Does anyone else love images like this? Pilot girls in peril?

This has just been a fetish for me as long as I can remember. For some reason, this scenario is just amazing to me. A cute girl in a cockpit - a dangerous cockpit. It's such a scary and unforgiving situation - one wrong move and her life is over. She cries for her mother, worried and afraid, her bravado just hours earlier - as she had giggled, crawling into her cockpit in her skin-tight pilot suit and wiggling her cute butt as she reached the top of the ladder - completely gone.

If a missile hits the cockpit, she knows it's over. She'll only have minutes to survive until she's consumed by an agonizingly hot fireball melting her to death.

That regret. The IMMENSE regret. The wondering why the hell she even got in this cockpit to begin with when she could have had a life of being cute. She almost wishes the missile had been a direct hit, killing her instantly, but she got no such mercy. As her black-box feed is picked up by the enemy mechs and they watch her final moments, they watch the pathetic young girl scream in agony in her final seconds before being engulfed in flame.

Don't post AIslop

You are not asking for something common. Pilots are usually depicted with a determined look in their eyes. You can probably find what you are looking for with AI pictures , if you can stand them.

Or maybe some artist who has the same fetish as you, which I've often seen end up in gore, quite a big no for me.

>>23372614 (OP)
Kill yourself

>>23372717
>>23372705
What's wrong with AI art?

>>23372744
I really don't care, but it often makes people go apeshit.

>>23372754
Yeah, why is that exactly? You can get thousands of images/niche ecchi porn of anything you want. Uncensored/unlimited if you run local or use NovelAI. Who wouldn't like that?

>>23372744
Well for one thing it's really unprofessional to insist that you've made art when the anatomy on display suggests that the not even completely drawn passenger car seatbelt of a cockpit harness is slicing the subject's boob from beneath, disappearing from existence beyond that.

Look I get it, I spank my meat to stuff that is incredibly subpar from a technical standpoint, but even the most amateur deviantart scribble follows through on detailing and doesn't hallucinate half of a belt strap like that.

>>23372874
I shrug at you, sir.

First of all, I don't claim to have 'made art', especially not in the same capacity as a real artist. I'm not that stupid. I generated an artpiece.

Second of all, tiny mistakes like that? They really don't mean much to me. But if I did notice it? I could fix it easily. The mistake you made is easily fixed with inpainting - if I had noticed it and it bothered me.

So you're looking at a max of 5 minutes of effort per image if you're REALLY anal.

Meanwhile, that "scribbling deviantart user" is going to take a fuckload of time to draw the art. You can generate HUNDREDS of pictures in that time.

It's just more content. I don't claim to be an artist - being a real artist is super impressive.

But this shit is awesome. Its an unlimited source of everything you could possibly want, forever.

>>23372883
So basically you're just admitting you have no standards? Good for you I guess. I myself have no interest in AI-generated anything. The novelty wore off yeaes ago for me and nowadays every gen looks exactly the fucking same to me. Doesn't matter if it's realistic or not, it all has this awful plasticy sheen to it that reminds me of really bad Blender porn. And if I wanted to make my own porn I'd rather learn to draw it because under no circumstances will I pay for spankbank material. But ultimately I don't give a shit if you do as long as you're not trying to evangelize AI like a Mormon missionary.

>>23372883
You're an idiot

>>23372908
nta, but you really haven't seen any AI art in the past year or so if you think it "all looks the same". You can do any artstyle you can imagine now with AI.

This is my main issue with people hating on AI. You can hate it if you want, but stop hating the version of AI imagegen we had back like 2 years ago. You need to accept that it's gotten way, way better and more competent. Just tag any artist in the prompt and watch it make magic.

OP has the right idea. Stop being so fucking pessimistic. Getting unlimited free porn is absolutely worth it.

>>23372933
Idiot

>>23372917
>>23372934
Why am I an idiot? lmfao

>>23372933
Nice pic bro, gotta love stuffing random-ass characters into pilot suits. Now show her screaming in fear ;P

>>23372908
I mean, I absolutely do feel like I should "evangelize" it if you genuinely believe AI art is "low quality" and that's the main issue with it. There are moral issues with it, sure, but to say its "low quality"? TF outta. Learn to make informed decisions

>>23372933
>>23372908
Same prompt, different "artist". Still think it "all looks the same"?

>>23372614 (OP)
>>23372936
When are morons like you going to learn to keep the AI excrement on their containment boards?

>but to say its "low quality"?
If you can tell it's slop from just the thumbnail and the hideous filters those algorithms use, then it is low-quality.

>>23372942
No consistency whatsoever in the style, nonsense "text", missing fingers in right hand, hypersaturated coloring that gives it away as slop.
The fact that you fail to understand why this looks like shit is the saddest part of all.

>>23372936
>Why am I an idiot?
Because you need to ask.

>>23372951
I dunno. I wouldn't say it looks "like shit". It's got some goofy AI issues like broken text and some fingers. The overall quality is still very goon-able. I also like how you didn't address >>23372933 , the clearly better looking image.

I didn't really care for AI art either, but I can't lie and say that first Choco pic doesn't look good. Don't kid yourself man. I probably won't ever use it either, but why do you care if this guy uses it to goon? Looks perfectly acceptable to me.

my my my, this board is full of autistics. Instead of talking about pointless things help the poor fagot with his super niche Fetish.

>>23372962
>I wouldn't say it looks "like shit".
>It's got some goofy AI issues like broken text and some fingers.
That's precisely why it looks like shit.

>I also like how you didn't address >>23372933 , the clearly better looking image.
Inconsistent background, nonsensical elements everywhere, pilot chair makes no sense in regards to the body.
When you look at slop outputs, you start to appreciate even the most mediocre artists. There's effort there, logic rather than a hyperpolished mathematical average.

> but I can't lie and say that first Choco pic doesn't look good. Don't kid yourself man.
I'm not kidding myself. Slop looks and feels uncanny.

>The overall quality is still very goon-able
>but why do you care if this guy uses it to goon?
Oh, that explains it, then. Why don't you head to >>>/trash/ and leave us alone, then?

>>23372976
>help the poor fagot

>>23372976
Yes, sir!

>>23372936
How's this?

>>23372982
How about YOU leave us alone? The people ITT posting on-topic are having a good time. You're the one who doesn't belong here. If you don't enjoy this new, convenient way of making content and just want to find reasons to bitch and complain, go on ahead. But stop making it our fucking problem.

>>23372988
>>23372988
At least make some effort into not looking like an obvious samefag.

>us
>The people
>our
You are not fooling anyone.

It doesn't actually give you something you want that took effort and time to create. It gave you something that vaguely follows the criteria you type in but you didn't carefully design something with intent or purpose. You're just a moronic little piss in a rush to rip his dick off to anything close to his hollow fetish but you have no actual vision, no actual imagination and no actual thoughts. It's lazy and you're too stupid to care because you got a second of dopamine.

>>23372933
The chair melts into the background, which itself has displays that make no sense being placed behind the pilot. Also Jesus fuck what is going on with the left hand (right edge)?

She's also sat crooked with her right knee less a knee and more a weird deformation where the model didn't know how to draw a knee joint with a metal knee guard on it.

Also her right hand has cursed dream logic geometries too, or more accurately the control stick it holds melts into some abstract notion of what might be a throttle rail? It's hard to tell because of how formless and vague everything is outside of the model having seen enough nekopara porn to figure out how to draw one of Sayori's cat girls, and only because you likely specified such things in prompt.

Stop consooming prompts.

>>23372996
it's so hilarious when aishitters like >23372988 get uppity when you call them out on their slop

>this new, convenient way of making content
using "content" without any irony gives it away

>>23372996
Yeah...? Getting a dopamine rush is what masturbation and fetish-art is all about?

I'm sorry that I'm not paying attention to "a chair melting into the background" or her knee is "bent weird". Anyone can zoom into a pic and find some hyper specific tiny detail wrong with it. It's ridiculous to say that it's so bad it would take you out of a good wank.

Look, here's a pic I just found on gelbooru, hand-drawn. It's kind of weird looking, man. The chair doesn't really "make sense". Her proportions are a bit weird. But you don't care, because it's hand drawn, right? What a fucking joke.

>>23372997
>>23373008
Here's another one on Gelbooru from the same artist. Let's hear it, man. What mistakes can you see in this "real art"? Or is this one "better" somehow just because it's hand drawn?

>>23373013
Forgot Image>>23373008
>>23372997

I hate you nigger faggots for not letting this psycopath coomer thread sink into irrelevance and instead engaging with it. You deserve the worst in life.

>>23373018
>>23373008
Broooo you don't understand, these have SOUL, you wouldn't get it man. These are REAL ART

>>23372976
>Deuxfag
>Retarded opinion
Yeah that fits

>>23373019
I feel like you are the actual one who's only one person lmao

>>23373019
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHH WHY ARE PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT STUFF I DONT LIKE WAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>23373013
not him but the worst hand drawn art from Gelbooru will always look better then the best AIslop you will post here.

>>23373048
Dude. Look at the fucking head on this one. >>23373018

Her head is literally over her neck in an unnatural way and there's missing lineart. You're saying this is "better" than the AI pictures above?

>>23373050
yes

>>23373050
It at least looks human

>>23372874
lol

>>23373008
Don't worry anon, you'll be recognized as the greatest ideas guy once all these gatekeeping art frauds are put in place, everyone knows real work starts at middle management.

>consume AI slop, then get excited for new slop!

>>23372744
It looks like shit