>>127135969
>'slop' aka low quality content was everywhere even before AI came around.
It's not black and white. The ease with which you're able to shit out absolute garbage (for example this thread) means that everyone who used to be too untalented to make art (for example yourself) can now flood the Internet with their garbage at an unprecedented pace.
Sites like YouTube and Google images are unusable now because anything you search will return a mountain of low-quality trash that people churn out for money and not for quality.
>AI will flood the landscape and cause a sea change and it will have positive and negative impacts
The opposite is already happening now.
You have no reason to be this optimistic when we can already observe the opposite. You're using the same non-logic as the people who said "immigrants will flood the country and cause a sea change and it will have positive and negative impacts" to promote mass immigration when it was obvious from the start that the negatives would massively outweigh the positives.
>like anything
Like indians in canada?
>AI is already used in hollywood to enhance the workflow in numerous ways- when they made movie posters for a24 civil war, was the media 'negatively effected' by that? what about in the brutalist when they used AI to fix his accent, was the movie negatively effected? when you paint something distracting out of the background of a photo with genfill, is the media negatively effected?
I'm not against AI in technical roles. I'm against it being used generatively to create media from scratch.
For every case in which that kind of AI is used in a positive way, there are a billion jeets shitting out complete garbage with it.
>eventually ppl will come around to the idea that it often has a Positive impact on media, actually
That "often" is very small compared to the "almost always" of the negative impact.
