Thread 127639388

has your fave musician ever used AI, mu?

were you able to forgive them for that horrifying transgression?

>>127639388 (OP)
posting in a /pol/ thread

>“It is such a great tool,” Ulvaeus said during the panel, per the Hollywood Reporter. “It’s unimaginable that you can bounce back and forth with a machine, or a software, which can give you ideas to go in various different directions.”
>“A misconception is that AI can write a whole song. It’s lousy at that — very bad. And thank God! It’s very bad at lyrics as well. But it can give you ideas,” Ulvaeus continued.
>So you can prompt the lyric and the style you want, asking, ‘Where would you go from here?’ And it usually comes up with garbage, but sometimes there is something in it that gives you another idea,” he added. ”That’s how it works.”
>he joked that unlike his ABBA co-writer Benny Andersson, AI “is quicker and does exactly what you tell it.”

Im my favorite musician and i use AI for gooning purposes 98% of the time, its an amazing tool

>>127639455
>>>/r/ope

>>127639388 (OP)
chud talking point, AI is chud-coded and chuds are going to die lonely and alone

>>127639683
>>>/r/ope

>>127639388 (OP)
AI is like autotune, plastic surgery or trannies. If they do it well, nobody notices they did it at all, which is fine.

It only sucks when it's obvious, which is what everyone bitches about.

>>127640521
fair analysis except many people bitch about it regardless of if its good or bad

>>127639388 (OP)
Can you make a real life ai-image of Chappell Roan in a doggy-style position? Ass facing the viewer? With her looking back at the viewer? With tears? With "b-b-but I'm gay?" As a caption at the bottom of the image?

>>127639683
Kek cope, chuds are winning.

I don't really care about it. It's the most overhyped and overfeared invention in history and the only reason people care about it is because it's named after a soience fiction term that hardly describes what it is. Large language models are not intelligent.
>>127641113
>antis
why do you talk like a tranny?

>>127639388 (OP)
>has your fave musician ever used AI, mu?
not in their art
>were you able to forgive them for that horrifying transgression?
it'd certainly lower my opinion of them

>>127641113
AI cum gobblers and their manufactured victim complex are complete lunatics, they really are living in a world of their own

>>127639388 (OP)
AI used by artists still has the artistic intention of the artist, so it becomes curation rather than creation, the same way an artist can hire people to help them bring their vision to life.
Nothing wrong with that if what the artist is happy with what the AI made (which will be as good as the artist's taste is).
The issue is when random people with terrible taste and zero artistic ability or thought engage in the same "curation" and are happy with the absolute garbage they make AI generate, so they flood the planet with slop that they're too dunning-kruger to distinguish from high quality art.

The problem isn't that it's non-human or whatever. It's that it dramatically increases the democratization of the arts, which results in the aforementioned flood that comes with far more downsides than upsides for the art world as a whole.

>>127639388 (OP)
All my fave musicians are dead.

>>127639388 (OP)
>people who shape art and culture
>it's just popular, mass culture garbage
lol

>>127641113
Why are these images always piss-stained?

>>127643559
Because it's not actually AI, they're photos taken in cheap places like India (the lens is covered in some yellowish brownish substance) or in Mexico (that's just the color of Mexico).

>>127643470
Based and same

>>127639388 (OP)
idk why this is killing me

>>127639388 (OP)
Yeah. Dream Theater used in their latest album artwork, tour poster and concert video wall.
Mike Portnoy defended that on social media by saying that they paid Hugh Syme (the "artist") to make them artwork, how he made it is irrelevant. Rudess also loves AI, he always posts AI crap on Instagram and he works with some big university in order to make a music generation model based on him. I just know that he'll cause the band's biggest controversy with his AI obsession. people will discover that he didn't write his parts on the next album or something like that.

>>127639388 (OP)
>the miracle of AI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOP76SVYX7k

>>127643335
im right and you know it faggot

>>127644972
KEK

>>127644972
good example of how even in shitposting AI can make something legit catchy. the left lane is where I'll go and other parts could actually be used in a hit. other parts would have to be scrapped obv, as >>127639589 said

>>127639388 (OP)
My favourite artist Sangshweeng Haripariwathaneseashung used it to create a clickbait thumbnail for his clickbait video advertising his badly AI generated music video of his Ai generated song

Btw David Lynch made 2deep 4 u art house bullshit movies that no one actually watched he didn't influence culture much

>>127640521
Except auto tune was always very obvious. It was more about who was using it. T-Pain used it well and it became a part of his brand. Cher using it was just a tragedy.

>>127645710
>>127645762
when i first heard it it was stuck in my head for days lol humming it while puttering outside or whatever. good thing i dont have a car..

No one used auto tune well-it was always an embarrassing crutch

>>127646070
TP alone was hugely influential, try again.

>>127641113
You are delusional

>>127646260
>TP alone was hugely influential,
Not in India it wasn't.

>>127646291
no you are normie

crazy how quick this went from fuzzy images of shrek meeting robocop, to an actual thing

how did you retards manage to turn even this into a my side your side thing?

It's funny how chuds love AI so much because for the first time in history, they can actually create things without using templates

Their minds are so primitive that they can't create original things, hilarious

>>127649449
meanwhile, the 4 thought leaders of the Anti AI movement:

>>127649420
there's pretty clear sides bro. just as there were clear sides when the printing press or the camera came out. its 2025 Luddities

>>127649543
haha I just type the words into the computer and it makes the picture for me, I am so empowered haha

>>127649555
oof youre really that behind huh. next few years are gonna cause you some trouble, kek. can't wait

>>127649555
Unironically yes. Keep up jeet

>>127649633
>>127649667
You can use AI to make a video of a fictional reality where you actually get to hold a girl's hand

>>127649211
I meant toilet paper ,my lad

You know what I like? Genuine artistic expression by humans

>>127649744
thats what grandpas say every time

>>127639388 (OP)
The pro-AI sentiment is the biggest sign that /pol/tards are normies, but they actually think of themselves as the only non-normies, really funny stuff

>>127649978
They just follow the herd because they're literally normies

>>127650033
>>127649978
>>127649964
cannot wait for AI to wipe the sneers off your faggot faces

>>127639388 (OP)
its not a transgression. you are the problem

>>127649945
>1976
Done by humans
>Nevermind
Done by humans
>2020
???

>>127650050
As someone with an IQ below 100, you should be worried, because most jobs you can do will be automated or be easy to perform by software with embedded LLMs

Chuds were born to be the slaves and servants of creative people. Their only goal is to enact the whims of their superiors. They have looked on their whole lives at creative people with a mix of envy and hatred, and they think being able to turn photos of their dog into Ghibli with a machine makes them equal to actually skilled and creative people.

You will never be one of us.

Honestly, the outrage against AI art is one of the most embarrassing meltdowns in recent memory. You’ve got people who spent years grinding fundamentals—Loomis heads, Bridgman anatomy studies, painful gesture drawings—only to watch some random person type “cyberpunk samurai girl eating ramen at 3AM in the rain” and get a flawless, high-res masterpiece in seconds. And they hate that. Not because it’s “soulless” or “stealing,” but because it shattered the illusion that technical skill was the sole barrier to artistic expression.

Let’s be real: a lot of you weren’t protecting art. You were protecting your monopoly on it. The same people crying about AI “tracing” are out here photobashing, using filters, and mimicking other artists’ styles without blinking. You bash AI for not understanding anatomy—yet half your drawings look like melted action figures. AI just pulled the curtain back and exposed the fact that most of what gets praised in the art world is surface-level polish and trend-chasing, not deep, meaningful soul or creativity.

What AI really stole is your excuses. Now that anyone can make stunning visuals without spending thousands of hours on technique, it all comes down to imagination, taste, and ideas. And unfortunately, most of you don’t have those. So instead of adapting or leveling up, you’re lashing out like gatekeepers at a party that’s no longer exclusive.

Art isn’t dead. It’s just been democratized—and you can’t stand that.

>>127641113
>>127649194
>>127649211
>>127651678
Sam Altman will be the first tech CEO to livestream his suicide.

>>127650123
that's... the... bit...

you can't really be that low IQ?

Antis are literal teenagers bro

>>127643282
>India will be superpower country in 2026!

How far has AI-generated music come from the days of "Blue Jeans and Bloody Tears"?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MKAf6YX_7M

>>127639388 (OP)
AI's presence already feels less relentless than it did at the beginning of this year.
People are already starting to not care. And it's bipartisan too, despite what the losers want to think.
Tucker Carlson had his little video bitching about AI slop on social media and CURRENT YEAR guy did a full segmant on it. Both were well received by their followers.
And at best, AI won the battle against artists but lost the war against its critics.
AGI was kind of a requirement to keep investment in this stupidness and it's obvious at this point, filling a datacenter with porn and GitHub projects just ain't the way to achieve it. Microsoft is scrambling like an epileptic to keep OpenAI afloat.

>>127639388 (OP)
the creative class is either cucked and useless or borderline retarded and pompously untalented atp. AI is what they deserve and what their audiences want deep down.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OKW50Sg2XbfJ

You are so scam'd

are AI-tards at the same mental level of NFT-fags?
are they the same people? i cant imagine a different demographic to be this retarded

>>127655038
Not exactly the same people but there's definitely a big overlap.

>>127655038
Yeah, pretty much. A good sign that AI is retarded is the fact that it attracts these same people, along with other normies and pajeets. Well, that and the fact that it looks like garbage 99% of the time.