>>127630045 (OP)
No, they are the only passable one. Though there is a kind of cottage industry for Bubble Man covers >>127630052
Ok, but itβs not the same thing when youβre covering himself
are they even still around, last I recall was them saying "act 3 soon guys" and then spending a decade doing nothing but covers of 80's tracks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C8QmvcK0RA
>>127633192
Not sure. It seemed unique, that's why it was the first thing I thought when I see this album. The movie itself has a cyberpunky+50s sort of aesthetic. I guess the poster somewhat evokes it.