will they ever release the legendary Reed/Siwa tapes?

you are 18 year old girl

>AI
This board is for people over the age of 18

AI slop

>>127119765 (OP)
>>127119775
Which AI are you making this stuff with?

>>127119856

>AI that pretends to not know the most famous people ever
terrible.

i use Sora

>flat as a board
is the AI true to life here?

I made an AI video of Hayley Williams slapping Steve Albini in the face and kneeing him in the balls.

>>127120173
>>127120179
Believe it or not her names should be pronounced Holly Williams

Bobbie goes electric

Roger Water's song about the death of his father:
"When The Tiger's Broke Free"

>>127120690
Cuuuute.

I have tons of AI images of naked Ann Wilson getting perved on by goofy looking googly-eyed dinosaurs that I made when I was high as fuck.

>>127120224
>it's written upside down, so only legible when she does these flips

>>127121781
yeah, thats her gimmick

>>127120690
vvvvery nice

Talentless Hacks

anyone got tickets for this summer

More Hayley lol

>>127120077
>>127120004
>>127119765 (OP)
VS
>>127119988
>>127119955
>>127119941
>>127120031

I think understand now what it was like to be in the 80s seeing cgi compared to now

>>127126398
80s cgi went paired with practical and optical fx. It was always impressive and immersive, since it was the first time seeing such stuff. Its today that we can actually assess and compare cgi quality, and its despite todays monster cpu power, always fake, best cgi in history is still jurassic park, mind you.

There you go

Aw what a cutie

>>127126539
True I love stuff like Lawnmower Man/Early Pixar shorts, I meant the "woah, it can NOT get better looking than this"

post more sloppers

brian was a true patriot

>ai slop
>canadian ip
You guys are consistently the lowest quality posters on this site
Rangeban when

>>127129381
cope

>>127129381
Lot of INDIANs in Canada

>>127129783
AI memes are the future get over it gramps. you sound like me when i first saw a meme. why do people post these weird images, grr! it's probably just insert X race here, teehee!

low IQ bro think deeper

The 21st century will be an Indian century

>>127129859
this you

>>127129822
The massive presence of Indians in Canada is also the future. Doesn't mean it's a good thing.

Shit thread

>>127130983
believe me, i know. i live in toronto. but blindly seething about indians, and blindly seething about AI, or now blindy seething about their connection, is pointless and gay. there is usefulness and fun to be had out of gen AI imagery. might as well use it, or do you have more fun seething?

>>127134096

>>127135311
You can have fun with it and also admit that it's slop and that the more generative AI is used in a piece of media, the more negatively affected it is by it. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

>>127129381
>canadian ip
>>127135311
>i live in toronto
What the fuck?
You can see user IPs?

>>127135442
well i reject the term slop entirely as it's a self-soothing buzzphrase for the pseud masses to give themselves the illusion of superiority. 'slop' aka low quality content was everywhere even before AI came around. AI will flood the landscape and cause a sea change and it will have positive and negative impacts, like anything

AI is already used in hollywood to enhance the workflow in numerous ways- when they made movie posters for a24 civil war, was the media 'negatively effected' by that? what about in the brutalist when they used AI to fix his accent, was the movie negatively effected? when you paint something distracting out of the background of a photo with genfill, is the media negatively effected?

eventually ppl will come around to the idea that it often has a Positive impact on media, actually

Drum machi- I mean AI has no soul, man

>>127135969
>i reject the term slop entirely as it's a self-soothing buzzphrase for the pseud masses to give themselves the illusion of superiority
Textbook cope

>>127136009
Drum machines were always worse than real drums

>>127119765 (OP)
Did they?

>>127136009
ROFL-all slop

>>127136515
spoken like someone who has been riding the easy cheap self congratulatory high of deeming things slop all year without ever thinking twice

remember how last year you were calling everything 'mid'? remember how it got sour eventually, and the only people still saying it are the lowest of the normies? thats what's happening right now under your nose. now you know

>>127135984
The art in the bottom image is the worst thing that ever happened to the art world, and chances are that the people who hate AI are also against modern art.

>>127136673
>remember how last year you
Do you have schizophrenia?

>>127135984
Points for trying, Ranjeesh

>>127136673
>spoken like someone who has been riding the easy cheap self congratulatory high of deeming things slop all year without ever thinking twice
Yeah, anyone who disagrees with you does so out of logical fallacies, while everything positive you tell yourself about AI is the objective truth and has nothing to do with you enjoying it and having to justify it out of your incapability to accept anything negative about something you associated with yourself.

>>127136688
>chances are
'my mental cope is', FTFY. that assumption does not bear out
>>127136705
the greater you ;)
>>127136714
tired filler racism, get a new line

>>127136757
well yea in this case i do happen to have the more evolved opinion than your front page 'ree AI baddd' plebbitor. deal with it?

>>127135969
>'slop' aka low quality content was everywhere even before AI came around.
It's not black and white. The ease with which you're able to shit out absolute garbage (for example this thread) means that everyone who used to be too untalented to make art (for example yourself) can now flood the Internet with their garbage at an unprecedented pace.
Sites like YouTube and Google images are unusable now because anything you search will return a mountain of low-quality trash that people churn out for money and not for quality.

>AI will flood the landscape and cause a sea change and it will have positive and negative impacts
The opposite is already happening now.
You have no reason to be this optimistic when we can already observe the opposite. You're using the same non-logic as the people who said "immigrants will flood the country and cause a sea change and it will have positive and negative impacts" to promote mass immigration when it was obvious from the start that the negatives would massively outweigh the positives.

>like anything
Like indians in canada?

>AI is already used in hollywood to enhance the workflow in numerous ways- when they made movie posters for a24 civil war, was the media 'negatively effected' by that? what about in the brutalist when they used AI to fix his accent, was the movie negatively effected? when you paint something distracting out of the background of a photo with genfill, is the media negatively effected?
I'm not against AI in technical roles. I'm against it being used generatively to create media from scratch.
For every case in which that kind of AI is used in a positive way, there are a billion jeets shitting out complete garbage with it.

>eventually ppl will come around to the idea that it often has a Positive impact on media, actually
That "often" is very small compared to the "almost always" of the negative impact.

>>127136779
QED

>>127136796
its not fun for most because its lazy and usually not really creative because any average joe with a random lazy idea like 'angry kanye pointing finger at camera with a 'no fun allowed' sign in the background' can make it
Oasis fighting medieval warfare against eachother zaaayuuumm. How is that fun

>>127136951
The AIslopper is easily entertained. He literally doesn't see the difference between ai slop and great art, so he thinks this trash is good and valuable.
Maybe one day he'll learn to distinguish great art from shitty art, and he'll realize that everything he posted ITT fits under shitty art.

>>127136951
'lazy idea'
it's a meme you mouthbreathing sheeptard. how much effort goes into your average pepe post?

>>127137148
>everything he posted ITT fits under shitty art
trad-tard karens like yourself see AI and your vision goes red and you start your sperg paragraphs without thinking about- oh wait, this isn't trying to be 'art' - these are MEMES, remember? how dumb do you have to be to whine about memes not being artful enough?

>>127137248
>pepe post
Yeah that's about the same level
Pepe, wojaks, ai, all garbage for low-iq people

>>127136920
boring filler seethe paragraphs. you rage against ai while meanwhile u might as well be a bot yourself. no original thought

>>127137269
Oh so now it's no longer "AI will be beneficial to art". It's "i-its just a m-meme, it's supposed to be shit".
You can just admit it bro, this is low quality trash, even for meme standards.

>>127137288
yes, welcome to the world of memes and shitposting. one man's 'garbage for low IQ people' is the next person's kek-worthy internet joke. no one is under the illusion that theyre pumping out van goghs here. its you who's trying to hold it to that standard when it was never relevant, probably because youre missing the forest fo the trees. many such cases

>>127137320
it's both dumbass. it was never one or the other. it's beneficial to artists, and beneficial to meme makers. you are legitimately a slow minded person

>>127137298
You don't have a counterargument. You know it's digital diarrhea and all you can defend it with is insults and bullshit nonarguments like "this other type of content is also shit".

Captcha: KYSTT

>>127137342
Glad you finally admitted it's garbage slop

>>127137378
reeeee
>>127137363
reeeeeeee

>>127137354
Generative art like what you're posting isn't useful to artist outside of extremely rare exceptions.
Technical tools (like a photoshop background eraser or something) are. Big difference.

>beneficial to meme makers.
At the expense of everyone else who has the misfortune of seeing your worthless unfunny and ugly memes.

>>127137408
You're the only one reeing and posting insults instead of defending your points (since that's impossible)

>>127137420
>>127137436
must suck being this behind. arguments beamed in from 2021. i am above these lowly discussions. rage moar

you in the middle

>>127137465
You talk exactly like the retards who pushed for mass immigration, telling sane people that being against it is antiquated and that the world must progress past these old ideas like xenophobia and racism.
And just like mass immigration, you praise its few theoretical upsides while ignoring the much greater downsides (already observable and society-ruining), all without realizing that you're just falling for the propaganda of the mega corporations (the only ones that really benefit from it) that pushed it on you.
AI is the digital indian.

Anyway, I'm done talking to you.
Have fun with your shit while us sane people enjoy actual art.

>>127137586
yea youre just wrong and coping deeper and deeper. and i hate mass immigration, i hate indians and i dont use words like xenophobia. i aint some gay lib youve twisted me into though you low IQ assumption. i am simply a man who can see the appeal of AI as a tool for creatives, as well as the obvious future of memes

was david lynch 'just falling for the propaganda pushed on him?' or maybe he actually used it and found it useful, beyond the 'ree big corpos!' of it all?

'if youre catching a lot of flak, you're probably right over the target' indeed

same shit different era

Ah yes, David Lynch, the one authority on art.

Meanwhile this is his art
https://youtu.be/6QJpY2VNP0E
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTPQcjlcvvXFtR0R91Gh5j9Xi8cq0oN3Y
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTPQcjlcvvXExy6Ti4TccyRvwntL00b2w
The man was literally senile KEK what a spokesperson

>>127137795
>posts a bunch of kino
>he was Kek incarnate, what a spokesman lol!
you're making my point for me. lynch was known for his non traditional, warped, often grainy low fi approach, sometimes literally being an early adopter to new tech and embracing it for its imperfections before the quirks have been worked out, while his peers were snobbishly looking down their nose at it
>it is happening again

>>127137880
You pretend to like him because he agrees with you. If he was anti ai you would say he's a hack, a retard, etc.

literally me rn

>>127137944
low IQ assumptions intensify...
im a big lynch fan, regardless of his stance on AI. he just happens to have reached the same stance as me, which is a hilarious dagger in the heart of all the TP pseuds who've decided AI is the devil

similarly, i like neil young's music, but disagree with him on being a libtard nutcase. people can hold two concepts at once

>>127138003
Not believable.

>>127138043

>>127138003
Did you really make a collage of reddit posts to make fun of?

>>127138066
oh thats the least of what I've done

Unbelievably pathetic

>>127138219
to seethe about a meme thread? couldnt agree more friend

>>127129631
This goes HARD

>>127136688
Why is Andy Warhol the worst thing to happen to art?

>>127129631
>modern
>art and culture
Choose one, retarded Pajeet.

Truly one of the worst threads I've seen in ages, lol. I like how AIfags only argument is literally always just
>uhm, what about this other really garbage thing that's now widely accepted??? checkmate!!!1
Yeah, those ideas are garbage too. Your images are 99% retarded. Go fuck yourself.

>>127120254
too soon