← Home ← Back to /lit/

Thread 24815534

12 posts 4 images /lit/
Anonymous No.24815534 [Report] >>24815555 >>24816053 >>24816209 >>24817895 >>24817898 >>24818513
>refuted by aristotle
>refuted by longinus
>refuted by horace
why does anyone still take prosefaggotry seriously?
Anonymous No.24815555 [Report] >>24815560
>>24815534 (OP)
What did Longinus and Horace say?
Anonymous No.24815560 [Report] >>24815635 >>24816158
>>24815555
Longinus prioritizes noble thoughts and Horace devalues inventiveness
Anonymous No.24815635 [Report]
>>24815560
but that's just like their opinions man
Anonymous No.24816053 [Report]
>>24815534 (OP)
What exactly is prosefaggotry?
Anonymous No.24816158 [Report]
>>24815560
Why would devaluing inventiveness be be bad for prose but good for poetry?
Inventiveness is key to both?
Anonymous No.24816209 [Report]
>>24815534 (OP)
>Aristotle refuted Aristotle
Anonymous No.24817895 [Report]
>>24815534 (OP)

>Refuted by Aristotle
>Is a picture of Aristotle
Anonymous No.24817898 [Report] >>24817933
>>24815534 (OP)
Why should anyone care what this guy said? He never worked a real job in his life.
Anonymous No.24817933 [Report]
>>24817898
Plato said that only the Aristocrats should be the Philosophers because they do no hard labor and therefore have the energy to think deeply about things
Anonymous No.24818513 [Report] >>24818674
>>24815534 (OP)
If you're talking about Plato then the point is to extend the conversation beyond the page. Instead of saying some static thing, he poses a problem with multiple answers in dialogue thus inviting you to join in. If you take all his characters as his literal opinion then you're missing the whole point.
Anonymous No.24818674 [Report]
>>24818513
He's not talking about Plato, he's just doing a dull prose vs poetry thread. As a fellow lover of Plato, and as one who even agrees with your sensibility in reading him, try not to be over sensitive.