Thread 127404206

Let it bleed absolutely mogs abbey road

Goddamn right it does.

>>127404219
She said my breasts
They will always be open

>the same basic blues rock song over and over
The Beatles could never

>>127404290
Aftermath
Between the Buttons
Flowers
TSMR

>>127404206 (OP)
Mediocre band

>>127404206 (OP)
Love the stones, listened to all their albums, but the Beatles are always a mile away.
If you compare every years album with the stones it woudnt be fair (for the stones), but try to compare every stones album with what the beatles did 2 years ago, you will find that the beatles are somehow still better. thats how far they were musicaly.
The stones were jamming, the beatles were making music.

>>127404206 (OP)
singles band with no identity other than being "the bad boy version of the Beatles"
their most pathetic venture was putting out their version of Sgt Peppers
a dry soulless mediocre album completely devoid of any concept other than "we can do it too!"
She's a Rainbow is a great song, though

>>127404206 (OP)
stones have better songs, but beatles have better albums

>>127406364
>their most pathetic venture was putting out their version of Sgt Peppers
Everyone was doing psychedelic shit in '67. It's not something the Beatles invented.

>>127407094
it's not just a psychedelic album, it's a straight copy of what the Beatles did with Sgt Peppers, and completely off of the usual Stones sound
so much that they did a completely 180º turn after that, and went back to blues rock forever

>>127404206 (OP)
Stones have aged terribly. It’s just 60s wigger music.
>>127406386
A list of the top 10 songs by either band would have one Stones song at most.

>>127404206 (OP)
what really bothers me about the Stones is this fucking retard being held in such high regard
he's always been a mediocre guitarists, yet he's always put among the best of the genre
his solos are always awkward and poorly played, even in the best songs of the band. Just listen to his playing in Sympathy for the Devil or Monkey Man
he writes nice riffs, that much he does, but his playing is mostly shit
and I don't get why he thinks of himself as some sort of arbiter of musical quality in any aspect
he's a complete retard

ITT: Contrarianism and it's irreparable damage on the human brain

>>127407860
>it's

>>127407869
>ITT: Off topic grammarnigs

>>127407860
Explain why Let It Bleed is a great album

Best band ever.

Deal with it.

Imagine if Undercover had been released with the best songs from the sessions instead of the ones that made the album. It'd be remembered as the last great Stones album instead of that reputation going to Tattoo You.

>>127407894
explain why Abbey Road is a great album

>>127407181
I know, everyone should be Al di Meola or Billy Strings or whomever you worship. Virtuosity is the only measure of quality and meaning.

>>127409230
qrd?

>>127410954
Undercover sessions = Icy cool, moody and atmospheric, ultra-chill downtempo jams with thick hooks mixed with pop-oriented rockin' numbers; overall several potential minor hit singles. A mix of classic sounding Stones and an updated-for-the-80s sound.

Undercover: The actual released version = Literally all the worst and least "classic Stones" sounding songs from the sessions. Without exaggeration probably the worst tracklist they could have selected from the sessions.

A pure outtakes disc, if it sticks to the most finished versions of songs, would even at its worst be better than the album they released at its best. And I say that as someone who likes Undercover. But it's also one of the great unknown tragedies of 80s rock. A would-be-classic that wasn't, whether because of questionable judgement, label interference, or a know-it-all producer, I couldn't say for sure, but somebody fucked up big time and we got cheated out of the last CLASSIC Stones album. (Though I do think there've been GOOD ones since then. But nothing on par with their releases through and including Tattoo You.)

>>127411105
ty. how do you know this tho? and have you heard those songs you speak of?

>>127404206 (OP)
Gimme Shelter alone is better than anything the Beatles ever did

>>127411130
It certainly captured the zeitgeist better. Altho Helter Skelter is similar and invented heavy metal.

>>127411114
There are hundreds of bootlegged Stones outtakes that've been floating around record stores for decades going back to the pre-CD vinyl days, most (possibly all?) of which have made their way online (at least in some form or another). There's enough to populate a whole series of full-length releases with, most of them from the band's heyday and consequently quite good (for the most part). And a lot of it really SHOULD have been released. The closest we've gotten from official sources are the bonus discs from the "Deluxe Edition" releases of some of the albums (Some Girls and Tattoo You most notably) and of course Metamorphosis (I believe their only standalone outtakes album).

And yeah, I've heard them.

>>127407141
>It’s just 60s wigger music.

You're an idiot and you don't understand the context.

>>127410813
I'm not the one who made this thread. You did so support your argument.

Stones are the best rock band
Beatles are the best pop band
What's to fight about?

>>127407181
Yeah dude he doesn't even shred wtf

>>127411130
That song is nothing special.

>>127414439
If you could refute me you would have done it. Early British rock was just white Britons imitating American negros. We call that being wiggers. Except the Stones never (successfully) moved on from that to create their own music.

>>127411249
interesting. ty. i guess i'll have to do an online search

Some low key bangers on this one

>>127404206 (OP)
Trust fund band, all the members met at a private art college.

The Stones (and a lot of other bands from the 60s for that matter) had become a self parody by the late 70’s, which is one thing the Beatles never had.

>>127409217
BASED