← Home ← Back to /lit/

Thread 24732744

141 posts 14 images /lit/
Anonymous No.24732744 >>24732767 >>24732790 >>24732819 >>24732867 >>24732885 >>24732922 >>24732932 >>24733359 >>24733492 >>24733596 >>24733682 >>24733844 >>24734115 >>24734131 >>24734252 >>24735521 >>24735913 >>24736056 >>24736228 >>24736473 >>24736495 >>24737344 >>24737437 >>24737805
midwit indicators
I'll start

"ontological"
Anonymous No.24732753 >>24736461 >>24736820
"midwit"
Anonymous No.24732767 >>24732775 >>24732878 >>24732939 >>24733429 >>24733484 >>24733696 >>24734771 >>24735236 >>24736228 >>24736737 >>24737837
>>24732744 (OP)
being obsessed with categorizing and fitting things into charts
Anonymous No.24732771 >>24732774 >>24732780 >>24732793 >>24733590 >>24736451
I don't know what ontological means.

Does this mean I'm low IQ? It has something to do with why things are, I think.
Anonymous No.24732774
>>24732771
as opposed to why they aren't
Anonymous No.24732775
>>24732767
Spbp
Anonymous No.24732780 >>24732784 >>24732793
>>24732771
>I don't know what ontological means.
usually meaningless verbal filler used by midwits to sound smart. the /lit/ equivalent of valley girls saying "literally" all the time. it can usually be left out and if it can't there are many better ways to express the same thing.
Anonymous No.24732784 >>24732854
>>24732780
Cool, I'm gonna stay retarded and not look up the definition.
Anonymous No.24732790
>>24732744 (OP)
According to this chart i'm thirties, is it over for me?
Anonymous No.24732793 >>24732801 >>24734290
>>24732771
>>24732780
It’s similar to saying “inherently.” A person portraying an other as “ontologically” evil is a very specific description: it is not just an attribute, but a fundamental part of what they are.
Anonymous No.24732801 >>24732847 >>24732853 >>24733793
>>24732793
saying something is evil is the same thing as saying something is "inherently" or "ontologically" evil you fucking midwit
Anonymous No.24732804
High IQ = whiteness = contribution to capitalist surplus

Pure evil, I’m siding with the animals
Anonymous No.24732819
>>24732744 (OP)
dismissing the existence of bigfoot despite compelling evidence
Anonymous No.24732832
Idk if ramanujan was that smart, many people mention that he didnt have a formal education in mathematics, except he did, he went to college, but he failed every subject that wasnt related to math
Anonymous No.24732836
>many labor all life to formalise what the godspawn mention in passing
Anonymous No.24732840 >>24732844
On top of that, IQ is a bs metric made up by psychologists, it is not derived from anything observable in the brain
Anonymous No.24732841 >>24732851 >>24733786
Was Nietzsche a godspawn?
Anonymous No.24732844
>>24732840
i'll wait until i get my test results before i agree or disagree with you
Anonymous No.24732847 >>24732876
>>24732801
I could call your mother an nasty bitch. That doesn’t mean being nasty is a fundamental aspect to her, I’m just pointing out one attribute.

But if I called her ontologically fat, then she is inherently fat: being a landwhale is the core of who she is. It’s not something that can be shed away: her fatness is inseparable to who she is as a person. Learn what words mean you ESL faggot.
Anonymous No.24732851 >>24732858
>>24732841
neetch and jung, i can't tell which one i hate more. reading either will poison your intellect and sanity.
Anonymous No.24732853
>>24732801
What do you think inherently means? Why do you think that word exists?
Anonymous No.24732854
>>24732784
I've looked it up 50 times. It's not a complicated concept but the fact that its meaning never sticks in my mind implies it's relatively meaningless, it doesn't do any work.
Anonymous No.24732855
big mad cuz he cant hang
Anonymous No.24732858 >>24732861
>>24732851
Reading geneology of morals has made me a human being, but it's possible i'm kinda undereducated. What writers do you recommend?
Anonymous No.24732861 >>24732864
>>24732858
>Reading geneology of morals has made me a human being

Given that pathetic statement, I'd recommend you start with Saul of Tarsus.
Anonymous No.24732864
>>24732861
Lol, i was just raised in catholic family, sorry :( Please no more religion
Anonymous No.24732867 >>24732885 >>24734776
>>24732744 (OP)
This is a standard term in philosophy so this is very stupid.
Anonymous No.24732876 >>24732883
>>24732847
>her fatness is inseparable to who she is as a person
Anonymous No.24732878
>>24732767
Correct.
Anonymous No.24732883
>>24732876
OP’s mother is Ginny Sack. When she goes camping, the bears gotta hide THEIR food
Anonymous No.24732885 >>24734776
>>24732744 (OP)
This is a standard term in philosophy.
>>24732867
Oh..yeah this.
Anonymous No.24732922 >>24734875
>>24732744 (OP)
I work among researchers every day and every single one of them is in the 110-140 range.
"Godspawn" would be 140-160. Most IQ tests don't even exceed 160 and those which do are extremely unreliable because of how small the sample size is above that point.
Anonymous No.24732932 >>24733803 >>24734509 >>24735196 >>24736782 >>24737434 >>24737436 >>24737440 >>24737443 >>24737446 >>24737448
>>24732744 (OP)
words:
>dunning-kruger
>cognitive dissonance
>slippery slope
>ad hominem
>whataboutism
>AI
>crypto (-currency, not -logy/-graphy)
>here's why
>source?
>NPC
>bugman
>birth rates
>midwit
>brainlet
>chud
>incel
>foid
>IQ
>fascist(s) / fascism
>commie(s) / communis* / Marxis*
>JQ
>(Charlie) Kirk
>Bernie
>imagine if _____ did this
>debate
>wow
>yikes
>seethe
>booster
>diversity
>DEI
>pounce(d)
>dereliction
>[number] ways to ___
>our democracy / threat to democracy
>soience
>trust the science
>my own research
>misinformation / disinformation
>shill
>glowie
>russian bot
Anonymous No.24732939 >>24737837
>>24732767
thread should have ended here

it does for me, anyway, not reading the rest
Anonymous No.24733359 >>24733366 >>24733806
>>24732744 (OP)
>tfw 130 IQ sperg
How to avoid trooning out?
Anonymous No.24733366
>>24733359
if trooning out would make you happier then do it anon
Anonymous No.24733396 >>24733425
Retarded thread, first of all, most iq tests never get beyond 160, so youre a fucking retarded midwit for that.

But also, the higher iq you are, the stronger correlation with mental illness, its like you retards dont understand IQ, its the same with the opposite side of the IQ curve, its just that their mental illnesses are like disabilities rather than personality dysfunctions.

Your idea of what high IQ people are is a complete fabricated delusion.
Anonymous No.24733425 >>24733494
>>24733396
>the higher iq you are, the stronger correlation with mental illness
I wonder if back in the cavemen days they thought the same.

>us 60 IQ grugs normal
>100 IQ grug mentally ill
Anonymous No.24733429
>>24732767
As opposed to fitness dick in your mouth?
Anonymous No.24733484 >>24733808 >>24734771
>>24732767
>erm, actually everything is a spectrum, sweaty. like gender
this is the true midwit take
Anonymous No.24733492
>>24732744 (OP)
>"ontological"

Why? What's wrong with the word? Fuck you.
Anonymous No.24733494 >>24734226
>>24733425
Cavemen were higher iq than us. They simply chose to live with minimal technology after their Ted K. published his manifesto. Read The Immortal by Borges
Anonymous No.24733590
>>24732771
That NAFO le maymay saying ontologically evil which used it incorrectly really did damage

A better word to use is ontology, which has to do with how you perceive reality. Like the Ontology of a sodomite is either totally whacko or übermensch to ontologically prefer loose poopy shithole to nice tight pussy for sexual gratification
Anonymous No.24733596 >>24733668
>>24732744 (OP)
not 'ontological' but stuff like 'ontological evil', which is meaningless because 'evil' is a privation, and thus has no being in itself.
Anonymous No.24733668 >>24735891
>>24733596
yeah yeah yeah

raping a child is like... no palpable dark vibes here... just like a "privation" you see... dude's just "missing the mark"
Anonymous No.24733682 >>24735025
>>24732744 (OP)
"gifted kids" are almost always in the 110-130 midwit range and they were only "gifted" because they were in a class of retards
Anonymous No.24733696 >>24733800 >>24734771
>>24732767
Discrete categories exist. only the mentally impaired would dispute this.
Anonymous No.24733786
>>24732841
Nietzsche was in the thirties and Richard Wagner (PBUH) was a god spawn.
Anonymous No.24733793
>>24732801
I thought it had to do with being or some shit

if something is ontological it metaphysically exists or something

but non-essential qualities metaphysically exist according to a lot of philosophy niggas

so ontological as an adjective would seem to extend to non inherent shit too

that is to say ontological is over and above essential, its closer in meaning to existent

or so it seems to me
Anonymous No.24733800 >>24735724
>>24733696
do they exist ontologically or are they a spatial metaphor for our spatial-sensing monkey brains ? ? ?
Anonymous No.24733803
>>24732932
Based
Anonymous No.24733806
>>24733359
Just don't. I realized making myself into a woman would make me inferior so its not worth it.
Anonymous No.24733808
>>24733484
Funny because he never said that, midwit
Anonymous No.24733844 >>24734056
>>24732744 (OP)
Somewhat misleading, a 3-4 person group of of brainstorming 130s in a research setting will outperform the vast majority of 140-160s (high as it goes) going solo, whereas you could have a hundred 90-110s working round the clock and they'd never beat a mid-high 130.
There's some sort of floor boundary at the 120ish mark where you gain access to a sort of generative and intuitive thinking the double digits simply cannot do. Its not an exact thing but neither is IQ.
The fact that the boundary does exist as a rea, thing is the reason people "feel" IQ test are legit, instead of being one of thousands of dumb MBTI/OCEAN like psychology tests no one takes seriously.
Anonymous No.24734056
>>24733844
>source: my ass
Anonymous No.24734115
>>24732744 (OP)
Posting pretentious charts like this. Seriously, the fact that you saved this suggests that you consider yourself to be in the 140+ category. That's less than one in every 250 people. Do you really think that highly of your own intelligence? The maker of this chart probably clocks in around 110-120. Those who post it are probably even less.
Anonymous No.24734120
This thread is just OP coping about not knowing what ontological means
Anonymous No.24734131
>>24732744 (OP)
I'm the animal. I'm actually technically illiterate and have no idea how the hell I got here. I'm just drooling and smacking my hands all over the keyboard, and it's only by the grace of God that anything coherent comes out of itskfjskfjso;[kwpf[kw
ffkknzgrngagrw;gm
Anonymous No.24734226 >>24735712 >>24736464
>>24733494
I knew a guy once who would insist that cavemen had perfect recall and superior cognition that was lost when we settled down and started writing and farming. He would fly into a rage whenever anybody disagreed on this point. I think he must have been some colour of psychotic.
Anonymous No.24734252
>>24732744 (OP)
>midwit indicators
Trying to have intelligent discussion on a Mongolian basketweaving forum.
Anonymous No.24734290 >>24734776 >>24735144 >>24735188 >>24735833
>>24732793
You are so fucking dense it's unbelievable. Ontology is the backbone of modern metaphysics, yet you waltz in here and start describing only the pragmatics of the term as you gathered them form an internet basket-weaving forum. Yes, obviously it sounds retarded when you only read it from randos who give you points for having pretended to read. I am certain that is the only context you ever encountered the word in.

Why do you even post? Go discuss gatcha games or whatever the fuck degenerates do these days.
Anonymous No.24734509
>>24732932
>t. Godspawn level of fairness and recollection
I fucking kneel.
Anonymous No.24734674
>doesn't understand concept he uses everyday
This one hits close to home
Anonymous No.24734678
Kill yourself please
Anonymous No.24734771
>>24732767
Spbp

>>24733484
>>24733696
Cope
Anonymous No.24734776 >>24734810
>>24734290
>Ontology is the backbone of modern metaphysics
This is the only substantial thing in that entire response, and it’s already been iterated twice ITT, here:>>24732867 and here:>>24732885

How retarded are you, to spend an entire paragraph struggling to express something that two people already conveyed with just a single sentence? By the way, “backbone of metaphysics,” is meaningless when you clearly can’t elaborate further from that. You just sound like a Redditor smugly giggling about how “the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell.”

You’re a spiritual Redditor: the peak of intelligence for you will never eclipse basic rote memorization and parroting phrases.
Anonymous No.24734810 >>24734832
>>24734776
you are doing the same thing thoughbeit.
Anonymous No.24734832
>>24734810
You are doing the same thing.
Anonymous No.24734875 >>24735131
>>24732922
So is OP’s photo about them true?
Anonymous No.24735025
>>24733682
yeah that's what being a minority entails
Anonymous No.24735131 >>24737628
>>24734875
About the researchers?
For the most part yes if we're talking about shifting the IQ ranges all down by one category.
Those in the 110-130 group can still do research (most research is actually incredibly rote), are pretty normal for the most part, and only becomes trans maybe 1 in 10 or 1 in 20. Gifted kids, I don't know, I didn't know them as kids, and those that burned out at 15 didn't make it here so they are necessarily removed from my sample. Can't comment on those two.
I can't really talk on "godspawn". There's a lot of mythologising about these people, and a lot of their work is built so strongly on the work of people in the two groups below, but they have a charisma and an ability to pull it together, and if their idea benefits the right factions and they make the right story they will be idolised.
Maybe Euler and other really famous thinkers could think up revolutionary ideas in just 5 minutes, but I think it's unlikely, or more probable it is "simmering" over time based on their reading the work of their contempories and fusing it together.
Anonymous No.24735144 >>24735692
>>24734290
>Ontology
>pragmatics
>internet basket-weaving forum
>randos
>context
>degenerates
This thread is like the opposite of the thread the other day about how too much reading makes you sound pretentious to normal people.
Anonymous No.24735188
>>24734290
Why are you so mad? Hes not wrong.
Anonymous No.24735196 >>24735234 >>24735783 >>24735789
>>24732932
Whats wrong with ad hominem?
Anonymous No.24735234 >>24735546
>>24735196
If you say something shitty on 4chan and I call you a retard this ain’t as hominem
Anonymous No.24735236
>>24732767
the trvth svper nova that ended the thread
Anonymous No.24735335
the amount of seethe in this thread is glorious
Anonymous No.24735521
>>24732744 (OP)
giving a shit what your IQ is /thread
Anonymous No.24735546
>>24735234
it is
Anonymous No.24735692 >>24735699
>>24735144
You're on a LITERATURE board, CRETIN.
Fuck this place. It's gone to absolute shit.
Anonymous No.24735699 >>24735706
>>24735692
Um... cry about it?
Anonymous No.24735706 >>24735717
>>24735699
Whatever, cum, piss and swallow about it. Try not to drool over yourself tho.
Anonymous No.24735712
>>24734226
It's interesting, because we clearly do give away certain cognitive traits that less analytic primates have, like with the chimps being able to, at a glance, hold in their memory many more objects on a screen than humans, pressing at those things in order with ease. Recall without the ability to do much with those memories might be a heavy concession, but who knows?
Anonymous No.24735717
>>24735706
That's a good one you mind if i write that down for later use?
Anonymous No.24735724 >>24735728
>>24733800
erm...holy freaking crap...did i just discretely catagorize the manner by which the mind discretely catagorizes and it's relative correspondance to an ill defined real reality as opposed to a more metaphysical or metaphorical one...well. that just happened.
Anonymous No.24735728
>>24735724
excuse the horrid grammar im typing this shit out with my dick in hand
Anonymous No.24735783
>>24735196
>Whats wrong with ad hominem?
An ad hominem is a legitimate informal fallacy, but I think the point is that only midwits seem to go around naming this fallacy.
Anonymous No.24735789 >>24735799
>>24735196
you attack the man, not the argument. for example, telling serial killer that drinking bleach is ok because he said the opposite.
Anonymous No.24735799
>>24735789
It's a word list. The person saying "ad hominem" is the one being identified as the midwit (rightly, imo!), not the person actually engaging in ad hominem attacks.
Anonymous No.24735808
you can't save these hoes
Anonymous No.24735823
hyperbolizing
Anonymous No.24735833
>>24734290
>Ontology is the backbone of modern metaphysics
There's huge disagreement on what ontology even is. From the Wikipedia article (it links to good sources):

>Ontology is closely related to metaphysics but the exact relation of these two disciplines is disputed. A traditionally influential characterization asserts that ontology is a subdiscipline of metaphysics. According to this view, metaphysics is the study of various aspects of fundamental reality, whereas ontology restricts itself to the most general features of reality.[7] This view sees ontology as general metaphysics, which is to be distinguished from special metaphysics focused on more specific subject matters, like God, mind, and value.[8] A different conception understands ontology as a preliminary discipline that provides a complete inventory of reality while metaphysics examines the features and structure of the entities in this inventory.[9] Another conception says that metaphysics is about real being while ontology examines possible being or the concept of being.[10] It is not universally accepted that there is a clear boundary between metaphysics and ontology. Some philosophers use both terms as synonyms.[11]

I think that the word 'ontology' should be shit-canned and that the word 'ontological' should be shit-canned everywhere except in the phrase 'ontological argument' (where it has too much of an established use).
Anonymous No.24735891
>>24733668
I would think a child rapist's behavior is the result of a privation of a good upbringining, or proper regulation of neurotransmitters, etc.
Anonymous No.24735913
>>24732744 (OP)
>Diagnosed 136IQ
Not gonna refute the uncanny valley thing.
Anonymous No.24735941 >>24737201
Pic related: a good example of why 'cognitive dissonance' is a midwit indicator.
Anonymous No.24736056 >>24736058 >>24736323
>>24732744 (OP)
I was gifted as a kid but I´m pretty sure my iq has dropped since then. im shit at math.
Anonymous No.24736058 >>24736069
>>24736056
you aren't/weren't gifted.
Anonymous No.24736069
>>24736058
im definitely above average but maybe not 130. idk. I didn't give a shit about math and actively ignored it my whole time at school so maybe that's why im bad.
Anonymous No.24736108 >>24736127
they didn't start with the greeks
Anonymous No.24736127
>>24736108
to further the darmnation, they are monolingual!--in 21 century American!
Anonymous No.24736228
>>24732744 (OP)
IQ fetishism is faggy
>>24732767
Thank you for putting this fag in his place.
Anonymous No.24736242
>midwit faggot is too scared to say faggot
Anonymous No.24736323 >>24736414
>>24736056
Not to rain on your parade but I think a lot of people are “gifted kids” because adults, especially parents, are impressed by basic things and I think often underestimate how intelligent a child can actually be, and I also think that kids can appear much more intelligent than their peers at early ages and then everyone else just catches up or the gap closes significantly.
It’s also detrimental to overly praise a child for being smart and they tend to underperform due to learned laziness since they think being smart means everything will just always be easy and they learn poor study habits. I think this is why Asians do well in academics, their parents never praise them, perfection is the expectation. I remember in elementary school some Asian girl in started crying because she got an A-.
/stream of consciousness
Anonymous No.24736414 >>24736447
>>24736323
you understand you actually have to be tested to get into gifted right? as a child I scored at least 130 on an iq test.
Anonymous No.24736447
>>24736414
I understand that there is a quantifiable way to determine gifted status with validity and then there are people who self -assign based on how they perceive themselves or what their parents told them. Your post didn’t make it clear which one but I also went on my own tangent and drifted off the main point
Anonymous No.24736451
>>24732771
>Does this mean I'm low IQ?
No. I think it means something like the nature of something.
Anonymous No.24736461
>>24732753
>t. Educatable
Anonymous No.24736464
>>24734226
>cavemen had perfect recall and superior cognition that was lost when we settled down and started writing and farming
But he was totally right.
Anonymous No.24736473
>>24732744 (OP)
Epistemology.
Anonymous No.24736478
talking about iq
Anonymous No.24736495 >>24736504
>>24732744 (OP)
Being autistically good at math isn't intelligence. I'm tired of people equating raw logic with intelligence when in reality it's the farthest thing from it.
Anonymous No.24736504 >>24737289 >>24737922
>>24736495
Can you name some intelligent people with low IQ?
Anonymous No.24736737
>>24732767
Hence Aristotle is the ultimate midwit. This makes sense.
Anonymous No.24736752
>i read book and i am very smart
good for you guys
Anonymous No.24736782
>>24732932
Yikes, this was obviously written by a russian bot to threaten our democracy
Anonymous No.24736820
>>24732753
fpbp
Anonymous No.24737201
>>24735941
Scott Adams is unironically one of the biggest midwits around. Not only does he love to overuse freshman buzzwords -- he's also in the 21st century calling himself a trained hypnotist, apparently being unaware that the 'wowwwwww' factor of this died out with NLP and related cringe in the '70s.
Anonymous No.24737289 >>24737306
>>24736504
genghis khan
Anonymous No.24737306 >>24737314
>>24737289
High EQ, teehee
Anonymous No.24737314 >>24737321
>>24737306
he was illiterate
Anonymous No.24737321 >>24737429
>>24737314
IQ tests are designed to be cross cultural and don’t rely on words.
Someone who is illiterate could still take one as even without explicit instruction the task is intuitive
Anonymous No.24737344
>>24732744 (OP)
The combination of articulate writing and poor reading comprehension is a reliable midwit indicator. I encounter these losers almost daily, marveling at how people with such cultivated expression can fail to process simple quantitative qualifiers such as 'most' or 'many', how they misinterpret simple modal phrases such as 'not necessarily' as universal denial, etc.
Anonymous No.24737429 >>24737622
>>24737321
You don't know what you're talking about. Most people who take a formal IQ test will take the WAIS-5. Verbal comprehension is a huge part of it. You should look into it
Anonymous No.24737434 >>24737519
>>24732932
Quite frankly (as intensifier)
To be completely honest (as intensifer)
"Without hesitation"
Battle with [cancer, AIDS etc.]
In regards to (sic)
Content (sense in "content creator")
[Speaking] truth to power
Affect change (sic)
[media] Binge
The [consumer product or service] community
Lifestyle
Burnout (in the sense of "the state of feeling burned out")
Bikeshare/rideshare/officeshare/homeshare
"Begs the question" (sic) when in the sense of "prompts the question" or "invites the question"
Mindfulness
Partner (in the sense of "spouse," "boy/girlfriend")
Goodies
Treats
Deep dive
Democrat Party (sic)
tRump, 45, the current occupant of the White House, Traitor in Chief, God Emperor Trump, orange man (most euphemisms/"witticisms" relating to Trump irrespective of irony)
"That's cool, but did I ask?"
"Did I stutter?"
[arguing] In bad faith
Argument from/appeal to authority
Anecdotal evidence
Strawman
Slippery slope
Moving/shifting the goalposts
"Reality has a liberal bias"
"Internecine conflict"
"War of ideas/words"
Chunky
gin[ned] up
Chubby
Curvy
Entrepeneur
Sex[ual] predator
Indulge (sense of "indulge in chocolate")
Luxurious, succulent, decadent, sinful, devilish (applied to food)
Naughty
"Gotchya question"
Reverse psychology
Passive-agressive (sic) (when used in the sense of sarcastic, subtly rude, two-faced)
Projection/projecting
Wholesome
Fulsome
No-nonsense
Common sense
Conscious consumption
Ethical consumption
The consumer
Carbon footprint
Minimalist, stoic (as "lifestyles")
Aesthetic (in the sense of "pretty")
"Our/my philosophy of" (sic) -- walking dogs, cleaning toilets, selling Avon
Strongman
Grassroots campaign
Global village
The Global South
Globalist[s]
Antifa
Gig worker/gig economy
Information economy, knowledge economy
Guru, sage, wizard, shaman, wise man (in sense of "computer wizard")
Crony/stooge/henchman (post-Trump)
[Animal]-lover
[Animal]-whisperer
Man's man/ladies man
Gezundheit
"Shots in arms/jabs in arms"
"Get/got the jab"
Employer
Soulmate
Lover
Pop-up (mall, restaurant)
Blue Dog
Poop/pooping/pooped/poopy
Pee/peeing/peed
Restroom
TP
Grumpy
[bro/diet/rape/]-culture
S.O. [Significant other]
Abuser
Survivor (of things everyone survives)
Dummy
Dumbo
Assisted living facility, senior living facility (as opposed to nursing home, old folks' home, or retirement home)
Elder care
Essential workers
Front-line workers
Influencer
Corporate ambassador
"Mask up"
Dogwhistl[e/ing]
Anonymous No.24737436 >>24737519
>>24732932
The ___ space
Drill down [on]
Build out
Settler colonialism
[Black/white/brown] bodies/spaces/voices
Basis points
Whitepaper
Devs (developers)
Position
Long on/in [short on/in]
The __ trade
The __ play
Value investor
Shakeout
Weak/strong hands
Bullish on/bearish on (esp. when object doesn't pertain to the economy)
Corporate governance
Corporate responsibility
Not-for-profit
"Volcker moment"
Human infrastructure
Human capital
"Fact based policies"
Data-driven
Bloomberg (when metonomous of "Bloomberg terminal")
Queering
Problematize
Problematic (as noun and adjective)
Muni madness
Taper tantrum
"The future will run on [green, crypto, augmented reality, digital] rails"
Treasonous
J-Pow (Fed Chair Jay Powell)
Digital nomad
[Racial, political] reckoning
Equity (when there is no actual distinction made between that and "equality")
Othering, otherize
Intergenerational trauma
Sustainability
Greening
Energy transition
Thoughtcrime
Memoryhole[d]
Newspeak
Big Brother
"Some animals are more equal than others"
Diversity, equity and inclusion (as embedded phrase)
Metaverse (any play on "universe")
Internet of things
Web 3.0
Punching up/down
Centering (used figuratively)
Cyber (as shorthand for "cybersecurity," "cyberspace")
Fintech
DeFi
Siloed/in our silos
[get more] Granular
Emerging markets (as euphemism for "poor countries")
Latine/Latinx
AAPI
MENA
First Nations
Original Peoples
BAME
Visible minority
Undocumented people
Unsighted people (the blind)
Unhoused people
Radfem
[noun]-positive
[noun]-affirmitive
Gender affirmation
"Kids in cages"
"Crisis at the border"
Lifestyle creep
Sex worker
Urban, diverse, inner-city, vibrant (as euphemisms for black)
Radical [activity]
Islamofascism (dated)
Fourth industrial revolution
Stakeholder capitalism
[Noun]sphere
"Men who have sex with men" etc.
Stakeholder capitalism
"In contradistinction to"
"Despite, or perhaps even because of ..."
Paradigm (sic) (in the sense of plan or idea)
Urban renewal
"Build back better"
"Stronger together"
Ladyboy
"Russia, Russia, Russia"
"Donald lied. People died"
[Economic] contagion
Anonymous No.24737437
>>24732744 (OP)
>mfw 90 iq
Anonymous No.24737440 >>24737519
>>24732932
Muh ___
"Play stupid games, win stupid prizes"
"[We/you] love to see it”
Nothingburger
Bootlicker
Cope
Seethe
Dilate/dial 8
Desu
Senpai
Horny jail
Bonk
Bop
Boop
Snoot (snout)
Zoomies (dogs(?))
We stan
Tankie
Fash[y]
"Bash the fash"
-aboo (other than weaboo)
Bussy
Comrade
Rightoid/leftoid/femoid
Alpha/beta/gamma/sigma [male] (irrespective of irony)
Basedboy (grating rhyme; unpleasant to say or think -- "bugman" & even "numale" were better)
Chad, Stacy, Jamaal (as sexual archetypes)
Roastie
Wagie
Boba (breasts)
[Mommy] milkers
Booba
Gibs (welfare)
Gib ___ ("give me")
Brap/brapper/braphog
Tendies
Fren[s] (friend)
Human biodiversity
Rationalist
Skeptic
[Looks/face/height/wealth]maxxing
Neg[ging] (pick-up artist technique)
Kino (pick-up artist technique)
Sealioning (any minor TV Tropes "fallacy")
"Money-printer/___ go[es] brrr"
Smol (small)
"Eh, ..." (signalling what follows contradicts what it is responding to)
Cursed (in the sense of "cursed image")
Scissoring
Shlicking
Fap/fapping/fapper
Nofap
Sexy times
Sauce ("source")
Poast ("post")
[Noun/verb/adjective]mode (can be a noun phrase or compound; e.g., "boss mode, "epic mode" "monkmode," "godmode," "sicko mode")
"Made me blow air out of my nose" (or equivalent)
"As an engineer..."
"This. [So much this.]"
~ Rhetorical baby voice, mocking interlocutor: ("Waaaah I'm a wickle babby")
~ Rhetorical stutter, mocking interlocutor: ("B-b-but you can't just p-p-post proof!")
~ Rhetorical irregular case, mocking interlocutor: ("i GuESs nO OnE nEEdS ReDDiT GoLD")
~ Compound for-the-nonce insults: ("fucknugget," "pissbaby," "douchenozzle," "assturd")
Waifu (irrespective of irony)
~ Misspelled animal name; infantilized ("birb," "doge," "snek;" see "snoot," "zoomie[s]")
[Noun]bro (e.g., "dudebro," "gymbro")
Dudebro
That __-year-old -[oomer]
-[oomer]
Coomer
Doomer
Anonymous No.24737443 >>24737519
>>24732932
[afix]pilled (accepting a set of assumptions, an ideology, or becoming aware of a large, important truth (e.g., "blackpilled, "redpilled," "whitepilled," "greenpilled," "ironpilled"), often used ironically (e.g., "bogpilled"); exception is "bluepilled," meaning in the thrall of false assumptions, delusion
Subtweeting (when used figuratively)
Spoopy
*checks notes*
*teleports behind you*
"Rent free!"
"[Sometimes] it do be like that [tho]"
Smallfat/strongfat
"__ says trans rights"
"... but y'all ain't ready for that conversation"
"Instructions unclear; dick stuck in ceiling fan"
*unzips dick*
MAGApede/Ladypede
Cummies
Cunny
Jogger
Nog
Nig
Nignog
Chimp
Chimp-out
Merchant ("the happy merchant," "le happy merchant")
Le ___ face (e.g., le /pol/ face)
Le ___
kek
jej
zozzle
desu
baka
senpai
"My sides [are in orbit]"
Mog[ged/ging]
"The wall"
"APOLOGIZE"
Shitskin
"Praise kek"
[Rolling for] doubles/dubs
"Nice dubs"
"Dubs confirm"
"Nice digits"
"Nice get"
"Wasted digits"
"Wasted get"
Get/GET
Cumskin
Pajeet/[']jeet
Chimp
Chimp out
"Poo in loo"
"Oy vey ... [it's anudda Shoah]"
"Goy" [rhetorically adressing anon(s) as a Jew]
"Muh 6 million" (/pol/ canard; see "Muh," "Muh dick")
"Shut it down [the Goyim know"] (/pol/ canard)
Femmeboy (feminine boy or MtF transsexual; see "Trap")
Trap (preop MtF transsexual)
Boypussy/boipussy/boipucci (see "Bussy")
Hole ([pejorative] a woman; see "Roastie")
Kys (lit. "kill yourself")
Kawaii
"___ is [the] best girl"
Midwit
Plebe (instead of "pleb," short for "plebeian")
Patrician (occassionally shortened to "patrish" in adjective form)
Unironic[ally]
BBC
"Made for BBC"
Sissy hypno
Degeneracy
"Da Joos"
Incel
"Muh dick" (see "Muh")
"Das rite"
"Das it mane"
[Noun]free (e.g., "childfree")
Anonymous No.24737446 >>24737519
>>24732932
No[noun] (e.g., "nofap")
[Noun]cel (incel whose celibacy is purportedly caused or related to the affixed noun; e.g., a "currycel" is said to be celibate because he is Indian)
Glowie
Glow[s]
Glown*gger
"[adjective] hands typed this post"
Manlet
[affix]let ("chinlet," "brainlet," "manlet," "wristlet")
Paypig
~Short, obscene, description, usually of an attractive woman and often rhyming or alliterative, at the end of set phrase: "who is this ___?" (e.g., "semen demon," "sex pig," "chode road," "cum plum")
"Imagine the smell"]
Autist (autistic person)
"We wuz ___" (e.g., "we wuz kangz")
Hotep (see "We wuz")
Fpbp (first post best post)
/thread ("end thread;" in response to a comment so funny or complete that the thread has run its course by virtue of it)
/s (indicating sarcasm)
"On that ___ shit"
"Back on my/his/her ____ shit"
"It's giving ___"
"Say less"
"Hol up"
ur ("your")
u ("you")
Tho ("though")
Take the L (lit. "take the loss")
Take the dub/W (lit. "take the win")
Sus[sin]
Not gonna lie [ngl]
Cringe[y]
[hot/spicy/cold] Take
Salty
Thirsty
Fuckbuddy
Hubby
"The wife"
Preemie
Little people
Dick/pussy/[piece of] ass (as synechdoche; e.g., "get some dick," "get some ass," "good pussy")
Smash[ed]/slam[med] (had sex)
[affix]tard ("Libtard," "conservatard," "trumptard," "christard")
Happy trail
Ganja, kush, MJ, Mary Jane, chronic, bud, kinebud, herb, dope, that fire, that loud, that bomb (as alternatives to more standard "weed," "marijuana," "pot," "cannabis")
Ginormous
Thick (alt. "thicc")
"Dummy thick"
Senpai[alam] (family, more broadly "people," "folks")
[Noun]bod (e.g., "dadbod," "beachbod")
energy (e.g., "big dick energy")
"__ is life"
"__ was my childhood"
Hunk[y]
Haters
Insta
The [']Gram
Finsta
"Slid[e] into his/her DMs"
Side piece[chick/dick]
Butthurt
Dickrid[e/ing]
Dick[ed] down
[To] run a train on (several men having sex with a man/woman in immediate succession but not simultaneously)
Bad bitch
Boss bitch
Biddy
Girlboss
Gurl (girl)
Grll (girl)
Grill (girl)
Maxi (abbreviation of "maximalist")
[adjective]-ass (e.g., "stanky-ass," "raggedy-ass")
Fatbody (dated)
Anonymous No.24737448 >>24737519
>>24732932
Strongbody (dated)
Half-chub (weak or partial erection; "chub" presumably denotes a full erection)
Degen[erate]
Pregg[o/ers] (pregnant)
Happy pills ("I need my happy pills;" "Mommy needs her happy pills")
Crazy pills
Ticked off
T'd [ticked] off
P'd [pissed] off
Flicked [sic] off (flipped off)
Butt-naked [sic] (buck-naked)
Shit-eating grin (sic)
"Stay in your lane"
"Catch [these] hands"
Throw hands
Square up
Mickey D's
The Mouse (Disney)
On brand
"The fuck [tf]" (lit. "what the fuck?")
"Alexa, play ___"
Idiocracy
Whackjob/nutjob/nutcase/whackadoo
Cuckoo (crazy)
Bio[relative] (biological or blood relative; e.g., "biodad")
Narc[issist] (e.g., "narc mom," "narcmom," "nmom," "n-mom")
HODL ("hold on for dear life")
[Going] to the moon
Moon mission
Mooning
Diamond hands
Bestie[s]
"____ hits different at/when ____"
"____ just hits different..."
Prolly
"That's not even a thing"
"___ is a thing now"
"That's not how any of this works"
King ("you dropped this, king;" "black king")
[Racial, ethnic, national group] excellence (e.g., "black excellence;" "Denzel Washington is black excellence")
"I have the receipts" ("I have proof, documentation")
"Are y'all with the ___?"
"Why not both?"
lmao/lol/haha (used reflexively, as punctuation, or in a catty way)
[adjective]fat (e.g., "skinnyfat," "strongfat")
Titties
"This/___ slaps"
Low[/high]key
"For real though ... "
[The] pod (clique, social circle; also, podcast)
Adulting
"___ is ___ and I'm here for it"
Fuckboy (or "fuccboi;" see "Himbo")
Himbo
"Yikes" ("that's a major yikes;" "big yikes")
"[Big] oof"
"[This is] the way"
"It's a ___ from me ___" ("It's a yikes from me senpai" [sic]; "It's a no from me chief" [sic])
"All the things"
Toxic
Simp[ing]
"Read[ing] to filth" (?)
[De]platform[ing]
Bodysham[e/ing]
carrying water
die on that hill/hill to die on
cabal
Anonymous No.24737519
>>24737434
>>24737436
>>24737440
>>24737443
>>24737446
>>24737448
I use all of these unironically
Anonymous No.24737622 >>24737900
>>24737429
Verbal reasoning is a huge part of that specific IQ test but it is not a huge part of IQ tests in general, most of which do not test vocabulary or reading comprehension whatsoever, for example the one that MENSA uses.
Anonymous No.24737628
>>24735131
Well said. I think your assesment is correct.
Anonymous No.24737634
they care about science
Anonymous No.24737805
>>24732744 (OP)
>ramunajan
>automatically wins at life


>stupid to anyone smarter than him
yeah that's true for anyone

>80-90
>humble
Anonymous No.24737837
>>24732767
>>24732939
yep
Anonymous No.24737900 >>24737907 >>24737924
>>24737622
Mensa, the organization that certifies your brilliance for a small fee, accepts uncertified Raven's scores and SAT results from 30 years ago, yes. If we're talking actual IQ tests administered by people who are actually, at least in theory, certified to interpret the results, the WAIS is the standard, everywhere, and has been for years. Good evening, sir
Anonymous No.24737907
>>24737900
He's talking about one of those online IQ tests that show up in banner ads. The people who talk about IQ are, ironically, retarded without exception. I'm pretty sure most of them are jeets too because they'll always start boasting about how much bank they are making/are going to make with their STEM degree. Whites and even asians know that's crass, only the jeets do it.
Anonymous No.24737922 >>24737928
>>24736504
Probably most ancient people. Knowing what plants are safe to eat and when they ripen, how to hunt with just primitive weapons, knowing how to build everything needed for day-to-day life, etc requires an incredible amount of intelligence that doesn't translate to the ability to do abstract thinking measured by an IQ test.
Anonymous No.24737924
>>24737900
Ok that’s nice but they don’t test verbal reasoning on their test here
https://www.mensa.org/mensa-iq-challenge/
Anonymous No.24737928
>>24737922
Oh