← Home ← Back to /mu/

Thread 127405163

22 posts 16 images /mu/
Anonymous No.127405163 >>127405850 >>127405930 >>127405993 >>127407581 >>127407773 >>127407879
Ahhhhhh relaxation. Ahhhh bangersโ€ฆ. Ahhhhhh bangers !!!! Yuh bangers!!!!!!!!! God this album fucking slaps. That being said the lyrics get into the nitty gritty, some very serious subject matters applied to some of the breezyist pop tunes conceived.
Anonymous No.127405215 >>127405986
It's the worst """singing""" I've ever heard. Even Nico sucks. But somehow despite that most songs are catchy.
Anonymous No.127405850 >>127405978
>>127405163 (OP)
Anonymous No.127405930 >>127405970
>>127405163 (OP)
Itโ€™s alrightโ€ฆbut I canโ€™t stand the gay voice lou reed puts on.
Anonymous No.127405970
>>127405930
Anonymous No.127405978
>>127405850
Anonymous No.127405986
>>127405215
Anonymous No.127405993
>>127405163 (OP)
Anonymous No.127405996 >>127406004
Car wash classic
Anonymous No.127406004
>>127405996
Anonymous No.127407581
>>127405163 (OP)
shiny, shiny. shiny boots of leather
Anonymous No.127407731 >>127407891
The greatest cultural achievement of humanity. The fact they sent gay ass piano music and the Beatles on Voyager instead of this is testament to our doomed species.
Anonymous No.127407773
>>127405163 (OP)
Might I suggest the MFSL CD master, so you can hear precisely how shittily it was recorded.
Anonymous No.127407879
>>127405163 (OP)
I've grown way out of this band.
Anonymous No.127407891 >>127407918
>>127407731
Close to the Edge is one million times better than anything with Lou Reed's name out it. He was against the expansion and elevation of music and idiots applaud him for that.
Anonymous No.127407918 >>127407957
>>127407891
>yes did more different sound so that mean they expanded music more
Neanderthal. I guess Mr Bungle or 100 Gecs are the greatest artists of all time
Anonymous No.127407957 >>127408362
>>127407918
I've never heard Mr. Bungle but I do enjoy about four or five tracks on the latest 100 Gecs album (or is it 100 gecs? All these artists are too insecure to capitalize their names.) But anyway, you obviously know I don't think they're the greatest band of all time. The Velvet Underground is objectively better than 100 gecs, you're changing the subject because you know that Yes in 1971 and 1972 kicked the living shit out of the Velvet Underground.
Anonymous No.127408362 >>127408373
>>127407957
I like all four of the artists we've just mentioned but I do think TVU&N was more groundbreaking in 1967 than Closer to the Edge was in 1972. And I don't care for keyboard solos.
Anonymous No.127408373 >>127408498 >>127408545
>>127408362
And I don't see how incorporating drone and free jazz and noise into rock n roll was him being against expanding music. As far as long songs go, Close to the Edge is awesome but I'd rather listen to Sister Ray or Street Hassle.
Anonymous No.127408498
>>127408373
I don't see how playing mundane rock and roll for eighteen minutes straight is experimental or progressive. Describing the Velvet Underground as free jazz is also absurd, Lou Reed was against jazz. Of all the songs on White Light/White Heat that could have been stretched out to eighteen minutes, Sister Ray is the least deserving. I like most of the songs on White Light/White Heat, but Sister Ray is no better than I'm Waiting For My Man. In fact, I'm Waiting For My Man is probably a better song. The album is also in desperate need of a remaster, although it will probably never get one because people are so worshipful of this band that they see every single flaw as a testament to its quality. The reality is, White Light/White Heat is a weak sounding album. The songs themselves call for a more powerful sound. The whole album sounds like somebody rattling a sheet of tin foil. Close to the Edge is experimental not because of its length, it's because of the amount of ground it covers in those eighteen minutes and the way the whole thing ties together. It gives you everything that it promises and more. Anyway, what we have is a fundamental difference in taste. I'm not going to convince you to like Close to the Edge more than Sister Ray with a post.
Anonymous No.127408545 >>127408681
>>127408373
I don't see how playing mundane rock and roll for eighteen minutes straight is experimental or progressive. Describing the Velvet Underground as free jazz is also absurd, Lou Reed was against jazz. Of all the songs on White Light/White Heat that could have been stretched out to eighteen minutes, Sister Ray is the least deserving. I like most of the songs on White Light/White Heat, but Sister Ray is no better than I'm Waiting For My Man. In fact, I'm Waiting For My Man is probably a better song. The album is also in desperate need of a remaster, although it will probably never get one because people are so worshipful of this band that they see every single flaw as a testament to its quality. The reality is, White Light/White Heat is a weak sounding album. The songs themselves call for a more powerful sound. The whole album sounds like somebody rattling a sheet of tin foil. Close to the Edge is experimental not because of its length, it's because of the amount of ground it covers in those eighteen minutes and the way the whole thing ties together. It delivers everything that it promises and more. Anyway, what we have is a fundamental difference in taste. I'm not going to convince you to like Close to the Edge more than Sister Ray with a post.
Anonymous No.127408681
>>127408545
I agree with most of what you said but for the time, Sister Ray was in fact experimental