>>24717028
Schopenhauer's mathematical frameworks:
>High affinity to theoretical (think functions, calculus, number theory, graphing and other organizational spectra
>analytic > synthetic on geometry. Imo he was weak on geometry, but in his defense he also basically thought it was just something for organizing space
>highly intuitive, almost Lorentz like intuition, if you put a process in front of him he could probably solve it in his head before for he even realized it
His scientific interests are documented throughout his works, a modern schope who has had enough time with him has undoubtedly pursued a general scientific background and probably a specialty.
Schopenhauer also presented multiple methods for presenting these things so don't be surprised if you see him saying he felt it or things like that. He also defaulted to a highly simplistic knowledge extraction, if the idea doesn't produce pleasure or pain it's probably knowledge. Given his heuristics if a schope has had enough time he has probably corrected a number of his bad habits on this part and has had time to incubate new experiments. Sounds wierd, does work.
The Hegel question I'm not sure on, it could be a running inside joke, some posturing, and it might even be a totemic signaling system. If you get Hegel you may not even have to worry about it.
I should clarify a bit, when I say value judgement I mean whether Nietzsche is of the opinion the theoretical option in front of him is worthless. This is a long standing feud between Nietzsche and Descartes. It's also why Nietzsche struggles to avoid postmodern epistemic dilemmas.