← Home ← Back to /mu/

Thread 127360160

8 posts 4 images /mu/
Anonymous No.127360160 >>127360464 >>127360531 >>127360536
This is considered one of their (if not the) greatest albums ever made.
But half of it is virtually never really brought up
there are some filler in it - like on every LZ album, but why aren't
>In The Light
>Down By The Seaside
>Custard Pie
>Wanton Song
>Night Flight
more acknowledged?
Anonymous No.127360464
>>127360160 (OP)
all of those songs are played on the radio
Anonymous No.127360531 >>127360613
>>127360160 (OP)
None of those songs are filler outside of maybe seaside you just have retard ears
Anonymous No.127360536
>>127360160 (OP)
In The Light it's one of their best songs
Anonymous No.127360613 >>127361109
>>127360531
Your reading comprehension skills could use some work. The songs listed are the ones he thinks are GOOD and anything NOT LISTED are potentially filler.
Anonymous No.127360624 >>127360693
Physical Graffiti [Swan Song, 1975]
I suppose a group whose specialty is excess should be proud to emerge from a double-LP in one piece. But except on side two--comprising three-only-three Zep classics: "Houses of the Holy," "Trampled Under Foot," and the exotic "Kashmir"--they do disperse quite a bit, not into filler and throwaway ("Boogie with Stu" and "Black Country Woman" on side four are fab prefabs) but into wide tracks, misconceived opi, and so forth. Jimmy Page cuts it throughout, but after a while Robert Plant begins to grate--and I like him. B+
Anonymous No.127360693
>>127360624
This is almost a review
Anonymous No.127361109
>>127360613
thanks for telling it like it is