>>24814109
No. I'm saying don't give in to leeches saying they need help. They don't. This whole "I can't afford X" is code for making society shoulder scum that don't want to contribute. They don't need help in a first world country. No one should be coddled because It is not sustainable and it will crumble in the end. It is always more. More subsidies, more incentives. Everything will be a human right.
There are plenty of safety nets, even in the US.
A real problem would be the situation my doorman had back when i spent a year in Nicaragua. His wife had a permanent limp because she got shot in the leg at home during one of the weekly gang fights in her neighborhood and the only doctor in town, who they had to bribe, didn't thought her knee might need surgery. Not that there was anyone capable of operating her in the country anyway or if they sold everything they had they would be able to afford going somewhere with a professional competent enough.
Or back when i was sent to Botswana and the only street without open air sewage was where my hotel and embassies were located.
Those are real problems. They don't have any alternative. They would need additional external help or entire systems put in place.
First world "poors" don't have real problems because they are not even poor to begin with. You just have no perspective. Over here is not privation, this is trying the bare minimum.
>>24814135
Hi, retard. You are not making society better. You are making it worse. Rub your last two brain cells and try producing a spark. Humans act on incentives. What are you even doing. You are advocating for indolent leeches. You will only attract and produce more indolent leeches.
Try looking up how much north america already sinks into the "betterment of average person".
You want to shoulder a family of rats, fine, that's your prerogative. Don't make everyone else do it.
