>>24798879 (OP)
I would read it again. What's more interesting about it is that it was published more as a collection of his novel as it was mid-edit, combined with changes spurred by his notes. So if anything, it's like reading an autopsy of a work in progress. I liked that a whole lot. Some parts of it were sacrilegious and I didn't so much care for them, but if you want to be a writer it's worth looking at simply for the sake of seeing something in the throes of its creation.
