>>42311650
>so there's no genuine reason to immediately pump thirteen kids in a 12 year old girl
of course not. but that doesn't mean that you can't. whether you should is debatable but based on possible health complications to the future mother rather than some arbitrary customs that change every few decades
>This study merely cites two or three without going over the content within them
because nobody is allowed to do more
>Just because researchers aren't allowed to stockpile CP doesn't render all pursuit of data impossible
except that's exactly the reason why it's impossible. it's like you were trying to make a paper on subjective effects of LSD without ever taking LSD. you can never describe that feeling without experiencing it first
>ethically sourced (not-actual CP) images/videos, or some other means of collecting this data
well, that defeats the whole purpose, doesn't it?
again, try it yourself. announce what you want to do. see how far you'll get with funds and other things
>but i can't get photos of kids!
you'll find underage models willing to pose for your camera, with a clear approval of their parents if you offer some $. how do you think all those CP studios operate?
>>42311647
a lot of those agents are convicted pedos who got offered a job of luring out more pedos in exchange of not ending up in a prison because they're familiar with the community
