>>126677447>BeabadoobeeIsn't her stuff professionally produced? I also don't quite see what a producer would really tell her to do all that differently either. She just makes pleasant pop music that apes 90s alt rock. It's nothing special but also not really bedroom demo tier stuff.
I know you were just naming an example but it seems like an odd choice. If anything I feel the sheer abundance of tutorials and plugins for every step of the music production process, from writing to mastering, leads to a very narrow view on what is deemed acceptable and what not.
The problem isn't so much music being "soulless" (what does that even mean??) or "low quality", the problem is that it all sounds the exact same. You'd think with everyone being able to produce at least decent sounding recordings for little cost would lead to all kinds of interesting, out there music since you could just go with your craziest ideas without being constrained by what the label tells you. Instead, it leads to extremely formulaic music because most musicians are clout chaser and those who want to make it have to learn to play the algorithm, which encourages aiming for the lowest common denominator possible. This phenomenon always existed of course but the internet amplified it a ton.