>>24858401
It's not just that, but so many names are dumped in the beginning. At least in War & Peace, they give you a chart at the beginning of the book.
>>24858389 (OP)
This one you can skip. It can't decide whether it wants to be a confucian or a taoist text and it is not nearly exotic enough to warrant getting through the hundreds upon hundreds of pages of just women bickering
And what about this? I've had my phases with Three Kingdoms and Wukong outside their respective books, but I know nothing about Margin and Red Mansions.
>>24858816
I read an unabridged English translation of The Water Margin (aka Outlaws of the Marsh) and I think it's terrific. It's grittier and more down to earth than Three Kingdoms: it's about criminals and bandits and clashes with the state and stuff, but with a huge variety of genre. Like Three Kingdoms, it moves really fast, it's very direct, and there are a million characters.
>>24858389 (OP)
I made it through the major classics of Britain, America, Germany, France, Japan, Korea, much of the Native American lore, and a good chunk of the Roman classical. I went through War and Peace as a teenager.
I still couldn't force myself to finish the Chinese classics. They're just so tedious and boring and pretentious.
>>24858891
I wouldn't know, my guess would have been that communism would have gave then coherence or an entirely new kind of neurosis, but I know nothing about modern China and have only read those three bodies novels form modern times and they were awful
Anyway it representing China ethos would make the country a mess, and not make the novel any better
>>24858389 (OP)
Yes. It's possibly the greatest novel of all time. It isn't any harder to read than other doorstoppers with a massive cast of names. Jot them down and you'll breeze through it in its entirety.