>>42306888 depends on which artist illuminati cult you're a part of
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 9:14:23 AM No.42307916
>>42307894 >he doesnt believe hes entitled to artists making free funny animations for his enjoyment ngmi nonski
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 9:14:59 AM No.42307918
>>42307894 if i was an artist i wouldn't mind people talking about me like that in fact, i'd love it. it's like they're on their knees begging for my work
>>42307918 personally, as an artist, it feels nice even when haters show up. just means I'm relevant enough to make someone angry with vanilla pony art
>>42307511 I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't have something in there. There's kind of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DL5e5-6CpAw a now three year tradition https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8fqNXSazBQ of really big projects he's working on.
Here's a crazy thought. Anontheanon is not obligated to be your content slave for your dead franchise and any content he does create should be celebrated but not "regulated"
Because an artist is more than just catering to you. They have their own lives too. Parts of the year not spent doing that is fine because he's already given so much.