>>24677197
>>24677400
Think you're actually just wrong about that too. The upper and lower classes are pretty comparable, pretty close. It's the middle class specifically that (Welles once said) are the enemy of society.
In the last century in England, there was a big thing about 'U and non-U' (U standing for upper class), which found that there were many similarities in the use of language between the upper and lower class, whereas the middle class tended to use 'fancier', French words for things, in attempts to make themselves sound more refined ('posher than posh'), while the upper classes stick to the same plain and traditional words that the working classes also use, as, confident in the security of their social position, they have no need to seek to display refinement.
The upper and lower classes are both rooted in tradition, they both name their children Jack and Charlotte, it's the middle that feel the need to give them names like Percy and Felicity.