>>126811711 (OP)
Flamin Groovies

>>126811711 (OP)
love one direction but i'm partial to the jonas brothers myself

>>126811725
Fuck off copycat

>>126811711 (OP)
My real answer is that I'll take Between the Buttons over any other album by either band

>>126811711 (OP)
this has never even been a debate. are you retarded or baiting? the rolling stones are essentially a novelty band that had cool live shows while the beatles invented the music industry.

I cant tell if this is bait because this board actually is infested with retards these days

>Gimmie Shelter
>Jumpin' Jack Flash
>Sympathy for the Devil
>Paint it Black
These are arguably better than most Beatles songs
The stones had higher highs but the Beatles were more consistent

>>126811876
>the music industry.
further proof beatles fans are manchildren who only care about muh popularity and muh sales

>>126811878
>These are arguably better than most Beatles songs
So there are still better beatles song, therefore beatles had higher highs AND were more consistent
Kek this isn't even a contest, the rolling slops are a cool band but aren't even in the same galaxy as the beatles

>>126811878
>higher highs
Codeword for "they're clearly the worst band but I'm gonna pretend they weren't". Those songs look like higher highs because they're good songs among the sea of mostly mediocre TRS songs in their entire discography

>>126811911
Satisfaction is also #1 on many all time rock song lists, so there's another W for the stones

>>126811711 (OP)
there is no debate really
Beatles for melody
and the Stones for Swing and Sex

>>126811711 (OP)
>debate
Lmao, Lennon/McCartney wrote Rolling Stones` first hit ever. ˜Debate˜. Lol. They are not even the same sport.

>When asked what he thought of The Rolling Stones, Lennon replied: “I think its a lot of hype. I like ‘Honky Tonk Woman’ but I think Mick’s a joke, with all that fag dancing, I always did. I enjoy it, I’ll probably go and see his films and all, like everybody else, but really, I think it’s a joke.”

>Taking things a step further, Lennon made the not-so-subtle hint that Jagger and the Stones regularly copied the Beatles: “I would like to just list what we did and what the Stones did two months after on every fuckin’ album. Every fuckin’ thing we did, Mick does exactly the same – he imitates us.”
>Lennon believed his band were being copied across their career: “And I would like one of you fuckin’ underground people to point it out, you know Satanic Majesties is Pepper, ‘We Love You’, it’s the most fuckin’ bullshit, that’s ‘All You Need Is Love’.

>“I resent the implication that the Stones are like revolutionaries and that the Beatles weren’t. If the Stones were or are, the Beatles really were too.”

>Lennon doesn’t want to climb down though, “But they are not in the same class, music-wise or power-wise, never were. I never said anything, I always admired them, because I like their funky music and I like their style. I like rock and roll and the direction they took after they got over trying to imitate us, you know, but he’s even going to do Apple now. He’s going to do the same thing.”

>Lennon concluded: “He’s obviously so upset by how big the Beatles are compared with him; he never got over it. Now he’s in his old age, and he is beginning to knock us, you know, and he keeps knocking. I resent it, because even his second fuckin’ record we wrote it for him. Mick said ‘Peace made money’. We didn’t make any money from Peace. You know.”

>>126814003
Very nice. Have you seen this before?

>>126811711 (OP)
The Stones at their peak were amazing and deserve all the aclaim but in their 63 active years as a band, they have never done what the Beatles did in 8.

>>126811711 (OP)
the both have 4-5 albums worth listening to each and no more

>>126811725
who?

>>126811878
>more consistent
That depends on whether you like the McCartney granny music that makes up half of every Beatles album

>>126814003
both of them copied Brian "Genius" WIlson

>>126814004
Show us your music chart

>>126817270
Is this the first or second Paul?

>>126811711 (OP)
The Beatles obviously since they are in the DNA of every single rock song that came after them.

>>126811711 (OP)
Don't like the comparison. it's basically blues rock&roll compared with more poppy experimental stuff, more piano etc.

they are just 2 very different bands to me.

Yes they existed around the same time and from the same place.

>>126819167
Paul Zero

>>126811711 (OP)
this is for 2nd place I take it?