their numbers or whatever. of course i never call any of them because i have no social skills.

>>24666057 (OP)
Including Algerian boys aged 8-10.

He is the most assigned figure in all of Academia BTW, assigned 43% more often than the next closest, Shakespeare. He is about 13,000% more likely to appear on a modern than syllabus Thomas Aquinas. Key ancient thinkers such as Cicero, Epicetus, or Plotinus are essentially non-existent by contrast. He is assigned 26,000% less often than Virgil, the most read author of the Canon for most of history, and Boethius, the most copied author of the Middle Ages, has half the showing of Virgil.

>>24666239
>What motivates you to create this thread?
It boils down to the fact that all his poststructuralism and theorizing seems like an apologetics for homosexuality. As if the historical persecution and condemnation of sodomy was just a way for power structures to create marginalised people (and later groups) to create a norm for people to conform to. People's perception is so saturated by media these days that they actually believe that homosexuals were loathed and feared because of social constructs without basis in nature. Their lifestyles are a perversion of nature>>24666118

>>24666273
I grew up in the outskirts of Constantine. Michel would come to our house from time to time to use my brother Amir. He had a big, swinging thing between his legs. I remember that image all to clearly. It even had a name: he referred to it as his "pendulum".

>>24666273
>Virgil, the most read author of the Canon for most of history
another gay pedo. wtf is wrong with the canon

>>24666288
kekk

>>24666273
Race theorist bell hooks (uncapitalized) is also almost on par with Aristotle (and twice Homer, or six times Virgil) while figures like Adorno vastly outstrip Augustine.

But it's not all post-modern. Sam Harris, Stephen Pinker, and Richard Dawkins also mog Augustine, Boethius, or Aquinas (and Homer)

The call for diversity has not resulted in figures like Avicenna, Averoese, Al Farabi, Laozi, Shankara, Nagarjuna, etc. being widely assigned. The Islamics and Hindus in particular are barely read. And while there is a robust space of Buddhist retreats and academies, and some other Eastern ones, no contemplative spaces for Western thought and praxis exist outside Christian ones (almost wholly Catholic and Orthodox).

The Western tradition is dead in the West. The key liberals all outstrip Aristotle, and even Rawls has pulled close. But anyone outside of Plato and Aristotle (often reread as ironic or empiricist) from the tradition before Descartes simply isn't read.

>>24666280
I’m gay and a lot of gays don’t live the life you imagine. You take an extreme example of one person in SF being used as the norm - it’s not.

Second the entire historical isolation comes about because people like you reject, isolate, ostracize, and hate gays. For the majority of human history we’ve been rejected and excluded by people like you and then you wonder why they write about loneliness? Look in the mirror.

You need to separate the author and his work. I don’t read Cormac McCarthy and say oh look here this is an attempt for society to make underage heterosexual relationships acceptable because he was banging some underage girl in Mexico.

Honestly I think people like you are upset because you believe in a God created ordered world. And now schools and other power structures force you to confront different views that show how wrong an ordered God centric reality really is. And so you cling to your faith instead of opening your eyes and challenging your assumptions.

>>24666349
>For the majority of human history we’ve been rejected and excluded by people like you
>majority of human history
Only in Judaized golem societies

>>24666172
holy projection

>>24666349
>Honestly I think people like you are upset because you believe in a God created ordered world. And now schools and other power structures force you to confront different views that show how wrong an ordered God centric reality really is. And so you cling to your faith instead of opening your eyes and challenging your assumptions.

The irony. As if liberalism and post-modernism aren't far more often dogmatically forced upon children through education.

The only philosophy or philosophy adjacent stuff I read through high school and our core diversity curricula type classes in college was Saphir-Worf pomo stuff, Nietzsche, Kundera, Morrison, some Marxist stuff like Black Boy, Camus, and some Enlightenment liberals.

We also got the pitch: "science says the world is little balls of stuff and everything is just them bouncing. Hence, all meaning purpose or beauty is a sort of hallucination. But that's ok because we're free to create all value" as the dominant world view, even though this metaphysics is long defuct in physics itself (I assume it is still dogmatically taught because the privatization of values is essential to liberalism's justification of itself). And I bought it because it was forcefed to me until I discovered that these ideas aren't new "and what science says is true," but ancient and also BTFO throughout history.

>>24666057 (OP)
what's insane to me is that he did it even just once, vile freak

>>24666377
Post modernism rather appropriately doesn’t have a formal definition. At its core though is the recognition of a multitude of truths derived from a multitude of perspectives. Personally I find this the closest to any kind of objective truth. It matches up to what I’ve observed as well.

In fact your own likely visceral reaction to reading marxist works or works advocating for homosexuality kind of confirms that. Because those worlds are completely foreign to you, they likely just seem incorrect and wrong and you then feel angry that you have to read them in the first place.

I don’t think much is dogmatically enforced other than a much broader set of works in the past. And this broader set of works doesn’t lead the reader to any real truth rather to just a multitude of perspectives. And honestly that’s where the real truth is.

No description of how the world works from either a philosopher or scientist has ever held up to all criticism. All we have is approximations and so far a physics text book is more correct and holds up to criticism more than any religious work.

>>24666349
I don't believe in a God created world as you say. My belief is however that, as opposed to the poststructuralists and all intellectual movements that come from them, there is a natural world that has conditioned the human form in a certain way. Cultural expressions differ and different cultures can stand in a better or worse relationship to this world. What poststructuralism and its offspring and also Christianity in it's denying of the world does, is inverting the natural order and conditions us to worship weakness, to elevate the marginal to the normal. Worship of weakness and deviation from the world degenerates the human form.

>>24666118
It's so fucking wild to me that homosexual successfully create this "sensitive intellectual boy" auras around them when their whole shtick is basically putting your penis in another man's anal cavity and they're much more likely than heterosexuals to engage in pure hedonistic sex without any emotional engagement

>>24666562
I'm not interested in anal sex at all.

>>24666558
midwit retard, kys

>>24666591
Ok so your argument is
>no endless volumes of academic masturbation ergo midwit

>>24666600
you conflate aberration with degeneration

>>24666558
Leftism = worshiping weakness
Heterosexuality = worshiping weakness (femininity)
Heterosexuality = leftism (degeneration)

>>24666273
I find his theories useful for extrapolating my own despite his proclivities. Aquinas is also a notable influence.

>>24666605
>>24666615
nah

>>24666615
TRVKE

>>24666273
>Mankiw and Kotler on the same list as Marx and Plato
Holy shit we really are fucked as a society aren't we?

>>24666273
>Cicero and Epictetus
>Key ancient thinkers
99% chance this poster is overweight btw

>>24666349
>You take an extreme example of one person in SF being used as the norm - it’s not.
Let's be honest bro, Grindr is proof enough that an extremely libertine lifestyle is the norm for gays.

Without a woman to moderate sexual impulses, these things spiral out of control. I think that's why the taboo against homosexuality emerged: male-on-male sex inevitably leads to destructive behavior. For the record I don't think gays should be discriminated against.

>>24666057 (OP)
Foucault was pretty edgy during his youth though

>>24666765
damn that's some peterson tier drip

>>24666757
>using grindr as an argument
are you baiting or genuinely a brainlet? what about tinder and other apps which have a shitton of heterosexuals engaging in an extremely libertine lifestyle, you imbecile?

>>24666757
I know a lot of gay people and their lifestyle does not seem to be "destroying" them, if anything they're more cultured and successful than most straights.

>>24666765
he looks like a chud here

>>24666778
>uhhh excuse me, so what if guys on grindr snort poppers and eat the shit of 5+ strangers under a "rim seat" per week, a minority of attractive straight people on tinder occasionally date eachother normally and some of them even hook up and have sex with a condom

>>24666778
One can go on Grindr and arrange for sex that night. You can go on Tinder and be in a drought for months. If anything the disparity between the heterosexual male experience on Tinder and the gay male experience on Grindr highlights how much more libertine/open/casual sex culture becomes without the moderating influence of women.

>>24666778
The average sexual lifestyle of heterosexuals and homosexuals is not even remotely comparable. There's nothing wrong with being gay, but don't pretend it's similar.

>>24667107
Yes. I also don't argue that gays should be discriminated against. It is however pathological for a society to normalize it. It is only normalized because people are fed a false image of the gay lifestyle through popular media. If people realized what it's really like, it would become marginal again.

>>24667074
>a minority of attractive straight people on tinder occasionally date eachother normally and some of them even hook up and have sex with a condom
holy cope

>>24667093
>You can go on Tinder and be in a drought for months
yes, but that's because a woman won't sleep with an average guy that easily
if you're hot-looking, then you can arrange for sex on the same night
the only limiting factor in heterosexual relationships is the pickiness of women, otherwise the amount of hookups would be as big as it is on grindr
>moderating influence of women
except they're having sex themselves, but with hot guys
are you some redpilled trad retard?

>>24667107
cope

>>24667093
I will also add that I agree the introduction of easier methods of arranging casual sex, like Tinder, has/will introduce serious problems for heterosexuals analogous to the ones the gay community’s approach to sex has cause for them. I probably come across like I’m ragging on gays here but it’s not about gays in particular.

>>24667119
>the only limiting factor in heterosexual relationships is the pickiness of women, otherwise the amount of hookups would be as big as it is on grindr
….I agree, that’s what I’ve been saying. This is a good thing btw

>are you some redpilled trad
No, red pill ideology dehumanizes everyone, man and woman alike. As for “trad”, not really. I just think things like sex are not to be taken lightly.

>>24666273
The West has truly fallen...

>>24667170
The fact that there's a "pornography is right-wing" thread up right now in the face of this sort of shit is just hilarious. Left-wingers trying to pass off porn and faggotry and degeneracy as somehow right-wing is absolutely pure projection on their part, when they have guys like Foucault or Adorno or Sartre on their team. Sure, you can accuse the occasional right-wing thinker of being a hypocrite on this matter, but just as many of them were true believers, and frankly there's a part of me that would rather have the hypocrites than the open degenerates. At least the hypocrites don't deliberately try to transmit their perversion down to the midwits and the lower classes to oneshot them, as has happened in the last 80 years of the Left's ascendancy.

>>24667186
In fairness to the left, open degeneracy is not something that the USSR or modern China would tolerate. (Not that degeneracy doesn’t/didn’t exist there but it’s much more behind closed doors than the West.)

>>24667186
Homosexuality is right-wing.

>>24667163
>This is a good thing btw
why?

>>24667205
>Adorno again

I'm not going to take seriously a man who had a mental breakdown listening to Miles Davis.

>>24667186
>guy who watches sexualized cartoons complaining about porn
no self-awareness at all

>>24667244
and this refutes what i said how? not too bright huh

>>24667267
It means you're a tourist. Anime reaction images have been a staple of 4chan culture for more than 20 years. It's entirely natural at this point to attach them to posts that have nothing to do with anime.

>>24667205
>Jack Donovan
>Greg Johnson.
Hmm. Makes you wonder. I still agree with them on a lot of things.

>>24666249
Sorry about your experience, anon. The worst part is having to see them once in a while. I don't even know what you should do. Jesus does not have an answer for this. Killing them would only get you into trouble. If there was only another way to get vengeance and destroy their lives forever. But you have to plot it carefully so they don't catch you.

>>24667205
There is no proof, whatsoever, that Jewish thinkers trying to discredit fascism are doing anything more than seething over the Holocaust. So much of what Adorno, Reich, etc. write has no objective metric of judging things and is basically them pulling ideas out of their asses. Jews go out of their way to make fascism look bad because fascism killed 6 million of them.

Which, you know what? That's fine. I suppose if I were in their position I'd do the same thing. But it's something you have to keep in mind when reading certain thinkers, with certain last names, writing about fascism.

>>24666580
you are missing out

>>24666057 (OP)
Thousands of children

>>24667402
Hot, brown boys..

>>24666112

Anon, how do you know this

This genuinely might be the worst thread ive ever seen on this board, and the worst part is how far i had to scroll to find anyone thay pointed exactly that out.
Theres a difference between low quality threads, and threads that fundamentally indicate something other than /lit/. "Literature" used tangentially to twist the capacity for understanding into narrative.

In a Schopenhauer thread. Somebody would already be here saying his mothers distaste for him, or his general misogyny has nothing to do with the substance of his work. Here instead, I see insecure retards accepting the framing and preconception imposed, basically trying to go "Yeah he raped kids but!" Not even any remotely intelligent challenge or questioning or inquiring. Just laying down the floor for the fundamentally unjustified notion, to stand on without any basis, and foundation needed for it to have to grow from, and therefore no root for it to be cut from, due to a wholly artificial "object" with no root, allowed to be decorated and simply witnessed.

>>24666070
Freud literally says that anal sex isn't just a fascmile of heterovaginal coitus in the first like 10 pages of Three Essays on Sexuality

>>24666118
type of nigga on roblox and discord with an anime pfp but has progressive politics on bluesky

>>24667205
wtf i love communism now

>>24666112
Yes how do you know this

>>24666280
What about Agamben's application of it? And what if you cross it with Scholasticism?

>>24666349
NTA but I do believe there's a middle way

>>24667163
>red pill ideology dehumanizes everyone,
Seems like a not-so-subtle attempt to excuse female misbehavior under an all encompassing "what about humanity" screed. Proudhon would have a field day with you.

>>24666057 (OP)
Personally, I am a homosexual pedophile and find homosexuality between adult men to be disgusting. It should be illegal.

>>24666057 (OP)
We can all dream

>>24668010
it used to be.

If getting laid is so easy for gays then how come I’m an incel

>>24666118
All I see in this is death and disease. Horrifying shit.