Jewish Exec Calls Jewish Artist A Clown Faggot
Capture.png
md5: a1305764... 🔍
Drake sued UMG for defamation and harassment in January and has since filed several amended complaints. In March, UMG moved to have the case dismissed, noting that Drake “lost a rap battle that he provoked and in which he willingly participated."
This week, Drake's lawyers attempted to further their case by obtaining UMG's contract with Lamar and information related to allegations of domestic violence and other crimes committed by Lamar.
Grainge rejected the notion that he "was behind a scheme to ‘devalue’ [Drake’s] brand through the release and promotion of the Kendrick Lamar recording ‘Not Like Us’—an allegation that makes no sense due to the fact that the company that I run has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in Drake, including longstanding and critical financial support for his recording career, the purchase and ownership of the bulk of his recording catalog and the purchase of his music-publishing rights.
Grainge insists he "never heard the recording ‘Not Like Us,’ nor ever saw the corresponding cover art or music video, until after they were released by Interscope Records" and says further, "Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of ‘Not Like Us,’ its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
In a separate filing, UMG calls Drake's latest motion a matter of "spite" and states, "The premise of Drake’s motion—that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure—is absurd."
This week, Drake's lawyers attempted to further their case by obtaining UMG's contract with Lamar and information related to allegations of domestic violence and other crimes committed by Lamar.
Grainge rejected the notion that he "was behind a scheme to ‘devalue’ [Drake’s] brand through the release and promotion of the Kendrick Lamar recording ‘Not Like Us’—an allegation that makes no sense due to the fact that the company that I run has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in Drake, including longstanding and critical financial support for his recording career, the purchase and ownership of the bulk of his recording catalog and the purchase of his music-publishing rights.
Grainge insists he "never heard the recording ‘Not Like Us,’ nor ever saw the corresponding cover art or music video, until after they were released by Interscope Records" and says further, "Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of ‘Not Like Us,’ its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
In a separate filing, UMG calls Drake's latest motion a matter of "spite" and states, "The premise of Drake’s motion—that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure—is absurd."
