← Home ← Back to /lit/

Thread 24861157

10 posts 6 images /lit/
Anonymous No.24861157 [Report] >>24861174 >>24862168 >>24862226 >>24862705
Socratic method
>Bother every rando on the street with obvious questions to stroke your own ego. Call everyone you disagree with a sophist. Have your bitch boy scribble all that yapping down.
Heraclitic method
>The average person is retarded and you shouldn't bother. Write arcane passages with sophisticated wordplay just to entertain yourself. Leave nothing behind.
Anonymous No.24861174 [Report] >>24861182
>>24861157 (OP)
hey man, you go through enough and you live both experiences. its all about finding those brief moments of balance, where conflict turns to peace, however fickle they are.
Anonymous No.24861182 [Report]
>>24861174
>t. Aristotle if he were a hippie faggot
Anonymous No.24861205 [Report] >>24862163
Socratic method
>you really didn't think this through huh kid? you just download opinions from your favorite streamer in the Agora
Heraclitic method
see left
Anonymous No.24862163 [Report] >>24862171
>>24861205
>see left
who?
Anonymous No.24862168 [Report] >>24862849
>>24861157 (OP)
Heraclitus only didnt leave anything behind because it all got destroyed. Wasn't his intent.
I agree Socrates was a fucken n00b.
The man you are looking for was named Diogenes.
Anonymous No.24862171 [Report]
>>24862163
Thats Carlito Junguttirez, second rank commander during the Mexican War. Shot over 70 men himself, and was known as "The Mad Cabalero" throughout the war.
Anonymous No.24862226 [Report]
>>24861157 (OP)
t. butthurt sophist
Anonymous No.24862705 [Report]
>>24861157 (OP)
The Socratic method should be fake and gay, but I've learned that virtually no one holding contemporary beliefs can defend them worth a shit. They rehearse arguments and memorize statistics but if you go even two steps off the trail and ask them to explain the basic assumptions that inform their interpretations they sperg out and can't justify anything because they've never thought about it. They rely on consensus so much that they honestly think not immediately conceding to their assertions is evasive or bad faith.
>Here's eight pages of statistics about doing thing.
>But how do you know doing thing is good?
>Because it results in stuff.
>But what makes stuff good?
>[Engage I AM SILLY Mode]
Anonymous No.24862849 [Report]
>>24862168
He only ever wrote one manuscript according to later sources.