Thread 24676489

realistically they'd file motion to dismiss and nothing ever happens

civ pro mogs

>>24676489 (OP)
not appropriate for the UK legal environment. what they were supposed to say was
>we refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v Pressdram

>>24676489 (OP)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

fuck those euroweenies

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

bunch of clowns

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

adolescent/10

>hiroshimoot posturing in a court case could get the site shut down
where will we go once 4chan finally closes?

>>24676799
>>24676495
>>24676514
>>24676767
Euro faggots seething KEEEEEK

>>24676799
They are using that language because they want to tap the "america #1" sentiment of the trump admin.

>4chan's lawyer's dabbing all over european socialists
4chan sucks but it makes me love this site even more

>>24676938
oh please everyone in tech knows the only innovation europe is capable of is finding new ways to extract fines from successful american companies

AMERICA FUCK YEAH

LMAOOOOOOOO

>>24676947
oh sorry for not being amoral psychopaths whose only purpose is to profit off manipulating the user, selling his data to the highest bidder, not respecting user's privacy, ignoring copyright law (hello ai companies!) and destroying what was once the web into 5 closed platforms. Thanks, American innovation, very cool!

>>24676975
What are alternatives?

>>24676799
>could get the site shut down
lmao
>>24676938
It also happens to be reality.

>>24676799
altchans but they'll probably block those too

>>24676975
No you just support a different set of amoral psychopaths whose only purpose is profiting off those that produce.

>>24676985
The alternative is not doing it, you goddamn sociopath. Do you not have a modicum of morality? Do you really need a law stating that it is bad to ruin entire generations by making them grow up with evil technology to know that you shouldn't do that?

>>24676993
>n-no you!!
Thanks for admitting defeat.

>>24676996
>t. deadend

>>24676998
And when OFCOM backs down, because they will?

>>24676489 (OP)
What will america do about intel offshoring its chip manufacture since chips are a massively strategic resource?

Ahahahha. Britbongs btfo'd

>>24676996
>evil technology
No such thing. Humans create evil.

>>24676489 (OP)
pmsl

>>24677013
>This is why, dear stakeholders, valued investors, we should release the DopaDestroy™ recommendation algorithm for our social media platform, which obliterates the intellectual abilities of our youngest users (8-14) but increases revenue by 6.66%.

>>24677052
Humans are taking those decision. Tech has no will of its own. Parents are also responsible.

>>24676958
is this satire?
>Lolcow LLC

>>24676809
Motion to dismiss is in US civil procedure, you knuckle-dragging tard. UK would be application to dismiss. Why are you in this thread if you don’t know anything?

>UK Office of Communications
How do you retards expect to show that a U.S. district court has personal jurisdiction over a foreign government regulatory authority?

>>24677333
You are the one who is retarded. They made this retarded move first and ordered 4chan to be UK's bitch.

>>24677320
It is just a legal shitpost by 4chan to tell UK to fuck off and leave it alone.

Bringing down the UK government might just be our masterpiece.
>4chan wins case
>every other US company immediately does the same
>Trump says go fuck yourself
>Starmer forced to ask his own regulators to ignore his own legislation
>no confidence vote
>Farage wins landslide
>mass deportations begin before Christmas

>>24677356
>>24677387
>OP says rate the “legal prose”
None of you read.

>>24676799
Get a vpn and shit post as usual

Can I get a QRD. Qhat are yuropoors trying to do to 4chon?

>>24677356
>They made this retarded move first and ordered 4chan to be UK's bitch.
Wrong again, retard. The plaintiff (4chan) is the one moving first, as they are the ones pleading some kind of claim for relief from the defendant (OFCOM).

The defendants can file a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, since there is nothing to suggest a US district court has authority to order an organization from the UK to do anything. That’s like a state court from Louisiana ordering you (from Faggotland) to stop sucking your dick. You won’t stop, and they can’t make you.

>>24677410
You are a retard. They threatened 4chan first.

>>24677408
>On April 14, Ofcom issued a ‘formal information notice’ to 4chan demanding a copy of its Illegal Content Risk Assessment and not surprisingly, received no reply.
>Not only has 4chan hired extremely capable attorneys in response to Ofcom’s threats, any action by Ofcom will be resisted in the United States under Federal Law.
>Since Ofcom’s threats are viewed as undermining 4chan’s constitutional rights, its attorneys believe that no court in America will allow foreign penalties to be enforced in the United States. Once people begin speaking about that, the damage will have been done.
>By selecting 4chan as a potential target for enforcement, knowing all too well it would refuse to comply, a stand-off has been engineered between UK censorship measures nobody asked for, and the constitutional rights of all Americans.

>>24677421
>Retard is no better than a broken record
What does that have to do with my original reply about personal jurisdiction?So fucking dumb lmao

>>24677058
>Parents are also responsible.

I‘m more used to seeing this argument referenced in terms of adult media but the same as in that instance, there‘s something uniquely egomaniacal about expecting people who have put their whole life into raising another person to engage in a still higher degree of hyperdiligence, not to mention that the monitoring required isn‘t really healthy for the kids, so that you can get your slop more conveniently and/or easy tech profits without the hassle of social responsibility.

>>24677397
>Farage wins landslide
>mass deportations begin before Christmas

Are you retarded?

>>24677438
>A lawyer representing the online message board 4chan says it won't pay a proposed fine by the UK's media regulator as it enforces the Online Safety Act.

>According to Preston Byrne, managing partner of law firm Byrne & Storm, Ofcom has provisionally decided to impose a £20,000 fine "with daily penalties thereafter" for as long as the site fails to comply with its request.

>"Ofcom's notices create no legal obligations in the United States," he told the BBC, adding he believed the regulator's investigation was part of an "illegal campaign of harassment" against US tech firms.

>Ofcom has declined to comment while its investigation continues.
"4chan has broken no laws in the United States - my client will not pay any penalty," Mr Byrne said.

4chin just wants to stir shit up. They could have just ignored them.

>>24677460
>They could have just ignored them.
That’s what I’m saying. Filing a suit is just wasting money since the US district court is probably going to say “we have no jurisdiction” to impose “a legal ban on the UK communications regulator.” They should have waited for OFCOM to sue them, since then OFCOM would have to prove the law is enforceable on US soil. Which it isn’t…so easy win for 4chan.

>>24676489 (OP)
>Rate 4chan's legal prose
It's got a good beat and I can dance to it

>>24677482
ofcoom would have pressured banks to drop 4chan. nobody was standing up against their threats so 4chin did for teh lulz. there must be some millionaire crypto mods so yeah.

>>24677506
>ofcoom would have pressured banks to drop 4chan
That’s a good point….though if they did there would be a stronger basis of financial damages that the ofcoomers should have to pay. Will be interesting to see this through