>>24854223 (OP)
I figured you would try. In a different book Adorno credits Nietzsche as an elite dialectician despite his explicit complaints about it. Nietzsche's high volatility throughout his works gives him entry to almost every topic. The issue Nietzsche always runs into is that he frequently can't relinquish his initial paradox, or he tries to put the entire issue in paradox at the start. For anyone reconstructing Nietzsche this means he didn't evade Descartes/Hume. The only way Nietzsche can end on Descartes is if he can verify he will be the last one, if he ends on Hume then there isn't a resolution. This is mostly a social reading of Nietzsche, no offense Adorno anon, it's actually a really good social reading on Nietzsche, especially for anyone who can recognize his dialectic potential. On the scientific side Nietzsche still has the same issue but the exception is that he doesn't have to verify whether he will go last, Nietzsche can always opt for Hume and perform a scientific demonstration at any point, he can also opt for Descartes but if he does then he doesn't need any particular entry or exit point and doesn't have to perform a true absolute. The also means Nietzsche can resolve on the scientific side.
>Fagcartes
>it's all homo
>always has been.
