Alright let’s settle this, who was objectively the worst Beetle? Don’t say all of them

Stuart Sutcliffe easily was the worst Beatle. Nobody even remembers he existed or was ever a member, he's a deep cut even to retards who bring up Pete Best and think they're being clever

>>126903412 (OP)
George
>Paul was the most skilled musician
>John had the most original and daring ideas
>both together were a powerhouse of hitmaking
>Ringo had swing and was the most professional of the bunch
George was the odd one off
unskilled, lazy, whiny, bitchy, temperamental, mediocre at playing and composing, never came up with anything other than loose ideas for the others to polish for him, pushed his shitty songs into the albums, and forced that indian crap into the band
fuck him

>>126903412 (OP)
It’s Ringo, the other 3 wrote classic songs

Ringo with no doubt

>S-tier
Paul
>A-tier
Lennon
>B-tier
Billy Preston
>C-tier
Ringo
>D-tier
Pete Best
>F-tier
Stuart Sutcliffe

>>126903412 (OP)
>>126903451
>>126903484
All of them. Old /mu/ would've agreed, this board would bully you for liking them.

>>126903484
>Billy Preston
The fact that this boy-raping closet case got his image rehabilitated due to Get Back is a travesty.

>>126903412 (OP)
george. i’ll take ringo’s songs over his. good night. with a little help. act naturally. george is one pip less cool. john and paul are kinda tied as the top. george can go if i had to drop just one. he’s just a more nasal paul/john, and i can live without that whereas ringo’s songs must stay. if you mean who is the top contributor as musician, same. ringo stays just for the drums on tomorrow never knows alone

>>126903412 (OP)
Fake Paul

>>126903548
How's the job search going?

>>126903548
You call that John Lennon wall paper, motherfucker?
Fuck you!
I'll show you some real John Lennon wall paper, and I'll shove it down your throat.

Ringo