Thread 24668241

I asked a simple question about Kierkegaard and Heidegger and literally just one anon answered >>24665701

Wtf?

Autism killed philosophy on /lit/ ages ago.

>>24668246
I might just have to search on reddit I guess.

>>24668249
plate.stanford.edu is good, generally gets me the answers I want and a whole lot more. 99% of the time I don't even have to dig into the references, which are extensive but occasionally I do have to read a good number of related articles but its not so bad and provides better answer than i have ever gotten from forums.

>>24668258
>plate.stanford.edu
plato.standford.edu

>>24668241 (OP)
I have an interest in German historicism and French post-structuralism as well as some Scholastic and neo-Scholastic philosophy. I wasn't aware you made a thread. though I found Kierkegaard much more valuable for his prose than his content and have never cared much for Heidegger (however it has little to do with him being Nazi, for which I couldn't care less about)

I just read a book about the history of Plywood.
Before that I read a book about the history quarantine.
Before that was Wool by Hugh Howey.
Also, Games Without Rules, a selection of short stories by Michael Gilbert.

>>24668241 (OP)
meh stick around the current meme theme changes every few weeks

>>24668241 (OP)
Kierkekard is is good. Heidegger is also good. Read both. Kierkekard's earlier so read it first. The only thing required to read Heidegger really is Kant

>>24668373
I was asking because I am interested in a specific theme(subjectivity) and thought maybe Kierkegaard as a whole maybe wasn't necessary.

>>24668380
Kierkegaard has nothing to do with subjectivity.

>>24668241 (OP)
Sometimes people skim through Evola quotes.

>>24668241 (OP)
As the sticky says, philosophy goes into /his/ unless you are talking about an specific book.

>>24668427
Well, since you mentioned it, care to enlighten us on any particular literature that could be of use to OP?

>>24668241 (OP)
God I want to fuck Darkness

I'm working my way through Evola!

>>24668241 (OP)
Patricians prefer Megumin.

>>24668241 (OP)
It’s a retarded question: there is no ‘more modern’ in philosophy.

They’re doing ebtirely different things. Hei-tan is a German university professor creating a complete metaphysical system, whilst Kierkegaard is just trying to work through his neuroses with a Hegelian vibe.

Why do you want to read either? The coolkid existentialist motif appeals? Then you should read novels, not philosophy. Read Dostoevsky, Camus and Kafka, maybe Sartre if your taste is shit enough.
Ask me something else if you want; making such a shitty bait thread means you’ve put in more effort than most.

>>24668380
Oh why didn't you say so? The answer is always the same. Go back to sucking dicks in your shitbox. Every single one of the most famous subjectivist philosophers failed to stumble upon any sort of eternal truth. An actual Descartes is alright, an imitator is worthless. If a Nietzsche wants to use some form of rationality then it's alright, otherwise it shuts up. Kierkegaard goes back to Christianity and telling people to either do something or don't and that only works a few times, then he shuts up. Heidegger can be a top notch philosopher, otherwise he already knows how this works. Marx in full alienation has to decide whether something can even be conveyed at all since he basically has taken a process and treated it like an object then also managed to personalize it. The Marx came to the conclusion everything is hostile, his version stands, anything else leaves people in the same dilemma and this might cause thinking, he just goes back to whatever he was doing. Berkeley always shuts up. His philosophy has been gamed out extensively, rest his soul. Kant goes back to math and science. Fichte realizes the natural state might be too much for some people.

>you have something relevant or you don't

>>24668241 (OP)
Because greeks estabilished everything on human nature, marx and nietzsche are the dualisms that drove the last century and our era.
We lost every religious root so nobody gives a flying fuck about the dualism betwkeen K. and Hegel because that's something that was important 200 years ago and stagnates there.

>>24670108
Never had roots. This is why you're just an imitator. Hume goes back to the parlour. The traditionalists realize there are no inherent traditions and go back to their shitboxes. Hegel doesn't have to leave his lab, everyone else figures out why. The idiots complain about dualism, once they realize they confirm it everytime they talk, they shut up or go back to sucking dick.

>>24670158
I don't even bother, go back to high school atheist cunt.

>>24670164
You can't respond. You can justify it however you like. I don't want you sucking my dick so go find something else to shove in your mouth like the good bitch you are.

I only need the Greeks
Everything after is redundant