Which way, Western man?

left

Left

Neither, I don't like Marble.

>>42307136 (OP)
Right. Come home, White man.

>>42307136 (OP)
yes

>>42307156
is /jdb/ the whitest thread on /mlp/?

>>42307178
It's almost exclusively people from Latin and South America, with the occasional SEA person to boot.

>>42307183
south america is white

>>42307191
shhh, don't tell him

>>42307136 (OP)
Both

>>42307604
https://youtube.com/watch?v=-xVnH7G5h58

>>42307136 (OP)
Raping the whore on the right. Why would you wear such a slutty outfit then act so scared? She needs to be put in her place by being raped to death.

>>42307136 (OP)
I think they look cold like that. They get warm blankets and snuggles.

>>42307628
Her sisters forced her to wear it just so she’d get raped. Have fun!

>>42307737
>Limestone and Pinkie hold Marble down as you plow her
>Maud watches with what Pinkie assures you is her "aroused" face
This appeals greatly to my interests

>>42307136 (OP)
left

>>42307136 (OP)
right

>>42307136 (OP)
Pony vs. Pedo. I'll have one mare please. Now kill yourself.

>>42307136 (OP)
>adult pony
>child
gonna have to go with the pony, chief. even with fillies I don't understand the desire to fuck something that doesn't know what sex is. guess you just have to be totally fucked in the head to be into that, but if you weren't, you wouldn't be here now would you?

>>42307183
anyone else remember the Ya Es Hora threads and what happened with them? Why's it always spanish speakers fucking up the board

>>42307136 (OP)
Left. Always. The left one is a pony.

>>42307136 (OP)
sauce?

>>42307136 (OP)
Both. In 69. With me alternating with side get filled.

>>42307136 (OP)
left

>>42307136 (OP)
Left is my wife, right is our daughter (future wife)

>>42307136 (OP)
Right

>>42307819
>>adult pony
That's clearly a filly

>>42307831
>Ya Es Hora
they got what they deserved
at least /jdb/ros know their limits

>>42307136 (OP)
Right.

>>42307800
>>42307819
Pony has always been stealth pedo, if the left was standing on hind legs she would be the same proportions as the right

>>42309130
If that were true, milfs wouldn't be as popular as they are
Don't get me wrong, I like both, but you seem to be projecting just a bit

>>42309142
>Forgetting the whole wax and waning maturity set by Faust

>>42307136 (OP)

>>42307136 (OP)
left
>>42309130
Are slender or short women pedophilic?
>>42309175
link?

Left. Lolis have no appeal. They're not developed, they don't have anything to hold onto, they don't understand sex even on a basic biological level, they don't have anything valuable to provide in experience, knowledge, creativity, or emotional support. They're fuckin' kids.

>>42309746
Stop, I can only get so erect

>>42307136 (OP)
this way

>>42308869
/jdb/abies should have been banned years ago

>>42307156
>>42307628
>>42307781
>>42308869
>>42308898
But... you would wait 8 years right?

>>42307136 (OP)
>shift + click

>>42310250
No because I have issues and loli marble is legit sexy

>>42307136 (OP)
those are children

>>42310470
Out of 10!

>>42310246
lol you wish

>>42310246
It wasn't that bad in the beginning, but now it's basically an AI request thread.

>>42310487
MORE

>>42310487
my only wish is for it to be shifted to the trash

>>42307136 (OP)
Right

cunny cunny cunny uuuooooooooohhhhhh

>>42310509
Loli is not allowed on /trash/

>>42310246
Posting this brings a smile to my face, because it means you'll see this, and it'll draw you one step closer to our side.
>>42310908
Coming right up kiddo

>>42311013
>our side
What makes you think someone who's disgusted with kid shit is gonna "change sides" because they're surrounded by kid shit

Thread theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGFU0kizUE0&list=RDuGFU0kizUE0&start_radio=1
>>42311028
Some more for you...son

>>42311028
pedos are not known for their intelligence.

>>42311028
You know how trannies think that troon haters are secretly "eggs" themselves? It's kind of like that.

>>42311060
So it's nonsensical projection. Got it.

>>42311041
>>42311060
>>42311065
Denial is one of the first stages in the process my frens.

>>42311080
Look dude. I like thick thighs. I like titties. I like round figures. I like experienced partners who are capable of taking the reins when they feel like their needs aren't met. I don't like genderless prepubescent twigs with no experience or understanding of their ability.

/̵͇̿̿/’̿’̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ FACT ATTACK:

Pedophilia is fine if it’s a woman doing it since they cannot physically injure someone during sex like men do and they are more emotionally sensitive and less obsessed with “destroying” and dominating people. Also young boys want to fuck older women and young girls have a good partner to explore their body with who knows what they are talking about. Moids ruined pedophilia because they are brutes

>>42311093
how long has this ascii gun shit been a thing on /mlp/? I've seen it like three times now since checking in again.

>>42311097
/̵͇̿̿/’̿’̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ Don’t ask questions.

>>42311085
>Look dude. I like thick thighs. I like titties. I like round figures. I like experienced partners who are capable of taking the reins when they feel like their needs aren't met
strong words for a virgin

>>42307136 (OP)
Don't make my vagina hurt, I best be holding onto it real tight before Jimmy starts Slippin his McGill into my Chuck. If you know what I mean!
I CHOOSE PINKIE PIE.

>>42311093
Hello rarity, my names Chris Hanson, why don't you take a seat?

reminder that if you don't like lolicon, you haven't been on the internet for long enough

>>42311093
>he doesn't believe in lolidom
NGMI

>>42311093
Utterly valid post.

>>42311115
I'm going to rape you
>>42311118
And then I will rape you
With my
GIGANTIC
GREEN
COCK

All women can become pedophiles.
All you have to do is twist their maternal instinct a bit

>>42311102
I've had three partners and never resorted to hiring hookers. Better than most lolifags.

>>42311085
You hide your miserable understanding behind euphemisms, lies, and common ground. You want used goods that are well past their expiration date. You want an unsatisfied partner. Cunny has more than you can imagine. You've only seen the surface of it. I advise you preform some research of your own to better educate yourself on the opportunities available.

>>42311097
You have discovered how trend are born my dude

>>42311118
https://mangadex.org/chapter/b0f03c32-4c8f-4c38-8c2d-1ede54a4b71d/10

Read.

>>42311126
dakimakuras don't count

>>42311127
Don’t say used goods. That’s an ugly term. It doesn’t affect satisfaction at all, you can have women who want to be loyal to a man and will be fulfilled even if they have been penetrated before. It’s just skin on skin, it doesn’t matter

>>42311120

Why are humanization fags always, without exception, child molesters?

>>42311127
What euphemism and what lie. As for common ground, yeah, I like my partners to be functioning, independent adults with the ability to convey their needs or take what they want. Because a dead fish partner isn't fun for either party. I've had two partners who don't have independence and they're insufferable and smothering. A needy child would just remind me of the neet I tried to teach how to adult and I'd be instantly turned off.
There's no expiration date for romantic or sexual partners before literal death. Partners your own age aren't some kind of scary thing. They age along with you, learn alongside you, build bonds similarly to you. Having such a massively wide gap in power, mental faculty and capability with your partner just leads to either having to put all your energy into protecting them or becoming a monster.

You're not converting me. And I have a feeling that the only ones being converted are merely virgins with rage, compensating for their inability to satisfy anyone of sexual maturity.
>>42311156
Truly a question for the ages. We will never be rid of the pedo menace until EqG is banned.

>>42311129
Why are the japanese like this?

>>42311013
I can assure you, there's not a single thing you could do to draw me to "your side"

>>42311127
and they say irony poisoning isn't real.

>>42311123
All women are pedophiles

>>42311160
all this talk about romance bonding and aging from a fag who admits to having multiple partners
you were never the first choice of your "experienced mature woman" nor will be the last considering that you ended up posting here of all places on the internet
keep believing that children are primitive creatures who can't surprise you in any way and have nothing to say or show, nor can be mature enough to take care of you like a true NPC brainlet

>>42311233
I'm not asking for someone who has a bodycount in the hundreds here, I'm just saying someone who's not a ten year old virgin who's going to be in excruciating pain the second I'm fully inside her.
Believe it or not I'm in the early stages with someone right now, might end up going further or might just end up as a roommate situationship, but it's looking good.
And children can "surprise" you but that doesn't make them ideal partners. That makes them bright minds untainted by the constraints of reality. Which might be nice but in many cases can get overbearing when you have to be the one to crush their dreams of being a space-pirate. And most importantly it comes with the baggage of being the one to explain to them how sex works. I wouldn't trust an adult to teach a preteen sex outside of a brief portion of biology class, so why would I want a kid as a PARTNER?

>>42311250
As long as they make you happy just don’t worry about it

>>42311250
anon, just stop. you cannot rationalize with a pedophile. his brain is so fucked that he cannot realize it, nor will he ever. he will continue to believe whatever he wants.

>>42311165
Stay strong, those faggots managed to corrupt me some months ago but I'm finding my way back

>>42311278
You become whatever you expose yourself to. Just avoid it.

>>42311278
I'm a bit curious as to how you were corrupted and how you're finding your way back. Like either you like it or you don't. I dunno. A friend of mine was an anonfillyfag and had projected onto sexual fantasies but that was still painted with experiential identity -- Anon still had past memories of adult life and the real fantasy was mainly being turned into something cute and being taken less seriously than you would if you were human.
It's one thing to project onto a character in that manner, and entirely another to be attracted to an underage character *because* they're underage. It's a matter of intent. Are your intentions at least in the right place?

>>42311278
Loli is an art style. It's not the same thing as real kids. If you find yourself looking at loli, enjoy it. If you're looking at real kids, get help.
>t. father who's enjoyed loli for decades and has never once done anything sexual with any of his children

>>42311292
Yeah but you’ve thought about it

>>42311292
You deserve to get chopped in a woodchipper.

>>42311292
I've seen so many cases of loli/foalcon/cub people turning out to have CP that I really don't trust the 2D-3D talking point. Yes, it's illustrations, but what is the *intent* behind consuming it? Is the fact they're kids what turns you on? Do your fantasies involve anything past observation? Do you *really* only find the 2D ones attractive? At least with foalcon there's a whole species difference, and it's more different than anthro is from human. At the very least lolicon temporarily sates the urges of sick people, but the same can be said of drugs and those have diminishing returns, leading to more consumption and more radical things down the line, unless there's a rock-bottom moment to shock the system.

>>42311290
>I'm a bit curious as to how you were corrupted and how you're finding your way back
I saw this pic on /jdb/ and I jerked off to it, but now I'm avoiding this kind of content

>>42311316
Ehhh...it's one thing to have jerked off to something once. I jerked off to uhhhh some guy named Henmaru's weird ass trypophobia-fuel doujin called The Holes. I can't say I actually find it all that hot though. Maybe the corruption aspect but the holes themselves are just kinda gross to me, lol.

>>42311316
And yet the OP got your attention and instead of shift+clicking, you're in this thread. Good job, dingus.

>>42311250
i've met a 12yo who was more mature than most adults and who could teach you a thing or two about life. age has nothing to do with what you say
children only act like children because you treat them as children. threat them as equals (adults) and you'll have a mature person
>>42311265
nice argument, faggot. apply yourself to the Graham's pyramid

>>42311299
Actually, no. I can't convince you of that, but it's true. Prepubescent kids have zero interest in sex, and I have zero interest in rape. Plus, actual nude children aren't sexy. Especially not when you're trying to convince them to get dressed because you need to take them to school because you need to get to work.
>>42311300
Hi there, Mr. Orwell!
>>42311308
There's some crossover between actual pedophiles and people who just happen to like loli and foal stuff, but they're not the same. Most loli and foal art is a blend of conventionally sexy and super cute. I like sexy and I like cute, so I like most loli and foal art.
There's some loli art drawn in a non-cute and hyperrealistic manner. I don't find it appealing. That stuff is by and for pedos only.
>>42311316
You can jerk off to almost anything once without really being into it. You might never find yourself tempted by lolis again, and that's okay. Or you might find that you enjoy their cute sexyness. That's okay, too. It's just pictures. It only crosses the line when it's real children. Don't ever EVER cross that line.

>>42310493
Yeah, that happen when the majority of the artist that did loli for MLP moved to make lolis for other animes

>>42311351
I don't like children

>>42311362
You are Gollyfag aren't you?

>>42311364
No, he hates my wife

>>42311351
>Plus, actual nude children aren't sexy
Well...broken clock's right twice a day at least. I still don't really trust you, but I'd at least be willing to break bread with you. The other foal/loli guys on this board though, have been some of the most obnoxious, hypersexual and propagandistic people on the whole site. I think even the lolifags on bbwchan aren't as pushy or obnoxious as the /mlp/ loli crowd.

I'm not like woodchipper anon, at least as long as 3D CP isn't found on anyone's hard drives, but I just. Can't ignore or bridge the gap with people who are openly into loli. And it's frustrating that the debate is constantly brought up no matter what threads you stick to and you're always seen as the weird one for saying grown-ups are sexy.

>>42311388
actual nude children aren't sexy
debatable

>>42311413
>unlabeled, uncited study on sexual attractiveness with no control group or even parameters for sexual attractiveness
Whatever you say.

>>42311418
can someone post that study from the 90s? i don't have the pdf on me rn and this fag needs a bitchslap

>>42311425
>the 90s
Wow, sound like the modern people just figure out that some things are actually wrong and that why it changed nowday and get more criticized compared to almost 40 years ago

>>42311425
I need a bitchslap because you posted a graph with no further context as though it tells the entire story? Sorry for displaying my tiny modicum of skepticism and not listening and believing like a good feminist.

>>42311425
>the 90s
Weren't insane asylums still giving people yogurt enemas and shit in the 90s?

>>42311388
I wish we could all agree to not click on threads we know we won't like. I don't click on stallion threads. I don't click on RGRE. I don't click on braps or futas or noncon or G5. And I post foals only in foal threads and lolis only in loli threads. It's a more pleasant way to browse /mlp/.
I don't think you're weird for finding grown-ups sexy. They are (I like them too). But lolicons are the subject of a lot of hate, some (not all) of it irrational and unhinged, and it makes some of us get defensive and start projecting. Which isn't helpful to anyone, but wdytwa, after all?
>>42311413
>>42311425
You know that chart is bullshit, right? Sometimes people claim it comes from a study of Hall et al, but the actual paper has nothing remotely like that chart. If anything, the data in that paper suggests that attraction to underage females is less common than attraction to adult females.

whoa, look at all those angry comments
>>42311435
no, it means that it's supposed to stay like that to make some $. you don't even know the half of it because they keep silent about it
>>42311437
i'm pretty sure that we haven't evolved that much since the 90s
>>42311440
did you actually read the paper? no, you did not. you read someone "summarizing" it

>>42311445
Actually, yes, I did read the paper. I wrote >>42147777. The chart is bullshit.

>>42311448
no, it states that 1 in 5 men is a lolicon. you read what you wanted to read

>>42311440
>I wish we could all agree to not click on threads we know we won't like
I wish I could make everyone do that but this entire board is loaded with ragebait. It's impossible to keep anything with unironic entertainment or discussion off of page 8-10. There's almost nothing to do anymore but engage with the b8 or give up entirely. As is becoming increasingly common among anons.
>>42311448 (>>42147777)
>Variables other than arousal to pedophilic stimuli may motivate many child molesters, including deviant cognitions, affective dyscontrol, and developmentally related personality problems (Hall & Hirschman, 1992).
Wow, that's enlightening to hear. But it does make sense. Many people refer to molesters as having a tendency toward controlling behavior or a violent streak, and certainly the pedos I've encountered or been shown over the years have been.....of a different stock (see: retarded)

Well I'll say this much: I'm starting to trust you a lot more than the anon that posted the chart, kek. Thanks for the food for thought, I guess I'll have to read that study sometime.

>>42311457
yes, do actually read the paper like the other guy did not. also read this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puberty
and rethink your stance because you fags are trying to be smarter than nature

>>42311485
>wikipedia page on puberty
What exactly is the point in pasting that?

>>42311454
I know reading is hard for you, but if you're not going to put in the effort to read the paper, then I suggest you at least read my summary in >>42147777.
>>42311457
It's been nice talking with you, too. Do give the study a read if you like psychology. Or maybe even if you don't; it's not my field, but I did learn a lot from the paper.

>>42311504
because evolution decided that humans are ready to fuck and should be more attractive for potential partners at a much younger age and than whatever society got gaslighted into and no amount of mental gymnastics will change that
>>42311520
read the fucking >>42311485 you retard, it's not that long

>>42311299
>government should punish for thoughts

Why are conservatives like this?

Threads like these are always interesting to watch because no one ever "wins".
At the end of the day, you'll bicker and seethe and call the other person a faggot and tell them to kill themselves, but
neither of you have changed the minds of the other person. Once again, you've erased precious free time from your life and
neither person has gained anything besides the belief that they succeeded at yet another internet fight, putting yet
another retard in their place.
We're never going to see "You're right, anon. It's okay to fuck kids" from anon, let alone have him believe it.
Or "You make a good point, anon. Wanting to fuck kids isn't okay", and this anon will never believe it.
Is that all this board (or this site) is? A place to rant? Nobody ever wins arguments here.

>>42311533
I didn’t say that you insecure bitch, i’m just saying people are so eager to deny the attraction when in reality you can have it and still behave like a responsible adult

>>42311485
Going through it now, been feeling restless so I thought I'd crack it open. I have to object a second time: I assumed that the mention of having 80 subjects was a misread on my part, but that's it? 80 subjects to extrapolate 20-27% of the male population of America? Remember that America has more than half that many *states.* Would you trust any study on global averages that only took one or two people from every state? On one hand the trends in those 80 people can be helpful in learning what stimulates men physiologically, assuming they're 'normal' enough, but the lack of a control and the small sample size makes any kind of percentage point about the 300 million people in America kinda moot. I mean god damn, at least 100 would be divisible from 100 for a percentage base, but 20% of 80 is only 16. So 16 men showed an arousal to the images.
>>42311524
Evolution also decided that sharks should rape their partners and praying mantises should behead theirs. Evolution is amoral. The reason we set ages of consent as high as we do is so that puberty can mostly complete and the hormones in our mind driving us to short-term sexual gratification have mostly subsided.
>>42311534
>Is that all this board (or this site) is? A place to rant?
It's all we have anymore. I'd say we have some kind of creative or sociable soul but I don't even know if I believe that anymore. So we just drift along, trying to find something decent, failing, then getting into heated arguments in bait threads.

>>42307136 (OP)
>expect the answer to be unanimously left
>instead it's 50/50
Sasuga nu/mlp/

>>42311524
The paper is reporting a statistic that they believe is relevant and consistent with what other studies found. They did not perform a statistical hypothesis test or an effect size measurement or anything like that. (Maybe those other studies did, but I haven't looked at them.) You are drawing a conclusion that the paper does not.

>>42311534
>"You make a good point, anon. Wanting to fuck kids isn't okay"
that was never the core point of this little argument. anon said that
>actual nude children aren't sexy
and i showed him that they are to quite a lot of people. but he'd rather move the goalposts than actually refute the core point
just take a look at >>42311541 >>42311545. now they picked the wrong states. sharks out of nowhere as if they have jackshit to do with homo sapiens or primates for that matter. now the paper is wrong because it's based on other papers as if they don't do that statistical shit since forever
>>42311545
there's also a Japanese study (the country where 12yo are okay to fuck) which basically states that one in 6 men is attracted to children more than mature women. no, i don't have that pdf either

>>42311435
>>42311437
and no. they can't do such research nowdays because it's forbidden and taboo

>>42311572
Because we growth and realize that it will always be wrong, studies aren't needed, it's just wrong.

>>42311576
>don't edit human DNA to prevent HIV forever, goy! it's just le wrong and immoral!

>>42311564
>now they picked the wrong states
What does that mean
>sharks out of nowhere as if they have jackshit to do with homo sapiens or primates for that matter
I used that as an example of how evolution doesn't determine healthy behavior, it just determines what survives. Evolution also gave us an appendix and living cleanly basically breaks it. It gave us a pretty blatant blind spot in our vision. It gave us muscles that atrophy when not regularly exercised along with bones that can permanently fracture and be stuck that way even with the help of modern medicine, rendering the muscles around the broken bone borderline useless. Hell that's why race horses that break a leg are retired or put down.
>now the paper is wrong because it's based on other papers as if they don't do that statistical shit since forever
I didn't say that much but if all the study has to say is "go back and read that study for any kind of conclusion" then it didn't do much, did it? All the study seems to have done is checked whether 80 men popped a boner at softcore porn of different age groups. If the previous studies it cited are of equal rigor then they're not very rigorous and can be dismissed as pretty unserious research.

>>42311541
n=80 subjects does seem preposterously small if you're not familiar with this kind of study. But if the question you are asking is a yes-no question, like, "Do there exist normal men who are stimulated by pedophilic imagery?" then n=80 is actually a lot more than you need. The study is extremely convincing on this point: Yes, such men definitely do exist! They found enough that this is not a fluke!
The study does not claim, "The percentage of such men is definitely, ironclad, for sure between 20% and 27%." That's a more difficult question to answer for exactly the reasons you say. All they can do is report their data: Based on their sample, with all its caveats and deficiencies, their best estimate is between 20% and 27%. If you asked them, I'm sure they'd tell you not to put much faith in those exact numbers.

>>42311591
Yeah, if the goal is to determine that such men and impulses exist then they did accomplish that much. Still...it feels like such a silly point. It's like saying that there are normal men who like berry porn. Like, yeah, they have to exist somewhere. There's too many people in the human race for *everyone* with this impulse to be a convicted sex offender.

>>42311588
>it just determines what survives
and it decided that you should start fucking at around the age of 11 because that was the best option through natural selection. whatever humans did to warp their natural behaviour (like posting on /mlp/) is of no concern to it. it's hard-coded into you
> then it didn't do much, did it?
there are literally papers that gather up other papers and make a general statement. that's exactly how it was determined that 5G is not a direct thread to human health (about 15k papers saying no problem and 600 saying that there is a problem)
>All the study seems to have done is checked whether 80 men popped a boner at softcore porn of different age groups
by all means try to make a similar research nowdays and contribute to the science. with a much larger sample size and more rigorous than ever before. see if they give you funds or even allow you

>>42311596
>There's too many people in the human race for *everyone* with this impulse to be a convicted sex offender.
Are there? How can you be sure? Anti-loli propaganda often claims, "If you look at lolis, then you're sick and abnormal, just because you look at lolis." And I'm pretty sure that a lot of people really and unironically believe that is absolutely true with no exceptions. This study says they're wrong. There are men who seem to be fairly normal and who are also aroused by lolis. There is no reason to believe there is anything wrong with these men. The absolutist point-of-view is wrong.

For what it's worth, I suspect the same is true of a lot of other fetishes: There are a lot of men (and women) who are both "normal" and also aroused by things that are not "normal."

here's a fun fact: if you live in 'murica, send your kid to rob a shop naked. why? because nobody is legally allowed to watch the security footage since it's a video of an underage

>>42311634
>legally
the FBI watches CP all the time, to "identify victims" and the like.

>>42311613
>and it decided that you should start fucking at around the age of 11 because that was the best option through natural selection
Because the tendency of humans was to die before their first birthday due to infections and birth defects and fetal alcohol syndrome. Now we have medicine and clean water, so there's no genuine reason to immediately pump thirteen kids in a 12 year old girl. Unless you're some kind of great-replacement counter-baby factory here to outperform the muzzies through sheer birthrates.
>there are literally papers that gather up other papers and make a general statement. that's exactly how it was determined that 5G is not a direct thread to human health (about 15k papers saying no problem and 600 saying that there is a problem)
But those aggragators are compiling a shit ton of studies and comparing their results. This study merely cites two or three without going over the content within them. At least the 5G study aggregation was meant to find a consensus by separating the outlier noise from the goods.
>by all means try to make a similar research nowdays and contribute to the science. with a much larger sample size and more rigorous than ever before. see if they give you funds or even allow you
All I'm hearing is "methodology is stricter therefore nothing can be done, therefore old studies are to be treated as gospel truth." Just because researchers aren't allowed to stockpile CP doesn't render all pursuit of data impossible. Just means there have to either be close controls on the content, ethically sourced (not-actual CP) images/videos, or some other means of collecting this data. Getting more people to participate ought to actually be easier today given the density of city environments and the power of the internet to spread the study's net out further than it might reach with flyers or newspapers.

>>42311650
>there's no genuine reason to immediately pump thirteen kids in a 12 year old girl
the fetish *is* the reason.

>>42311650
>so there's no genuine reason to immediately pump thirteen kids in a 12 year old girl
of course not. but that doesn't mean that you can't. whether you should is debatable but based on possible health complications to the future mother rather than some arbitrary customs that change every few decades
>This study merely cites two or three without going over the content within them
because nobody is allowed to do more
>Just because researchers aren't allowed to stockpile CP doesn't render all pursuit of data impossible
except that's exactly the reason why it's impossible. it's like you were trying to make a paper on subjective effects of LSD without ever taking LSD. you can never describe that feeling without experiencing it first
>ethically sourced (not-actual CP) images/videos, or some other means of collecting this data
well, that defeats the whole purpose, doesn't it?
again, try it yourself. announce what you want to do. see how far you'll get with funds and other things
>but i can't get photos of kids!
you'll find underage models willing to pose for your camera, with a clear approval of their parents if you offer some $. how do you think all those CP studios operate?
>>42311647
a lot of those agents are convicted pedos who got offered a job of luring out more pedos in exchange of not ending up in a prison because they're familiar with the community