Thread 24683631

What's your favorite erotic literature?

Lolita

bump

shir hashirim

>>24683631 (OP)
Story of the eye

>>24683631 (OP)
Crash

My Secret Life by "Walter" - A pseudonymous and exhaustive and explicit lifelong diary of sexual encounters by a man who lived through the Victorian Age. Widely believed to be truthful and accurate because of the amount of embarrassing and realistic encounters compared to other Victorian "pornotopia" erotica such as Romance of Lust and stories featured in The Pearl magazine.
The Story of My Life by Giacoma Casanova - Another autobiography chronicling the writer's entire life, this time set throughout 18th century Europe. The "Chevalier Casanova" was an eminent con man, seducer of women, pretend mystic, gambler and adventurer. Features accounts of many sexual encounters (less explicitly described than in My Secret Life) and also many non-sexual adventures that are entertaining on their own. Scholars debate how accurate it is but so far nothing has been disproven, and it's considered an invaluable resource on the day to day life of 18th century people. Just the first few chapters include: a visit to a witch who has black cats, a nighttime apparition descending down a chimney, a faked possession and exorcism, and a threesome with two ladies. Throughout the book Casanova meets significant figures of the time including Voltaire, Catherine the Great, and Mozart. Massively long read though, several thousand pages. It's been most commonly published in an extremely censored version but the uncensored can now be acquired quite easily.

>>24685668
Casanova reads like Forrest Gump or some other historical fiction featuring an implausible hero but it's all ostensibly true, the guy who did the uncensored translation even found boxes and boxes of letters from old lovers delivered to Casanova as an old man. He's one of the most interesting documented people to ever live. The story near the beginning with Casanova traveling across the Papal states from the Adriatic to Rome with a demented friar that keeps accidentally killing peasants and Casanova can't get rid of the guy could be a novella of its own.

>>24685668
>An Actual Rapist's Rape Diary and An Actual Rapist's Rape Diary (Italian Edition)

>>24686068
>>An Actual Rapist's Rape Diary and An Actual Rapist's Rape Diary (Italian Edition)

The Confessions of Saint Augustine
https://youtu.be/-p0kwWYYa_g

>>24683631 (OP)
I just get Grok to write hardcore gooner smut about whatever erotic fantasy comes to mind

>>24686111
Waiting for some sedevacantist filipino larper to get mad in this thread after clicking on this video

>>24683631 (OP)
Read a bunch of different shit over the years. I just write my own at this point. The story of O wasn't bad

>>24686147
Fuck you

>>24683666
Overdone meme
>>24684867
Funny but christcucks aren't intelligent enough to be baited by it
>>24684870
>>24685496
Weird asf nigga

>>24685668
God tier effortpost
>>24686111
Good bait, simple, effective
>>24686131
>>24686462
Shit, low effort

>>24683631 (OP)
>>>/hm/ greentexts

bempo

>>24683631 (OP)
Nicomachean Ethics

>>24685668
>My Secret Life by "Walter"
>The accumulators of my ballocks must have been gorged with sperm. Off and on all day my prick had been on the stand, I had feared to touch it lest it should go off, nor had I put the girl's hand on to it; the last-hour my prick had been erect without subsiding. As my belly met hers a tremor shook my whole frame. “My God, shall I spend outside?” thought I; my prick like an iron rod touched the top of the wet slit and slid right down on its passage. Is she virgin? a sharp cry, “Oh I don't hurt me”, I felt an obstacle, pushed violently again and again, “oh! oh! don't”, and then throb, throb, throb, with each throb a jet of sperm shot out against the mouth of the orifice I had not penetrated, I lost my power in the contentment of a copious emission, and the pleasurable certainty, that no prick had yet been up the hole against which mine had been battering.
lmao pretty gud. and he wrote 4000 pages of this?

>>24689004
What kind of personal hygiene did girls have back in those times?
Please answer quick

>>24689004
Yeah 4000 pages and it gets increasingly degenerate. He basically becomes rich and spends all his money on being a pervert
>>24689038
Better than you're probably expecting. This book proves that people had much more sex in the past and that no one was really ignorant about it like people today imagine. People use condoms in this book and in Casanova.

>>24689119
Also it thoroughly disproves the nonsensical /pol/ism that white men don't like big butts

>>24683631 (OP)
The Commedia is the greatest work on the erotic ascent. It leaves mere lust behind, although it revists it in healed forms in the Purgatorio and the Heaven of Venus.

>>24689004
>Her arse-hole was at the level of my prick as I stood by the side of the sofa, my machine was like a rod of iron, my brains seemed on fire, I felt I was going to do something wrong, dreaded it, yet determined to do it. "Put it in, slowly," said she in a whisper. The hole opened, felt tight, but to my astonishment almost directly my whole prick was hidden in it without pain to me or any difficulty. "Give me your hand." I did. Again she began frigging herself with my fingers. "Rub, rub, push gently," she said, and I tried, but was getting past myself. "Now," said she with a spasmodic sort of half cry, half grunt. I felt my prick squeezed as in a vise, I shoved or rather scarcely began to do so when I discharged a week's reserve up her rectum. My brain whirled with excitement, whilst she, leaning over the pillows on the sofa, kept breathing hard and half snorting like a pig, still frigging herself with my fingers.

>As my senses returned, I could scarcely believe where my prick was; excitement still kept it stiff, but desire had left me. I pulled it out with an indescribable horror of myself.

>>24689119
>This book proves that people had much more sex in the past and that no one was really ignorant about it like people today imagine.
So we really are the most unfuckable generation?
Really though, how did they sustain such high marriage rates if everyone fucked like rabbits?

>>24689221
>So we really are the most unfuckable generation?
Yeah, it's really crazy. In some ways we pretend to be super progressive as societies while seeing past generations as prude but on the other hand I feel like technology has brutally isolated a sizable chunk of society.

here's an erotica sample. No shekels. Enjoy. More where that came from if you so wish.
https://moonquillnovels.com/book/portraits-in-perversion

>>24689221
They could more easily get away with adultery since there were no computers or phones or cameras. Just lift up the chubby maid's skirt in the other room and have a quick nut

>>24689221
They had high marriage rates because everyone fucked like rabbits.

>>24689038
Read Napoleon's letters to Josephine

>>24689221
>Really though, how did they sustain such high marriage rates if everyone fucked like rabbits?
muh pair bonding is a meme and so is muh virgin bride. they married because it made sense as an economic arrangement.

read some stuff on litrotica that changed me.

>>24689221
>how did they sustain such high marriage rates if everyone fucked like rabbits?
>He really fell for the tradwife/"marriage is the pillar of hwite civlization" meme
Grim.

>>24689119
>This book proves that people had much more sex in the past
It only shows that they had more sex than we generally imagine, but they certainly didn't have as much sex as people do now.
Looking at that book as an accurate representation of the norm of those days is like being a few centuries in the future and looking at someone's onlyfans videos and thinking it's how the average person lives.

The sci fi romance story I wrote for my ex where the main characters were thinly veiled versions of us. There was a lot of lesbian bdsm harem stuff too.

>>24689119
>This book proves that people had much more sex in the past and that no one was really ignorant about it like people today imagine. People use condoms in this book and in Casanova.
The 18th century was pre modern. It's closer to our lives today than it was to medieval times.

>>24689866
People have less sex now than ever before in history, life is almost completely sterilized for first worlders in comparison. The farther back in time you go the more sex was being had.

>>24689955
Maybe before Christianity, but not during it.
Zoomers in 2025 may be having less sex than in the past few decades, but that's just because there are so many shut-ins now and everyone is on the Internet instead of out. This doesn't mean that people aren't hypersexualized today, with one-night-stands, FWBs, hook-up apps, fetishes, lgbt, etc bring normalized and celebrated as positive, with more and more people publicly making them them entire life, parents being happy when their children are like this, etc.
Before modern times this was unthinkable, and extramarital affairs were kept secret and didn't happen nearly as often as today.
Not to mention how remaining a virgin until marriage was the norm, while now it's pretty much unheard of, with most girls losing their virginity in their teens (sometimes tweens).

>>24690123
FWBs and hook-up apps are basically coping tools to deal with the relative dearth of authentic relationships and organic sexual opportunities though.
They did basically have dating apps in the 20th century, it was called personals ads and matchmaker services, and they were the last resort of the lonely and desperate. Likewise the abundance of extreme fetishes are basically an outgrowth of stunted sexual development and repression.
>Not to mention how remaining a virgin until marriage was the norm
Getting married in your teens and 20s was also the norm. This would also be reaching way back to before the 1960s.

>>24689913
YWNBAW

>>24690161
I'm a tall guy with a beard and a right side out penis lol. My ex's character was doing the lesbian stuff on her own.

My diary............desu

Nicholson Baker, although some are straight up porn

>>24690141
>They did basically have dating apps in the 20th century, it was called personals ads and matchmaker services, and they were the last resort of the lonely and desperate.
>Getting married in your teens and 20s was also the norm.
You're talking about people getting into long-term/lifelong monogamous relationships.
Of course people were having sex with their wife/husband lol. That's not comparable to modern hookup culture and casual sex.

>the abundance of extreme fetishes are basically an outgrowth of stunted sexual development and repression.
Absolutely not.
Besides the fact that there's an infinitesimal amount of repression now compared to pretty much our entire history, fetishes today are almost always people getting gradually exposed to weirder and more extreme stuff through internet porn and the internet in general, usually in their teens.

>>24689148
damn, pretty much exactly what I imagine anal would be like. thank god I've never done it

>>24690595
That’s the point I’m making. In past times sex, reproduction, and partnerships were channelled into marrying young and having sex - which is itself a sexual outlet. Modern internet fetishism is not, it’s a facsimile of a sexual outlet. But it’s ubiquitous because modern social norms and economics disrupt what used to be normal sexual development.
Serial monogamy and friends with benefits type arrangements are a better adaptation to this than coomerism, but it’s suboptimal and even the people engaging in it usually know that. But the fact is for young people today in the modern west, even if everyone was a tradcath or something, modern economics is still shuffling vast amounts of the population around constantly and rendering relationships to be necessarily precarious. This is also the true reason why birth rates are higher for poor people, they more often settle in the same place and stay there at a younger age, or never leave their native community at all.
>That's not comparable to modern hookup culture and casual sex.
Which begins in the 1960s, and is rarer now than ever. People in the 1960s did not need third party matchmakers to meet people for casual sex, they just met people. This is the point I’m making, society is so totally atomised now that not only are traditional relationships neigh unattainable, people even need sophisticated matchmaking tools for one night stands. Shit is dystopian.

>>24690609
Ah we agree then.
I thought, perhaps because of the context of this discussion (being surprised at the sexual activities of these perverts) that you were talking about promiscuity, and not about the mere number of intercourses, since I see marital sex as the unsurprising norm that doesn't need to be mentioned (and also not the type of sex being commented on here).
To put it in modern terms, if I hear "this guy fucks", I think he's having frequent sexual relationships with multiple partners, not that he has a wife.

My apologies for the misunderstanding.

>>24683666

Nice bait, Satan

>>24689393
made up btw

>>24691162
>made
bricked* haha what a strange typo

>>24689221
>>24689249
>>24689955
>porn better than ever
>women worse than ever
can you blame us?

A few stories on asstr were decent and I still have fond memories of them. (Run, that one were-loli story I can't remember the name of, and a few more I can't remember the name of because it's been a decade or more and I have no hope of even looking them up anymore)

I haven't read too many actually published erotic books though.
Generally to be published means the actual subject matter has to be quite mild and can't touch on too many taboos and certainly can't dive directly into taboo subject matter. Especially now days in the age of page long trigger warnings and sensitivity readers, where people bitch about a collage student fucking their professor in a fictional story, and tentacle monsters are super concerned with flawless feminist approved affirmative consent.
I can't imagine there is anything in mainstream erotica that I would find all that interesting.

>>24685668
>Then I was in our house in a carpeted room with her; it could not have
>been the nursery I know, sitting on the floor with my toys, so was she;
>she played with me and the toys, we rolled over each other on the floor
>in fun, I have a recollection of having done that with others, and of my
>father and mother, being in that room at times with me playing.

>She kissed me, got out my cock, and played with it, took one of my hands
>and put it underneath her clothes. It felt rough there, that's all, she
>moved my little hand violently there then she felt my cock and again
>hurt me, I recollect seeing the red tip appear as she pulled down the
>prepuce, and my crying out, and her quieting me.

>>24692183
This brings back unhappy memories. Poor Walter.

>>24692197
He also writes a few paragraphs later that he had forgotten about that memory for twenty years. Guy was sexually abused as a child.

>>24692211
That's what my experience was like. Suddenly connected the dots and remembered things while I was driving and the despair almost made me drive into incoming traffic.

>>24690123
>Maybe before Christianity, but not during it.
This is cope. They were absolutely having more sex than people do now, so no, browneating people about going to church is not the solution to heckin duhjennerassy
>Before modern times this was unthinkable, and extramarital affairs were kept secret and didn't happen nearly as often as today.
Dead wrong. Adultery happened more because it was far easier to get away with and anybody middle class and higher usually had at least one servant in the home. Men would have multiple families in the same city and fully get away with, with people only finding out with DNA ancestry services in the present day

>>24683631 (OP)
bumpo

>>24683631 (OP)
Penthouse letters because they're real stories.

>>24692335
No doubt things like that happened, but enough to compare to modern-day hookup culture?
I'm going to need a source for that.

>>24693295
I've got church records from my ancestors going back 300 years and most of them had been recorded doing two things:
>making booze illegally
>fornication
And those were obviously just the ones who were caught doing. This is a history of 300 years of my own ancestors who were FUCKING out of wedlock (and making moonshine I guess?) with enough frequency and transparency for the whole congregation to know about it lol
I can't provide those records to you at this time just trust me bro

>>24693433
Evidence about your particular bloodline is anecdotal at best (your ancestors might have been more promiscuous than normal or have lived in an unusually "lax" part of the world) and of a sample size that isn't nearly large enough to draw any conclusion about the population at large.
If anything, it being a big enough deal to have it in the church records is more indicative of how out of the accepted ordinary it was compared to now, where premarital/extramarital sex happens pretty much in the open to the point where everyone who can have it does, and everyone who doesn't is automatically assumed to want it and not being able to have it.

Again, I'm not doubting that it happened, but to believe that it happened more than today, I need information about the population at large.

>>24693295
"hookup culture" is the same small population of sex addicts musical chair fucking each other with an occasional rebound tourist thrown in. Things are 100% more sexually sterile now than in the past

>>24695234
It's the opposite.
Virgins and non-sex-havers are tge small bubble you're part of as a 4chan user (even if you have sex), so it seems more normal to be celibate than it would to a normie.

>than in the past
In the recent past, sure.
Before modern times? No.

>>24696150
It’s actually not
Even for most normies it’s a desert out there. Often even for attractive women.

>>24696161
First Google result
https://ifstudies.org/blog/number-4-in-2021-more-faith-less-sex-why-are-so-many-unmarried-young-adults-not-having-sex
(all the other results paint the same picture but this is more comprehensive)
It's only a reduction relative to the past few decades, but it's still the majority at around 70% of never married young people (and that's just in the year of the lockdown).
Do you have a source for the number being that high in pre-modern times?

>>24696161
This is from a few days ago:
https://www.newsweek.com/americans-having-less-sex-birth-rate-decline-young-people-2122560
>Citing data from the GSS, they reported that from 2010 to 2024, the number of young adults who reported not having sex doubled from 12 to 24 percent
So it's still 75%

>46 percent of married men and women aged 18 to 64 have sex each week, compared to 34 percent of their unmarried peers
Among the unmarried (of which only a small percentage lives with a partner, as per the article), 34% has sex every week.

Again, please show me a source for it being this high in pre-modern times.

>What's your favorite erotic literature?

>...

>- Vgh, people vsed to have so mvch more sex than the do in this sterile modernity, we must retvrn~
>- Vgh, NO! People vsed to have so mvch LESS sex than the do in this debauched, we must retvrn~
Why are you motherfuckers like this?

>What's your favorite erotic literature?

>...

>- Vgh, people vsed to have so mvch more sex than the do in this sterile modernity, we mvst retvrn~
>- Vgh, NO! People vsed to have so mvch LESS sex than the do in this debavched modernity, we mvst retvrn~
Why are you motherfuckers like this?

>>24696289
If I see someone being wrong on the Internet I have to correct them or else I experience enough emotional pain and stress to shorten my lifespan by a week, which seems negligible but on 4chan it adds up insanely quickly.

>>24696303
>If I see someone being wrong on the Internet I have to correct them or else I experience enough emotional pain and stress to shorten my lifespan by a week
>on 4chan
Motherfucker how are you alive?

>>24696306
I just told you, I correct everyone always.
My day consists of waking up, opening a thread, argooing in it (even during eating or bathroom activities), then going to sleep.

>>24690123
Being shut ins and feminist freaks telling young men they’re essentially creepy, worthless and bad for talking to women. I’ll never forgive those weird witches for it.

>>24696289
We are simultaneously a slutty, hyper-sexualized culture. One that doesn’t have as much sex because a large portion of people are just turning to ez porn instead of dealing with the harsh landscape of modern dating and the labor that comes with any relationship. So much easier to tug it out to porn than deal with women who make a fuss about meeting out for a drink before you’ve given your entire life story and revealed all mysteries.

>>24696327
Our culture is one that doesn’t have as much coherent thoughts because a large portion of people are just turning to ez generalizations instead of dealing with the harsh landscape of learning and the labor that comes with any understanding. So much easier to simply anything until it fits into a tiktok and sounds snappy, than deal with sources, contradictions, intricacies and exceptions.

Fr fr tho our le culture does not have enough seggs because not enough of you faggots undertake the sacrosanct labor of fucking yourselves.

>>24696386
What you're saying is true, but it's not the main reason why our culture is so incoherent and inconsistent.
It's because most people base their worldview and decisions on some sort of ideology that is made up and has no basis in reality, so it's impossible to align the aspects of their lives that are deliberately constructed on top of their ideology vs those that are unavoidably based on practical reality.

Sade's 120 days of sodom

you guys need to learn to read

>>24696253
this is those who have not had sex in a whole year, showing that effectively a third of normies are literal incels

>>24696266
your own data shows two-thirds (66%) of those unmarried are sexless

Utwarumono, Nocturnal Illusion, or True Love 95

>>24696882
Weird choice of board for someone who can't read

>>24696253
>70% having sex at least once a year, 30% not even that
>>24696266
>66% of unmarried people do not have sex in a week
>54% of married people do not have sex in a week
Yeah that’s about what I’d expect.
So now what’s your basis that before the recent past this would have been insanely high?

>>24696972
>no u

>>24696882
>this is those who have not had sex in a whole year, showing that effectively a third of normies are literal incels
It's a third of never-married people under 35.
Meaning that about two thirds of the population is having premarital sex.

>your own data shows two-thirds (66%) of those unmarried are sexless
It only says that a third is having sex every week, and the rest are anything between a bit more than every week to never.
How the fuck are you extrapolating that if you're not having sex every week you're sexless?
This has to be bait (especially considering how you opened your post).

>>24697040
Until you can prove otherwise, I see no reason to think that in pre-modern times over a third of the unmarried population were having at least weekly sex (plus the vast majority of the rest having sex at least occasionally or having even lost their virginity, which today is the vast majority of people).