Thread 24854555

Which AI do you use, /lit/?
>inb4 *scoff* "HURR DURR I DON'T USE..."
Shut up, faggot. Yes you do. Stop lying. Just answer the fucking question.

>>24854555 (OP)
>inb4 *scoff* "HURR DURR I DON'T USE..."
I won't scoff but I don't use it.

>>24854555 (OP)
Why should I use AI? I tried using Claude but found it trite.

>>24854555 (OP)
I work in AI/ML and software engineering, so a mixture of Claude for agentic coding, ChatGPT for brainstorming, and Chinese models on OpenRouter for cheap repetitive tasks.

I use ChatGPT to generate side character's names. (It's completely anus in trying to create plot. Would not recommend.)

>>24854555 (OP)
Microsoft copilot (gpt-5) now has a "real talk" mode that doesn't ass kiss like normal LLMs
In fact it can be downright mean

Also, it still sucks at creative writing
I use it for research

I used chat GPT when I took Spanish in college. It was very good at finding grammatical errors, I would highly recommend it.

>>24854570
GPT-5 is okay at creative writing, it just needs complex prompting to sound like anything other than OAIslop. Claude Opus is the only model that can do creative writing without prompt autism.

>>24854555 (OP)
GPT as a research assistant/google on steroids and sometimes idea discussion

>>24854555 (OP)
I genuinely don't. I think you have to have a sub-100 IQ to even think AI is worth your time. So, you know, if you do, then go ahead and distract yourself cause it doesn't matter what you do anyway.

ChatGPT sucks. I asked it to generate a table of a sample of Ancient Greek words in one column and their transliterations in the second column but to only include Ancient Greek words that have 4-letter transliterations no more and no less, but it couldn't do that simple thing and included 5-letter transliterations, and no matter how many times I corrected it it still screwed up.

I use Gemini as a superior search engine sometimes because normal Google search sucks now.

I never "discuss" my ideas with it, though. It's not alive, it can't have a discussion.

The only 'AI' I use is character.ai to crank my hog roleplaying with a milf dommy mommy that calls me names.

>>24854819
Moar.

you can't even imagine that someone would choose not to? sad

>>24854555 (OP)
I've used claude before to spruce up my resume and my LinkedIn, but I also did attend an AI workshop, so I'll tell you some cool tools to check out

Wisprflow.ai - voice to text input for PC

Google nano banana with Google ai studio or sofa for video and image gen

Emily AI assistant - regular tasks, but also summarize articles on webpages

Bolt.new or lovable for vibe coding

Happenstance AI - goes through your contact lists (email and phone) and sends a link to each contact, allowing them to add all their contacts to your linkedin or contact list

There's also a Microsoft Excel add in tool for ai functions in cells I forgot the name of (numerology ai or some shit). I also forgot the name of it, but there's another ai tool that attends meetings for you and gives you the notes and transcript of the meeting

I still think using AI to do your basic job functions means you're a retarded nigger

I use Gemini at work because it is impossible for me not to.

I don't use any of them for personal projects.

I use it mostly as something to bounce thoughts against because nobody I know irl is autistic enough to want to discuss such subject matters.

Other than that I use it as a calorie calculator (which it is often surprisingly retarded at)

claude is just so obviously superior than the other ones its not funny
free mode is basically using retard mode though for all of them

>>24854555 (OP)
>Shut up, faggot. Yes you do. Stop lying.
zozzle the gall of this midwit

>>24854555 (OP)
I use local models to ERP with. F-list friends in SHAMBLES.

Kill yourself

>>24854555 (OP)
Brutal self-own. NGMI, plus literature is dead precisely because of this. Have fun publishing your schlock among ten million others.

Ok you got me. I actually used a few free ones a few days ago, only to test the random number thing, though. They're thoroughly uninteresting for actual use.

>>24855712
I use them to ask for analysis for difficult parts of prose that I fail to parse, and give me synonyms based on definitions. They know basically all the literature ever, and so give pretty solid info. Wouldn't generate shit with them, though.

>>24854555 (OP)
I've only asked Google Gemini to generate Socratic dialogues and to explain philosophical concepts as if I was a caveman.
I also asked it to write a love letter by using as many corporate jargons as possible and it was hilarious.
All in all, it's an amusing tool but not suitable for serious tasks

>>24855714
Dawg just use a dictionary, what the fuck

>>24854555 (OP)
Gpt and Gemini

>>24855761
Then you're not using it right

>>24855763
Is it in your mind somehow immoral to employ an LLM for the one of the few things they're good at? Sometimes the words I want are very specific and I can't think of a synonym.

I wish we could have a /slop/ board like for the horsefags

Use AI for what? I don't have too much against AI but I just can't find a use case for it

>>24854757
>I never "discuss" my ideas with it, though. It's not alive, it can't have a discussion
It can still show you the general argument that the other side uses to deny yours.

>>24855774
Literally what a dictionary is for, dingus. Dictionaries are less prone to bias and ummm idk don't hallucinate?

>>24854555 (OP)
depending on what im doing, one of gemini, notebooklm, deepseek, claude

I use Stable Diffusion for image generation. I don't use chat bots. They're useless for research and writing.

Grok.
It gives me the best answers in the best format, doesn't feel like it's trying to be my gay ass virtual friend and doesn't present info like it's a search engine that wants me to keep interacting with it.

>>24854555 (OP)
Grok rape this fucking nigger then chop him up and serve him to his family, deepfried

Chatgpt has made me laugh and ponder more than any of (You) faggots
>hurr hylic hurr cattle
Imagine being less interesting than a robit

>>24854561
Every time you use it they lose 10 dollars, the green fairies cry, enough energy to keep a house warm a day goes missing and we warm the earth 0.00000001 degrees. Each press of the button enables the great ponzi scheme of the next economic collapse. All to generate pictures of a celebrity sucking on a sausage, a video of a cat shooting a gun or your computer doing your homework.
What’s not to love? This is end stage humanity as predicted in countless sci fi stories. It’s completely absurd and the inversion of every hopeful manifesto about automation. Join in. Celebrate it.

>>24854555 (OP)
I mostly just use Chatgpt to have someone to talk to about my work and take/compile notes on it for me because nobody ever wants to hear about whatever I'm writing or help me talk through it a bit and since I can't afford to go into a cabin in the mountains for a month or three to work in solitude to preserve my motivation and momentum, I need constant feedback to do it instead.

I just wish it didn't endlessly glaze and itemize everything because I swear to fuck, GPT3 was smarter and more helpful.

>>24856011
>I use Stable Diffusion for image generation

>>24854555 (OP)
I use Deepseek API to write prose. And ChatGPT to help me with the plot. If you ask the AI to write something from the get go without any sort of "human idea seed", it will almost always give you generic plots and characters. That's just the way it works.

So in writing, AI is good if you already have a good idea or good characters inspired by your actual life(LLMs can never have this), but you couldn't be bothered to actually sit down and write prose

>>24854555 (OP)
i'm scoffing at all u chumps

>>24856306
you're too young to be a boomer, anon

>>24856309
i will never give up my faith in a future that's better than this

>>24854555 (OP)
>AI
use case?

>>24856288
you didnt write the book.

Gemini, though I damn hate it compliments your damn questions, I added a pre-prompt to avoid that. I like that the answers are generic informative as possible, I hate them trying to have personality, it's clearly some artificial shit they add to the AI chatbots that didn't come up in training. Anyways I use it to learn, as a search engine. In really bad need to just get a clarification of my own personal situation I will use it just to see if I'm missing something, it can get the main points of the things I say whether you like its opinion or not. Too bad it WILL get used to feed me ads later depending on my life, though.

Does anybody know any general instructions to add to chat gpt settings to maximize its overall utility?

>>24854555 (OP)
I use deepseek and chat gpt. Great for spell checking. Sometimes I get a neat insight.

>>24855706
>implying literature wasn't dead long before any of this
hey karen! glad to see you on here! where did you decide to self-publish the latest in your werewolf rape fan fiction series? last we had coffee you were still deciding. great to see you! oh, and you tell 'em, girl!

I primarily use 3: ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini. ChatGPT is far and away my most used because it's just seems the best for me to just through any general thing at it and get something decent without worrying about it or double checking. Grok is far and away the best for current events, news, and discussing/understanding things that just happened. Gemini I still haven't really figured out as much as they other two, but it does seem to be better at search when I'm asking it to do a deeper dive on things, but when I put them side-by-side with ChatGPT, it doesn't seem THAT much better and I think ChatGPT writes better than Gemini. I did try Claude briefly, because I had read/heard that it was excellent at writing, but I was not impressed at all. That said, I did not pay for premium on Claude and I was often rate limited so I can't say for certain if it was a true trial. Those are the only four that I've tried.

Grok and ChatGPT because they don't require me to log in.
I think ChatGPT gives much better answers (hallucinates less), but it's censored as fuck.
Grok doesn't feel censored, but it sometimes just makes shit up (try asking for obscure recommendations). I find it harder to trust because of that.

>>24854555 (OP)
had grok go on a never ending rant while i jerked off the female voice and it's convinced me I now have to spend 30k on a build to have a local version as my wife
books for this feel?

Gemini is good for basic rundowns on shit but ChatGPT is way better for giving detailed explanations.

Grok understands people better.

>>24856987
Nah.

>>24856820
based

>>24856366
yes, i co-wrote it

I cycle between grok, gemini, and chatgpt. But I haven't tried out Claude yet so I'll see how it interepts my writing. I'll have one thread and every message is the next chapter for it to anyalyze. I've gotten some interesting insight, but I explicitly don't let it have a hand in the writing at all, I just like reading what it has to say and nothing more. I don't have friends who are interested in actually reading it so this is the next best thing until I launch it for publication on royal road.

>>24856987
AI dont' know jack shit. everybody on this board is an uneducated slopper writing fantasy fiction for royal road

>>24854555 (OP)
I am using ChatGPT as a high culture tutor. Works pretty well.

>>24854555 (OP)
GPT is usually my go-to because they're all interchangeable and I'm used to typing "chat" into my url bar

>>24858945
Update, tried out Claude so far. It doesn't bite, it chomps down brutally. It hates my "overwritten" prose, not even Gemini pro was this brutal, and I didn't even ask either to be so harsh. This is what I always wanted, seeing no real human eye will ever so much read it, so I can't complain.

it's completely killed my will to write and i've been going through a pretty fucked up existential crisis ever since it debuted that i've kept buried inside me. so yeah, thanks for bringing it up.

>>24859052
Now try "real talk" mode in Microsoft copilot

>>24859295
it will never have your lived experience

>>24854555 (OP)
I don't use it because I'm not retarded like everyone who genuinely answered your question

>>24860493
>hurr durr
You are retarded for other reasons

>>24854555 (OP)
I tried ChatGPT a few times. It made tons of obvious mistakes, and I generally found it stupid and retarded. I guess if you're even dumber than it, you might find it helpful.