← Home ← Back to /lit/

Thread 24851866

38 posts 12 images /lit/
Anonymous No.24851866 [Report] >>24851985 >>24852039 >>24853080 >>24853110 >>24853253 >>24854500 >>24854640 >>24854893 >>24854987
Which Dostoevsky book do lesbians like the most?
Anonymous No.24851985 [Report] >>24852262 >>24852747 >>24853242
>>24851866 (OP)
I guarantee r/actuallesbians has an answer for you.
Anonymous No.24852039 [Report]
>>24851866 (OP)
God this is so hot
Anonymous No.24852262 [Report] >>24852336 >>24853052
>>24851985
I just googled and browsed that subreddit and my god what a depressing and wretched people "lesbians" are.
Anonymous No.24852329 [Report]
The same one everyone likes: C&P is leagues above the others.
Anonymous No.24852336 [Report] >>24852350 >>24852494 >>24856601
>>24852262
>erm... why is it pudgy middle aged butch women and not smexy japanese teens! this displeases penis-chan!
Anonymous No.24852340 [Report]
The Idiot if they are a sub
Notes From The Underground if they are a dom
Both of these come from personal experience so it might be biased
Woman hate each other, rightfully so given the way they treat each other, specially the ones considered low in their hierarchy
Anonymous No.24852350 [Report]
>>24852336
This but unironically
Anonymous No.24852438 [Report] >>24852453
The lesbian loli romance in Netochka Nezvanova remains the single hottest lesfic ever written. Too bad Dosto was camp'd before he could finish it and never bothered to complete the story.
Anonymous No.24852453 [Report] >>24852469
>>24852438
The what?
>Netochka is adopted by Prince X., an acquaintance of her stepfather, and chapters 4 and 5 are concerned with the orphaned girl's immersion in this unfamiliar aristocratic world, focusing particularly on her relationship with the Prince's daughter Katya. Netochka immediately falls in love with the beautiful Katya, but Katya is initially repelled by the strange newcomer, and is cruel and dismissive toward her. Over time, however, this apparent dislike transforms into an equally passionate reciprocation of Netochka's feelings. Their young, unashamed love leads to an intimacy that alarms Katya's mother, who eventually takes steps to ensure their separation. Katya's family move to Moscow, and Netochka is placed in the care of Katya's elder half-sister, Alexandra Mikhailovna. According to the narrator, Netochka and Katya will not see each other for another eight years, but as the novel remained unfinished, their reuniting is never described.
WTF. How have I not heard of this before?
Here's Tolstoy's shota crush from Childhood Boyhood Youth
Anonymous No.24852469 [Report] >>24852483
>>24852453
Yeah, imagine my surprise when I got a collection of short stories from a random sale and sat down to feel very smart and cultured in the company of the venerated old Russian master, and then HOLY SHIT page after page of loli snogging in bed. Damn, it was beautiful.
Anonymous No.24852483 [Report]
>>24852469
That's awesome. Thanks for making me aware of it anon. I'm definitely going to read it soon. You may enjoy Colette's Claudine novellas.
Anonymous No.24852494 [Report]
>>24852336
I actually know some lesbians and they're extremely bitchy. Must be the lack of hot beef injections making them that way.
Anonymous No.24852747 [Report]
>>24851985
>that post about getting divorced two weeks after marriage
Anonymous No.24853052 [Report]
>>24852262
Their being lesbians isn't the issue.
You are a part of the same wretched internet denizens.
Anonymous No.24853080 [Report]
>>24851866 (OP)
Why do you need Dostoyevsky when Chekhov is subtly too cruel for a women to read. While Dosto rubs the femme face in his gospel rigmarole in a futile attempt to exercise the demons within, the Chekhow just waits silently as they die off from terminal shame.
Anonymous No.24853110 [Report]
>>24851866 (OP)
stupid horny japanese high schoolers.
Anonymous No.24853242 [Report]
>>24851985
Didn't that board get infected by trannies?
Anonymous No.24853253 [Report]
>>24851866 (OP)
I always loved this gif
Anonymous No.24854500 [Report] >>24854824 >>24856160
>>24851866 (OP)
If you are alluding to Dostoevsky’s worst novels, then, indeed, I dislike intensely The Brothers Karamazov and the ghastly Crime and Punishment rigamarole. No, I do not object to soul-searching and self-revelation, but in those books the soul, and the sins, and the sentimentality, and the journalese, hardly warrant the tedious and muddled search. Dostoyevsky’s lack of taste, his monotonous dealings with persons suffering with pre-Freudian complexes, the way he has of wallowing in the tragic misadventures of human dignity – all this is difficult to admire. I do not like this trick his characters have of ”sinning their way to Jesus” or, as a Russian author, Ivan Bunin, put it more bluntly, ”spilling Jesus all over the place." Crime and Punishment’s plot did not seem as incredibly banal in 1866 when the book was written as it does now when noble prostitutes are apt to be received a little cynically by experienced readers. Dostoyevsky never really got over the influence which the European mystery novel and the sentimental novel made upon him. The sentimental influence implied that kind of conflict he liked—placing virtuous people in pathetic situations and then extracting from these situations the last ounce of pathos. Non-Russian readers do not realize two things: that not all Russians love Dostoevsky as much as Americans do, and that most of those Russians who do, venerate him as a mystic and not as an artist. He was a prophet, a claptrap journalist and a slapdash comedian. I admit that some of his scenes, some of his tremendous farcical rows are extraordinarily amusing. But his sensitive murderers and soulful prostitutes are not to be endured for one moment—by this reader anyway. Dostoyevsky seems to have been chosen by the destiny of Russian letters to become Russia’s greatest playwright, but he took the wrong turning and wrote novels.
Anonymous No.24854640 [Report] >>24854644
>>24851866 (OP)
GYATTTTTTTTTTTTTT

I love Dostoevsky's work.

I read Crime and Punishment in one sitting (it really vibed with me. I was a broke college kid at the time, albeit not a dropout, but I also had a family of all sisters who were away at home at the time. I also had thoughts of "messing up" people at the time, so basically Rodion was literally me)

I also loved Demons or "The possessed". Especially that "At Tikhon's" chapter where you see what Nic did.

I'm partway through Brothers Karamazov.

If a girl said Demons was her favorite, that would most certainly picque my curiosity
Anonymous No.24854644 [Report] >>24854666
>>24854640
>I read Crime and Punishment in one sitting
Is that actually possible? I haven't read it because of its length. Damn, I guess I (gaycel) have to kneel to lesbo chads.
Anonymous No.24854666 [Report]
>>24854644
I'm a straight guy, bro. I never said I was a girl. Lol
Anonymous No.24854824 [Report] >>24854843 >>24854884 >>24854979
>>24854500
Are you quoting something or did you just come up.with all of this on the spot? Goddamn. I wish i was this well-read and fancy...
Anonymous No.24854843 [Report]
>>24854824
he literally copy-pasted a nabokov quote lol
Anonymous No.24854884 [Report]
>>24854824
Newfag
Anonymous No.24854893 [Report] >>24854937 >>24859007
>>24851866 (OP)
If you like lesbians, you are 100% a tranny
Anonymous No.24854937 [Report] >>24859699
>>24854893
>enter my bedroom after a long day
>two hot girls kissing on my bed
>whoa what, how is this happening
>I linger on the doorstep for a second while they moan and deeply make out and grope each other
>they finally stop and both look at me
>"Oh hiiiiii", they say in unison
No way fag, as a straight man I will NOT unzip my dick
Anonymous No.24854979 [Report]
>>24854824
It is, as in all Dostoyevsky's novels, a rush and tumble of words with endless repetitions, mutterings aside, a verbal overflow which shocks the reader after, say, Lermontov's transparent and beautifully poised prose. Dostoyevsky as we know is a great seeker after truth, a genius of spiritual morbidity, but as we also know he is not a great writer in the sense Tolstoy, Pushkin and Chekhov are. And, I repeat, not because the world he creates is unreal -all the worlds of writers are unreal - but because it is created too hastily without any sense of that harmony and economy which the most irrational masterpiece is bound to comply with (in order to be a masterpiece). Indeed, in a sense Dostoyevsky is much too rational in his crude methods, and though his facts are but spiritual facts and his characters mere ideas in the likeness of people, their interplay and development are actuated by the mechanical methods of the earthbound and conventional novels of the late 18th and early 19th centuries.
Anonymous No.24854987 [Report] >>24855767
>>24851866 (OP)
these are 2 men
Anonymous No.24855767 [Report]
>>24854987
You wish
Anonymous No.24856160 [Report] >>24856330
>>24854500
i loved crime and punishment

the thought of roskonikov being like "am i am man of 1 in 100 millions?"
and realizing that he is no napoleon ultimately

i really liked that and thought it was a thought provoking book that i will remember for the rest of my life
Anonymous No.24856330 [Report]
>>24856160
It is questionable whether one can really discuss the aspects of ''realism'' or of ''human experience'' when considering an author whose gallery of characters consists almost exclusively of neurotics and lunatics. Besides all this, Dostoyevsky's characters have yet another remarkable feature: Throughout the book they do not develop as personalities. We get them all complete at the beginning of the tale, and so they remain without any considerable changes, although their surroundings may alter and the most extraordinary things may happen to them. In the case of Raskolnikov in ''Crime and Punishment,'' for instance, we see a man go from premeditated murder to the promise of an achievement of some kind of harmony with the outer world, but all this happens somehow from without: Innerly even Raskolnikov does not go through any true development of personality, and the other heroes of Dostoyevsky do even less so. The only thing that develops, vacillates, takes unexpected sharp turns, deviates completely to include new people and circumstances, is the plot. Let us always remember that basically Dostoyevsky is a writer of mystery stories where every character, once introduced to us, remains the same to the bitter end, complete with his special features and personal habits, and that they all are treated throughout the book they happen to be in like chessmen in a complicated chess problem. Being an intricate plotter, Dostoyevsky succeeds in holding the reader's attention; he builds up his climaxes and keeps up his suspenses with consummate mastery. But if you reread a book of his you have already read once so that you are familiar with the surprises and complications of the plot, you will at once realize that the suspense you experienced during the first reading is simply not there anymore. The misadventures of human dignity which form Dostoyevsky's favorite theme are as much allied to the farce as to the drama. In indulging his farcical side and being at the same time deprived of any real sense of humor, Dostoyevsky is sometimes dangerously near to sinking into garrulous and vulgar nonsense. (The relationship between a strong-willed hysterical old woman and a weak hysterical old man, the story of which occupies the first hundred pages of ''The Possessed,'' is tedious, being unreal.) The farcical intrigue which is mixed with tragedy is obviously a foreign importation; there is something second-rate French in the structure of his plots.
Anonymous No.24856601 [Report]
>>24852336
You read my mind!
Anonymous No.24857556 [Report] >>24859720
Crime and Punishment, obviously
Anonymous No.24859007 [Report]
>>24854893
Or I could be a woman
Anonymous No.24859699 [Report]
>>24854937
This is just an elaborate cuckold fetish.
Anonymous No.24859720 [Report]
>>24857556
ughh...