← Home ← Back to /lit/

Thread 24668734

42 posts 8 images /lit/
Anonymous No.24668734 >>24668735 >>24668810 >>24669201 >>24669217 >>24669220 >>24669220 >>24669223 >>24669275 >>24669280 >>24669417 >>24669428 >>24669440 >>24669445 >>24669677 >>24669679 >>24669681 >>24669684 >>24671818 >>24672933
>woman
>"I love reading"
>look inside
>romance novels
Do nerdy girls even exist?
Anonymous No.24668735 >>24669391 >>24669662
>>24668734 (OP)
Yes but i get the feeling most of us wouldnt be attracted to those girls, nor would i want to date a girl like this. Just a simple woman who can conversate well and listen better is all i want.
Anonymous No.24668810
>>24668734 (OP)
>Do nerdy girls even exist?
No. Although they sometimes larp as nerds to get attention.
Anonymous No.24669201 >>24669427
>>24668734 (OP)
Women who like the books you like are lesbians, asexual, trannies, and bisexual liberal freaks. They hate chuds like you. Literally any artsy girl is going to be the most insufferable, suicidally empathetic liberal you've ever met in your life.
Anonymous No.24669217 >>24669427
>>24668734 (OP)
yes that would be my sister who readmogs 99.9% of this board, but she's asexual and autistic.
Anonymous No.24669220
>>24668734 (OP)
Yeah, but they're rare >>24668734 (OP)
Anonymous No.24669223
>>24668734 (OP)
The closest thing you're going to get to having a nerdy gf who reads the books you like is by picking up a young, shut-in virgin who's never even held hands with a guy before and introducing her to everything you like. Very unlikely to just stumble across a girl like that but even more unlikely to find one who's naturally like that
Anonymous No.24669275
>>24668734 (OP)
They do exist, but it's needle in a haystack stuff. The reality is more men are going to have literary tastes which resemble your own and are half-decent (emphasis on half here. The probability of finding someone with great taste equates to the probability of a blood diamond turning up in the mail one day).

I've dated two girls with pretty good taste in lit, but neither of them were born in a Western country. I think other anons are probably right that the usual pipeline for 'artsy' girls in the US or whatever is to end up loving literary fiction with a sprinkling of Jane Austen and the Brontes, Oscar Wilde, and maybe Rilke, Camus, and Flaubert at a stretch.

I dated one girl from China and another from Georgia and both had pretty great taste in lit with none of what you might associate with woke brain atrophy. But again, culturally it's different because literature in those societies is still cast in a much more classical mould and higher esteem.
Anonymous No.24669280 >>24669388
>>24668734 (OP)
>man
>"I love reading non-fiction"
>look inside
>philosophy
Anonymous No.24669388 >>24669565
>>24669280
I think history is the more common answer outside of /lit/
Which is less common than self-help books
Which is dwarfed by the true fodder of the peasant masses: biographies
Anonymous No.24669391 >>24669421
>>24668735

Speak for yourself. I need a dominant alternative feminist girl with ambitions and obscure tastes
Anonymous No.24669417
>>24668734 (OP)
>Do nerdy girls even exist?
No, by definition.
Nerd = fixation on an often-complicated thing for itself.
Men view the world as a system, with varying levels of elaboration and accuracy. Middling men can aspire to be nerds. Good and great men use their powers of abstraction to ascend the category and change the world. Men relate to each other in this way as competing abstract systems with rival world-models and agendas to change the world. This is why in school the "jocks" command more respect, and why in life "nerds" can never be more than worker-bees.
Women's brains work completely differently. They might as well be a different species. They view the world as a loose network of relationships. Individuals do not exist deprived of these relationships, and things are not for themselves, but simple tools to gauge or alter a relationship. There is only the web. The web, much like a real web, likes equilibrium and hates disruption. That is why women are all far more similar to each other than men are to each other. That also is why there are no true female "nerds": even women who advance very far in a male-dominated subject usually do so for some social-relational reason, or they are autistic lesbians. Either way, they spoil healthy, natural male competition just by being there.
The phenomenon you are describing, OP, is really very simple: romantic fiction is like a drug for women. Our male brains can view it as the abstraction it is, but the female brain, incapable of abstracting in the same way, is actually deeply captured by it. It simulates the relational-web through which women automatically view everything and draws them deeply in as a result. It is one of the only kinds of "art," if you can call it that, that women are capable of enjoying. Really, it bears as much resemblance to male art as a chimpanzee taking a selfie.
Anonymous No.24669421 >>24671262
>>24669391
You are not really a man. You would have no place in a better society. You'd have been left behind long ago.
Anonymous No.24669427
>>24669201
>>24669217
These anons are close to the mark. Note that women who really, properly engage in male spaces become psychologically and often physically degraded. The same is obviously true of men acting like women.
It was with reason that classical societies segregated men and women, with scant, supervised, ritual spaces for meeting. Awareness and pull towards the other makes men and women better. But mixing degrades both utterly.
Anonymous No.24669428 >>24669430
>>24668734 (OP)
I have a female friend who studies ancient Greek and Latin and is really into greek epics and tragedies, my gf is an English major and her primary interest is interwar to postwar American literature, from Fitzgerald, Faulkner, and Hemingway to Thompson and Didion. Then probably the most naturally intelligent person I know personally is one of my female cousins who has a focus on English literature, particularly the romantics, but has a very wide knowledge of literature from Homer to the modernists. The only problem is that they’re all autistic and mentally ill to varying degrees.
Anonymous No.24669430
>>24669428
I'm sorry to hear that, anon. I hope these damaged women can live out the remainder of their days peacefully.
Anonymous No.24669440 >>24669443
>>24668734 (OP)
No they don't. You will not find someone who will fall into autistic rabbit holes on the Paris catacombs.
Anonymous No.24669443
>>24669440
The catacombs. What a lovely metaphor. The nerd falls into catacombs, and the damaged woman twice as deep, while the great man soars.
Anonymous No.24669445
>>24668734 (OP)
Look inside of what?
Anonymous No.24669565
>>24669388
No, the bottom of the barrel is philosophy along with psychology.
Anonymous No.24669662
>>24668735
What you really want is a woman who's first interest is YOU. She will then show total interest and support of your hobbies while playing animal villagers or whatever on her switch and everything will be peachy.
Anonymous No.24669677 >>24669702 >>24669734
>>24668734 (OP)
Blame men if they are rare. Women aren't allowed to enjoy anything in peace, after they hit puberty if they are even in the slightest cute they will be pestered by men to have social interactions wherever they go. They need to constantly second-guess every talk and be on guard against us. They live under constant social pressure to perform and be pretty. They cannot (if again they are cute) enter a room and act as if they were not noticed - because they will be noticed and people will talk about them.
We suffer from loneliness but we also have more freedom. Asking for women to be nerdy like men implies treating them differently on a daily basis, and not encouraging the kind of predatory mindset that makes them act like they do now.
Anonymous No.24669679 >>24671319 >>24671813
>>24668734 (OP)
Its easier to convince girls to read 50s sci-fi than it is for me to find a man that would voluntarily read any book at all
Anonymous No.24669681
>>24668734 (OP)
You're gonna be disappointed when you find out the majority of them are immigrants attending uni/college.
Anonymous No.24669684
>>24668734 (OP)
Yes

Not very common though
Anonymous No.24669702 >>24669722
>>24669677
>blame men
Spoken by a well-propagandized low-T failure as a man. Either that or gay. Either way, the wall with you.
It is the nature of men to hunger, and that hunger, when channeled productively, is what has built empires.
It is the nature of women to be bashful and considerate if their wicked, vengeful side, inherent to them all, is properly suppressed. When controlled, this nature is what nurtures great generations.
What you are describing, faggot, IS real, but not for the reason you think. When men and women are allowed to mingle freely in public space, both are greatly degraded. Women start performing for male attention and become corrupted, and the natural hunger of men goes into a great black hole, draining a generation of its vitality. A few unfortunate women are more deeply corrupted and try earnestly to take on men's roles, in which, without the natural fire of competition in them, they can never be happy. A few especially hideous men take female moralizing seriously and actually become ashamed of their natural strength: that is you. In a better world, the former will be put out to pasture to live out the rest of their days, since like poorly taught children, it isn't their fault; the latter, however, will be shot as an example.
Anonymous No.24669722 >>24669724
>>24669702
Not negging or anything, but your writing is beautiful. Have you written a book? Do you plan to?
Anonymous No.24669724
>>24669722
No, but I plan to start a substack.
Anonymous No.24669734 >>24669741
>>24669677
>They live under constant social pressure to perform and be pretty.
>Blame men
The amount of pressure women put on other women to socially perform is immense. I do not envy them.
Anonymous No.24669741
>>24669734
This is my point. Women see the world as a vast social web centering around themselves, and like spiders, dislike disruptions to the fibres.
They enforce conformity more than anyone. In a healthy society, this drive produces well-adjusted children and adults with a sense of duty and honor. In this sick society, where women are polluted by the readily available incentive of masculine attention, it produces more maladjusted women and sicker children, where it produces any.
Anonymous No.24671174 >>24671176
>man
>"i love reading"
>look inside
>self help slop and pop history
Anonymous No.24671176 >>24671183
>>24671174
This.
Go on OP. Share us the last 3 books you read.
Anonymous No.24671183
>>24671176
Vozes anoitecidas by Mia Couto, Romanceiro da inconfidencia by Cecilia Meireles and La perra by Pilar Quintana. All great ;)
Anonymous No.24671185
Books are garbage, I never read anything cover to cover except a manual.
Anonymous No.24671262 >>24671795
>>24669421

I'm nonbinary
Anonymous No.24671319 >>24671813
>>24669679
Right? Those complaints feel so random
Anonymous No.24671795
>>24671262
Lovely. To the wall with you this instant.
Anonymous No.24671813
>>24669679
>>24671319
Most of my irl male friend group reads books. Many of their reading lists are populated by books which are perceived to scare the hoes, either due to niche nerdiness or politically/socially incorrect themes. You can find some Anons discussing their struggles with this problem in this thread >>24666678
Anonymous No.24671818
>>24668734 (OP)
>romance novels
you mean the most debased smut
Anonymous No.24671837 >>24672867
what you want is a man
Anonymous No.24672867
>>24671837
Gaaaaaaaay
Anonymous No.24672933
>>24668734 (OP)
WTF did you make this incel thread from 4 years ago? it uses the same pepe

get fucking help