Thread 127420647

Bob Dylan BUSTED approving of AI use?!

first Nick Cave, now this? how do we cope, Antibros?

>>127420647 (OP)
Go back to your containment board.

>>127420656
you can't contain the inevitable future, no matter how much you seethe ;)

>>127420669
Go back.

Clankers fuck OFF

dylan is senile

>>127420647 (OP)
Our little fraudster

Talentless kike

This is why bob dylan is a great artist, and anti-AI faggots are masturbating losers. Dylan is in his damn 80's and he's still experimenting with new techniques. He does not give a shit what people think: he sees something that allows him to express himself in a new way and he just goes for it. "Let's give it a shot and see what happens." That's the attitude of a real artist.

>>127421207
>>127421157

>>127420647 (OP)
These videos are designed to hook boomers like him

>>127421207
On one hand I'm glad delivery clankers haven't taken over my city yet, but on the other hand I really want to kick one some time.

>>127421350
More like after six decades of fame and accolades but now he's on his deathbed and doesn't give a shit how badly AI will affect artists moving forward in time

>>127421600
which is more likely:
1) Acclaimed musician Bob Dylan, who has changed the course of music history multiple times, who has one of the longest sustained musical careers of all time, the only songwriter to have won a nobel prize, is a hack; or
2) You, some random nobody, is talking out your ass

>>127420647 (OP)
It's not like Bob Dylan wrote most of his own music anyways

>>127421631
I didn't say he was a hack I just said he doesn't care. Wgich is true

>>127421530
bruh. he created those videos with AI then posted them. he wasn't tricked, he's doing the tricking. keep up

>>127421749
he doesn't care... about the fearmongering. there you're right. he doesn't care about the 'ai is for jeets' psyop. he cares about the act of creation and is playing with a new tool for shits and giggles. get on his level

>>127421479
Go back.

>>127422165
nope. but thanks for the bump ;)

>>127420647 (OP)
what's the problem with using AI?

>>127420647 (OP)
what the heck are those videos kek
>in his own words
>speaks from beyond the grave
i don't think he even used it to voice their actual words, it's just pure gpt slop text with a robonarrator

>>127423534
well dylan seems to have added to negative value slop saturating the internet by attributing to those figures words that they never wrote and that boomers are now taking as legit, who knows if he even realizes that his chatgpt fanfics aren't actual quotations
it points to a dire future for human creativity and learning the more this becomes the norm and crowds everything else out

>>127420647 (OP)
He rips off a lot of his lyrics from poetry and his music from old songs so AI is fine for the grifter

>>127423746
the internet is 99% slop and has been for a long time, if you think AI is ruining something that is worth saving you're retarded

I WAS DREAMING I WAS SLEEEEEPING IN ROSIEEE'S BED <3

>>127420647 (OP)
why does this redditor think these are "imagined biographical musings"? can someone who knows more about history tell me if these stories are fake and gay? i checked out the andrew jackson one and most of the al capone one and it seemed legit to me

>>127421944
>>127421956
Zoomers.
Cannot.
Troll.

>>127423795
he's just used ai to write wiki summaries from a generic first person larp perspective so while probably not too wrong on basic biographical facts it's not their "own words", speeches or character as claimed

>>127420647 (OP)
Fuck off soulless jeet roach

>>127423783
be that as it may people spend hella time on the internet so it reflects back on irl, like most /mu/sic discovery and listening happens online

>>127423852
boomers.
getting.
wooshed.

tale as old as time

>>127421479
What do AI sloppers expect to gain from using David Lynch as a mascot? A great beloved artist allegedly liked AI so everyone just has to respect that? You don't have to agree with him.

>>127425879
'allegedly' kek easy with the cope. he verifiably loved AI and saw it as an obvious tool for creatives

'what we gain' is exactly seen in your comment - forcing pseuds to reckon with the idea that their hero has the exact opposite take as them. prompting the question - do you really think you knew better than Lynch about creative potentials of technology? you'd have to be pretTtttty smugly confident in you own skills and position in the world to think that. link your filmography i'd love to see

>>127420647 (OP)
Auto tune, heavy sampling and digital limiting did infinitely more damage to music than ai ever possibly could.
>>127420669
>>127425864
lol

Tangled Up In Poo

>>127420647 (OP)
holy crap all the dylan themed boomer slop has come full circle

>>127420647 (OP)
Bob Dylan is a literal pedophile

>>127423874
this goes right over the head of a propagandized AIphobe, but that's the joke. Dylan using the new tech to puppeteer these historical figures and presenting it at face value with no real wink to the audience. literally the death of the author. high level trolling no cap

What do they care, they're already ded

>>127426626
All rock stars are

>>127426009
>do you really think you knew better than Lynch about creative potentials of technology?
nta but entirely possible because boomers are tech braindead, and creatively spent old dudes with a name to milk (where ai sure would be useful) don't represent anyone else on the audience or artist side
and a lot of major artists have good reasons to oppose gen ai so if we're gonna discuss it as plebs what can you do but pick your own position

>>127426967
the people in hollywood like David Lynch are getting a supercharged version of what you and I the average consumer get. so all these meme complaints, yellow tone, six fingers, you can't control it etc, are only because we are using the pleb version. once you take those flaws out of the equation the math becomes different and it becomes obvious how useful of a tool it is, in its many variations. for filmmaking in particular. audio cleanup, upscaling, noise reduction, background replacement, painting things out easier, this all becomes way faster with AI. a faster process allows more 'room to dream' to quote the king

>>127420647 (OP)
first *the beatles
did you already the abomination that Now and Then was?!

>>127427163
AI is the new punk, libtard. sorry kamala lost

>>127427185
I get Natasha Leyonne, but why Tails & Sid Vicious?

>>127427134
>so all these meme complaints, yellow tone, six fingers, you can't control it etc
at least with music i think the worry is what's lost if the total saturation of ai gens floods out the human creative process and delight in its fruits, and whether music can move people the same way again if it may as well just have been prompted, and that art as part of the human experience just turns into content lukewarmly received from the computer
maybe a bad comparison but social media and dating apps were supposed to connect but on average more alienated people; ai promises endless art but might have a similar monkey's paw effect on creation, also in the elimination of interaction and "friction" between people which we don't seem happier for so far but idk
>a faster process allows more 'room to dream' to quote the king
i think touch-up use like that has fewer detractors but with ai it seems a blurry line to where you're prompting the core human part of the vision too, or the world is so flooded with trivially generated shit that no one cares about any of them either way
also arguably the ease of cgi and digital music production didn't leave us with much expanded creativity or enjoyment either, if anything a decline in impact