Where the fuck is carnival of light? We know it sucks shit, there's no need to be coy. At this rate we'll get it when they're all dead in some underwhelming boring release that makes the morning news
>>127469608
Honestly sounds way better than the garbled 95 version. I'm looking forward to Real Love. After hearing Now and Then a few years ago, I'm not against using AI as a tool to polish existing songs, as long as they don't get stupid with it and release real AI created slop under the Beatles name.
>>127468440 (OP)
Remember when Get Back was a huge success and everyone loved it and Peter Jackson had 10 more Beatles archive projects lined up that the fans actually wanted? >Yeah sorry boss that's too expensive, the shareholders want us to shit out more low effort AI remasters and exclusive Disney+™ content
>>127471673
Revolution 9 is structured and conceptual while Carnival of Light was supposedly just random noise. Most of the people who have heard it weren't impressed.
>>127471599
AI mastering tools aren't as ethically dubious as LLMs for sure, but a lot of times the results are a lot cruder than old school programs, ironically enough. Every one of those AI upscaled music videos looks like complete dogshit.