New trailer - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_U00rh2G3o
Dev interview - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kNPeRhnM6Y
Seems you'll be able to turn yourself into an even greater abomination than last time.
Also still don't know about accessing the old style arsenals (heavy armor in the menu), but it's funny to see one in the trailer just snatch one of the powersuits in midair.

Also this is priced, at least on Steam, at 70 dollars.

Yes, Seventy Dollars.

>>23309575
Welcome to the future. That number is never going back down again, and the most premium of games will be charging $80 at launch. Maybe they're all hoping to get a few more bucks on the inevitable 50% off sale a year in.

Anyway, looks like the plot will be nonsense again. Also actual mechs are back, just after people came around to the idea of this being a better Anthem.

>proper mecha properly confirmed
>partial suits are canon
>outer augmentation supposedly replaced with mutation?
Pretty cool, but
>lock-on "aiming" in a TPS, lockbox for missiles only
Absolutely disgusting. There's a ロックオン距離 stat on heads so it's not entirely braindead, but something tells me there won't be a way to replace it with a constant lockbox nor a good reason to go full manual.

>>23309568 (OP)
Official site updated.
Shows off customization, including becoming an abomination. https://na.daemonxmachina.com/titanicscion/gameplay.html
Also a lot of character info - https://na.daemonxmachina.com/titanicscion/characters.html
And a small update on the story.

>>23309575
That's normal now. GTA6 will probably be the first $100 game and it'll become the new standard.

>>23310390
I'm going full human again. There better be a story payoff for doing so, I'm still dumbfounded it never mattered in the first game.

>>23310452
I was going to call you a coward, but these mutations look like shit.

>Arsenaals are now power armors
>But you can also still use a proper bigass arsenal apparently
So we sum kind of machine robo and shieeeeet this time around?
Those mutations look godawful, hopefully some of those can turn use into a Guyver type monstrosity but even there what's the point when you'll never see them due to the Arsenal suit.

They really needed an art director, every design in the game looks atrocious. I'm not playing a game where nothing looks cool.

>>23310546
I think the default colour scheme and the heavy greebling doesn't work well, but the customisation trailer has at least one thing that looks cool. Would probably swap out the helmet though.

>>23310546

>>23309568 (OP)
BRING BACK THE ICE CREAM SONG YOU FUCKING COWARDS

>>23310600
I hope those cowards will give me actual monoeyes this time around, fuck visorfags

>>23309630
You can see footage before they all get in the warthog where he's manually aiming his rifle. It's probably just an option like the first game.

>>23309630
Just copying armored souls 6
This whole industry is creatively bankrupt

I like the robots a lot but the characters don't look too distinctive yet. I hope I can make Cosmo in the character creation again.

Hex? More like sex(o).

>>23310625
fuck you, visor supremacy
mono eyes are fucking gay

>>23310861
>V*sorfags

>>23310764
At least pretend you actually played AC6 bitch

>>23310953
Right, AC6 is even worse in that it aims for you at all times without even having to hardlock, and for missiles too.

>>23310608
The ice cream shop itself is confirmed if nothing else.
https://x.com/dxm_info/status/1930565532807479459

We finally gatling guns and proper funnels this time around

also it's reddit has gone fucking retarded

>>23311310
Wish they'd stop hiding the... mecha mechanics as if it's not a selling point. The model(?) here appears to be the same as the one at 01:00 and 00:15, but picrel (01:12) is clearly a different one. What's strange is that they all use the same shoulder cannons(?) that seem to come with auxiliary boosters, which at first made me think they're model-specific and can't be changed, possibly suggesting that "heavy armor"s come prebuilt sans weapons, but maybe they're separate and really do just come with aux boosters that may or may not affect performance because why not.
Still can't say for sure that actual body parts can be switched out, and why everyone uses the same shoulder part I have no idea. Though I think it's at least safe to assume that the "back" part, if still customizable, is now shoulder-mounted to give the secondary arm weapons like those gatlings more space. Probably shouldn't get my hopes for two separate shoulder slots with some parts that take up both, but it'd be nice.

tldr: autism

Where are you seeing proper funnels? Didn't the first game already have that? They just sucked.

>>23310657
Looks like there's some standard controller aim-assist going on in that segment as well. But again, while it's clear that manual aim will be an option still, and the hard lock doesn't seem to have a predictive secondary lock, I imagine trying to aim manually at close range against fast opponents will be almost entirely pointless.
The lock-on processor in the first one may not have been very well balanced, but they tried. You weren't supposed to use it. Not so much here. Also processors are gone.

>>23311467
>complains about hard lock
>complains it'll be too hard to shoot things without it
Nigga what do you want?

>>23311485
If the game is designed around a hard lock, quickboosting enemy arsenals won't care that I have autism and don't want to use it. Go fire up AC4A and play with FCS disabled (L3 hold), see how that works out.
>what do you want?
A game where I don't have to build my entire playstyle around trying to aim manually. More specifically: the lockbox system the first game already had. If you could read you'd already see that in the first post.

>>23311442
There were funnels in the first one yeah. iirc, only the boss ones were decent.

>>23311514
You're making sweeping assumptions for the worst possible scenario even if they do give you what you want, which is exactly what the first game already did.
I think you're just having a big cry.

Also AC4A has a softlock. You don't get turned to face your enemy if they fly off, it breaks instead. It's soft.

>>23311558
I mentioned AC4A as an extreme example of going against a fast-paced game's intended targeting method, its soft-hard-lock isn't even relevant. Why do I have to spell everything out these days?

Even if we assume that the hardlock is feasibly ignorable, it still sucks that you have to ignore a mechanic that replaced one that worked just fine before if you want to actually aim in your shooter. Even Anthem didn't have that issue, although yes, I do realize it wasn't really the same type of game.
I'll be surprised if the game is playable without compromises in manual with hardlock just being there for consolefags - especially when there actually is a head stat tied to it. Sure, I'll "wait and see" and probably still play it even if I'm not proven wrong, but I don't like the implications of what I can already see now.

>>23311612
Maybe you could instead use clearer, more direct points. You could rephrase all this instead as "wah wah it's probably awful it's all over dxmbros they're probably definitely not just doing the same shit they did in the first game where it was just fine"

>game offers you a variety of options
>logically, some will be better than others
>instead of improving your playstyle to keep using the style you want, you just use the "strongest" (AKA easiest) option and complain about it
It's like I'm really on /v/.

>>23311617
They are quite literally and very obviously not doing the same shit they did in the first game. See, I tried to tone it down and find common ground, but you're still being fucking retarded.
There is an issue, it just may be not as big of an issue as it seems. Either way it fucking sucks. I'm not going to act like some fucking redditor who will only ever downplay and quietly voice any concerns because he doesn't even really care. If something really sucks, I'll say it really sucks. Did I say it'll irredeemably ruin the entire game? I did not.
>>23311619
Kill yourself.

>>23311629
I can look at the manual aim footage and it's exactly the same as the first game, so if you wanna keep crying at least do it more quietly.

>>23311631
Are you just fucking with me?
First game had lockboxes as the primary aiming method with a situational manual aim toggle. It DID also have a processor that gave you hardlock but gimped your memory. It WAS actually busted and worth using if you hated fun, but it wasn't intended.
TS appears to have a hardlock as the primary aiming method that is directly tied to at least one stat. There is no processor slot and no apparent downside to hardlocking. It may be safe to assume that the lock range stat means you'll always have to aim manually past that range. So far, the only lockbox that's been shown is one that only pops up when targeting missiles only. It does ignore hardlock.

Sure I guess they're similar in that you fire a gun and hit something.

>>23311662
>appears
>may be safe to assume
Some dudes don't even realize they're doing this to themselves.

>>23311678
Should I mail you a bomb or a guide to reading comprehension? You say it looks the same, it does not look the same. To claim it's the same just because we don't yet know everything about the game is to make shit up and assume it to be true. There's no basis.

>>23311691
I intuited it will be about the same.

>>23311519
none of the drone weapons were good. they had that retarded pathfinding issue, and cost too much memory for fragile they were. an NPC with blitz are useless/easy since they did piss damage.
And yeah it's like all arsenals(mech) have built in hermes boosters

>>23311442
I think the power armor thingy is just a bait and switch, they will be as barebones as they can while the mecha have all of the fun stuff.

The new trailer literally had the Heavy Armor/Classic Arsenals. Are people blind?

>>23309575
>>23310403
Tbf, my parents paid like 100 bucks in the 90s when I wanted a game. That's like 200 dollars now.
Probably why I got so few.

>>23311884
>blind
No, but if you haven't noticed people like to be outraged so they'll imagine something to be angry about.

>>23311884
Are those blind people in the room with us right now?

>>23310625
Visors are justice, faggot.

New screencaps including jet mode for the heavy armor - https://jp.daemonxmachina.com/titanicscion/gallery/

>>23315802
We XBX now. I still don't get what the fuck is with these booster-cannons. I guess the jet mode confirms you can't actually customize the HAs, but those things look too tacked-on to not be something you can swap out.

Oh there's apparently already plenty of raw gameplay in chink runes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFTDXf5NPFY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urt0LSy8chM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-G4yW-8TSCg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHG00E7MAyA

>>23315802
This looks cool

>>23315802
>>23315820
It's concerning arsenals are now stuck in their set form.

Uh Doll Nest Sisters?

Kinda sucks were stuck with the big fuck off boosters cannons

>>23315913
those were in the first game

>>23315911
Now if only body customization wasn't so limited. I'll take what I can get when it comes to mechagirls, but they could've done a bit better here.

>>23315926
they were an optional part. Not perma bolted in like now.

>>23315841
Gameplay vids got me more interested
I'll give this one a shot

New vid about mutilating yourself - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke2YFsiAEqM

>>23316901
I look like this btw

>>23317173
>>23316901

>>23317173
Better than the first example they showed, weird proportions are definitely a plus.

>>23315802
I think its another scrapped idea of Old Gen Armored Cores.

>>23321697
Is it just a wild guess, or is there an actual reason to assume that?

>>23321749
This thread is just assumptions out of some retard's ass.

>>23325224
You must be new to DXM threads if you haven't experienced the wild ass assumptions people have made about the prior game.

New character trailer, this one's for the Reclaimers faction - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=717iJwffMlI

chuuni edgelords https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffRxvmBT71s

A bunch of new info including a card game - https://www.rpgsite.net/preview/17670-daemon-x-machina-titanic-scion-new-features-preview

>>23325477
>the wild ass assumptions people have made about the prior game
Do tell

>>23315802

This looks interesting.
Not $80 interesting but still.

>>23331340
Oh you never heard about the "clearly this game had branching routes that got cut at the last second because Armored Core would have had branching routes" one?

>>23309568 (OP)
slutty waists for male AND female character, nice

>>23311884
i hope they play an actual significant role and aren't like 20% of the options

>>23317173
gothicmade looking ass

Some new footage - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS6F70gTnas

>>23341138
huh